I see, that's an interesting way of putting it. That you only need to mental capacity to view 4D space in that instance. Do you therefore think that consciousness is in a way transcendable?
well there wasn't really much thinking behind jt as it was just a quick though. I guess I was just wondering that basically instead of causality being objective (A=B) it could be thought of as also subjective in a way or relative in this case.
It was just a thought that occurred to me when I was thinking about time travel. It got me thinking that if things in motion have different perceived timeframes then why not maybe things that (even while stationary) perceive a different cause and effect, a bit like quantum mechanics where observation is different depending on other factors (I'm not a QM expert).
It was just a thought that occurred to me when I was thinking about time travel. It got me thinking that is things in motion are relative then why not maybe things that have different masses for example.