Considering that each and every living beings has its own perception of time, could it be possible to assume that there could be the possibility of the existence of the multiverse? Does time really applies unequivocally to all living beings as a whole regardless of perception?

Yes all of this brings me to my ultime point. Assuming the premise that we have different notion of the perception of time, could it be possible that destiny truely exists. Let me explain further. Some events as stated previously appears to us slow or really fast. The same rule applies to all other life forms assuming they can comprehend their physical world and the notion of time (let's assume). This brings me to this. Events that are currently unfolding before our eyes (as human beings that we call the present) could have already occured in a different scale (lets say the macroscopic points of view). Could it be possible that destiny (the future already being written in advance) could be a plausible outcome assuming that premise being true?

So if we assume your premise that the present is a change between the past and the future is true then how can you explain the space-time continuum? It is represented as a continuity not a discontinuity in time.

Yes by energy I mean the life force if you want of the human being. The soul being a certain form of energy it can't be destroyed or created but only transferred. Reincarnation could be possible (the transfer of energy from one body to another hence life after death).

Life is not meaningless and here is why. First of all, everything has its own role to play in the natural order of the universe. If you observe closely you will begin to realise that everything is a cycle and it repeats itself from the beginning of time. Life is like a chess board. Every piece has its own value and its own place. Second of all, you will see that even if we look at the bigger picture (for instance the life span of the galaxy or the universe) our existence seems insignificant but yet we are conscious of our environement and we are able to interact and change things around us. That is a certain form of power. To conclude, everything that you see is relative. From the macroscopic world that seems to us like really old and moving slowly to the quantic world where everything seems to move faster its only a question of scale. Maybe we are 7 billion years old as humans for the quantic world (who knows).

Sincerely,
Paul

Your point of view is very interesting but I would like to explore a little bit more with you. Since time appears like a flow to us, could it be possible that the past, the present and the future be as one? Pretending and assuming that the premise of the insect being able to comprehend its world enough to separate the past, the present and the future but having a different perception of time because of its size (time going slower in his perception than in ours). Let me explain further. The ephemeroptera has a life span of 1 day in our perception of time. But for him he has lived his entire life during such a short duration of time (in our perception). Could it be possible that time applies differently?

I am speaking here of reincarnation. Life after death. There is no incoherent arguments and if so please do explain.

Yes my question regroup both the perception of time that is non-simultaneous and at a different rate than the human. Since there would be a major gap between scales (one being way bigger than the other one) could it be possible that time does apply differently? Let me explain further. In the quantic world (where only possibility of existence matters) it is infinitely small compared to us. Same applies to the macroscopic one where galaxies (if we were big enough) time would seem to go way faster if we were able to see humain beings. All of this to ask if the perception of time relies on the scale of the form itself (hence the relativity of time).