Is Climatology Science?
You're a real pain in the ass! Writing 100076678 words, about the number you wrote in your question, to fight the claim that climatology is not a science, and thus are wrong in saying that it's almost certain that climate change is man-induced, is about as stupid as asking if cosmology is a science. Of course climatology is a science! Your self indulgent mockery doesn't change that. You seem to have little and small knowledge about the atmospherical going-ons yourself considering your last comment where your only contribution is arrogance.
And even if climate change would be natural (which it isn't, as I can tell even without any knowledge of climatology), would that justify dumping carbon-based shit or whatever up there. By means of high pipes to make it less noticed (only by an increased number of forrest fires and floodings in this year and for future generations)? Would not changing oxygen levels justify people-induced disappearance of biodiversity (the number of butterfly species in my country has dropped by 70%)?
So, you wanted attention? Consider yourself succesful regarding that!