The failure to grasp morality Philosophy has produced many theories on ethics. Some say it's about happiness and other say it's about duty or about virtue.
The point is we haven't got an infallible guide to ethcial living. Perhaps ethics isn't something that can be understood in a purely rational sense.
Why?
A lot of our moral instincts (in the absence of anything solid in philosophy) involve emotion. Yes, emotion is bad for rationality - fallacies breed in feelings - but we also know that a good moral foundation requires empathy. And empathy is emotion.
So, I ask you, do you think we need to invest our hearts and not just our brains in ethics? — TheMadFool
Absolutely we need to invest our hearts. I would like to add that although empathy might be an emotion, "empathy" can also be a very effective tool in understanding another person, not through proof or evidence but much like Aristotle taught us that "It is a mark of an educated mind to entertain the ideas of others, without taking them on for you own."
To me empathy is the highest form of understanding another person and can allow the most natural emotional connection to take place. When you are mirroring another and are empathetic to their position, your field of possibilities of things you had not thought of expands.
Now to the necessity of having the heart in place as well as ethics. We as "thinkers" gravitate towards an ethical balance and in most cases, we can debate what is and isn't ethical but when we put identities in play, hearts and minds attached, it can take on a whole new meaning that you never saw coming. But because you are capable of expressing empathy or listening empathetically and have your ethical compass in place, you can entertain ideas that usually fall out of the norm.
For instance: I am still working through an idea that is already acceptable ethically and implemented in Australia, that is very impressive when it comes to showing empathy to those who might be struggling with something most of us don't encounter but this is one that threw me for a loop. I have been working for two, maybe three years to find my ethical balance on government paying for this but my empathy factor is already convinced.
See what you think of this:
Sex workers
to the
Australian and Danish government paying for:
The right to fornication has its own internal logic and social workers in Denmark as well as Australia have followed it industriously to its conclusion in the care of disabled clients.
Can you see how both ethics and heart, love and empathy are all in play?