20.) But these are the characteristics of what we call God - therefore God exists. — darthbarracuda

Yes, belleiver like me aggree with conclusion but also no-believer say they charaterisic of reality. It demonsrate absoluttenes of any name and open 2 many conclusson. Me believe in God but have no seen propper argument, only own coclusion and is no fair to others.

I go 2 church, am protestat, reddeem gospel, very few rules compared 2 othres. But problem is philosophy is about knowledge which affect belief. So if am philospher how not to apply reason to belief also? Is why am more athiest even if I go 2 church. My reason is deeper than faith coz more practical value than just hope in life after death. If religon say now is more important then I see more value. If idea of tomorrow is more important then when is today value?

Philosophy is much concern 4 truth than fact but science is more concern 4 fact than truth. Philosophy search 4 truth and after find it see fact inside and move on to next problem. Science not ok with truth without fact. Science want to know more about fact. In end, both give truth and fact which go together.

What if argument is foward? I eat because of energy. Why? To do work. Why? To get target. Why? To move foward. Why? When get ther, have an answer.
We dont have answr for everything frm one point. So when we move to new point we have new question and new answr.