I don't think that moral tolerance of other cultures should be shown, but that's just my opinion.

I'd have to get pdfs of them.

I tend to be a Cultural Relativist, one who bases Ethics of a given society pertaining to the culture.

I don't really think it should be up to a personal choice on who or what they find reasonable, esp. if it pooled among a group democratically and those who find it unreasonable are screwed. I'm no utilitarian, but those who create the contract should be of higher value than those subject to it.

The issue with the current hegemony lies in with liberal institutions , whether right leaning or left leaning (it doesn't matter) of social media who dictate what can and/or cannot be said. Since I oppose liberalism in all its forms, restoring free speech would require most of these institutions to sell their assets to a public domain, such a state appartus, to avoid any sort of bias in either side with a mixed delegation of people from many walks of life and across the board in terms of ideology to ensure no "tyranny of a majority" exists. However how this arrangement comes about depends how much faith one has in the general macrocosm of humanity.