A good mind, but not a "positive" one. Do only what means to you. In my case, when nothings makes more sense, I know it is the time to go to sleep. And I wake up always so much better! All makes sense again.

Thinking preceeds action; there is no action without thinking, and sometimes a lot of think is necessary to do something; so, I chose "morality" when morality is according with the laws of nature, which is prior to the etics and the laws of mankind. Who thinks the principles rules the universe. Who is capable of; I think that morality is good, is some way, when we don't have the time for elaborated thinking; is a social automatism.

Logic is Spirit, not mind or body. Only the spirit can predict or "create and discover".

No, I don't think so. Logic and prediction is the very same thing. Logic and good results, the same.

talking nonsense; catholicism is a very diferent thing; search "fides et ratio", for example; there are some true catholicism in that document

Well, what you mean with "idealism"? Fichte? Schelling? What else?

I don't think is a fallacy but a "error of method".

more or less; I think that exist a "subconsciounessly" (strange word, but it is a arquetipal subconscious); I don't think that "subconsciouness" is a reality, but it consist only in alterity.

Human dignity is not "the dignity of mankind" but the dignity to be alive, to be free, and to make good choises, the best choices possibles.

I think is lack of talent.

Animals have some "conception" of truth. I think it is right. I don't think, however, that "animals is truth". I don't think in that way; but I think that animals have a understandable language by humans.

I think that is positive to "not choice anything".

If Lao Tse can be considered a "philosopher", I think he is right in that afirmation.

Can we create an "evolutionary" kantism?

a matter of fact.

Never. Possible and actual. Simultaneous.

Well, I really dont know what you are talking about.

things likes "the sky are happy" dont atract me.

Good Luck!

Consciousness is not really a matter of fact, but experience; nature doesnt produce consciouness, its a form tha transcends nature, and nature will became like the content of consciousness. The "analytical consciouness" does not exist.

[sorry for the bad english]

well, I think that the question is: how to conciliate the 'becoming' with the 'will'?

the 'forever changing' with the necessity to make decisions, to be objective;

and how to grasp the reality from inumerals appearances;

at least seems to be, 'ontologically';

The essence of man is truthfulness.