It's not a false pretense. You brought up a conspiracy theory rooted in a belief of a dominant New World Order orchestrating cultural and racial genocide. I brought up a statistic. To respond in such a way to a statistic, to deny the facts that lead to unrest, and to assume that it is reflective in a conspiratorial belief, is foolish. People have grievances rooted in fact. Not every person who knows that fact believes it comes from a grand conspiracy. Rejecting the fact of the decline of the White population and projecting this conspiracy onto the simple, factual statement is the most reactionary and unhelpful way to respond to truth.

The measure of a "good leader" is in their ability to quell dissent.

To say there is no Left Wing in America is to deny an entire radical counterculture.
Read Sorel.

You are projecting. Regardless of what narrative you put to it, it's true.

It is simply a statement of uncontroversial fact.

Why then is it okay to discriminate against - often minority - Whites?

How so?

I think that it's worth saying so as not to erase the truth behind the hyperbole. There's a reason many white young men feel disenfranchised as they do. There is racism toward whites. And white populations are shrinking from the majority.

It's a fact. The white genocide conspiracy BS doesn't take away from that.

A very, very good question.

Whites are becoming minorities in many places.

Usually there's a reason someone says one pronoun or another. Usually that's based on certain aesthetics.

It's usually fairly automatic for a person to decide what pronoun to use.
Is it an imposition to correct someone who would rather not comply?

What about with an identity like Orthodoxy, asking women to cover themselves, sometimes head to toe?

Some people think one is a more fair ask than the other. Usually for moral reasons.
If they're operating under entirely different moral frameworks, are they even perceiving the same reality? Do the aesthetics of gender overlap? Or do they contradict reality?

It's not only a label. It's a perception. You can be racist whether or not you're called racist. If you're racist it probably has nothing to do with gays or women and everything to do with race. It's normal to be drawn to that which is like you. But it's very stigmatized to express that now.

People have been saying 50 years for a bit too long.

Where does personal identity end and imposition on others begin?

If not, what keeps you from revolt?

To rephrase, do you believe that what you're experiencing is freedom?

No.

You're describing distractions. Video games. Weed.
Why would these things become more accessible to the working class if not to quell dissent?

This is not an improvement of life. This is a distraction.

Are you free?

Anything can be justified as a means to an end if you win.