"Why should we stick to that old definition which came after the old definition?"
- Haglund

Well because if we use different definitions than what is commonly attributed to the major faiths, then it won't address the arguments for what a God is base on the majority adherents in the world... it's like arguing for the ability of Superman by arguing for a "superman" in a circus...

I have the impression guys that you are using a definition of a god that is far too alien from mainstream thought of what God is...
God by definition is Omnipotent, Omnibenevolent, Omniscient, Omnitemporal, Omnipresent and Perfect... if God by definition must necessarily be perfect... then he cannot make free choices... as he/she can only choose perfection