The Philosophy Forum

  • Forum
  • Members
  • HELP

  • Is Sartre's deferring to immaterialism legitimate grounds on which to criticise his philosophy?
    Thanks Unenlightened. I'll reflect on all that.
  • Is Sartre's deferring to immaterialism legitimate grounds on which to criticise his philosophy?
    Thanks Unenlightened. The lunch and architect examples are very useful. But I'm still somewhat confused:

    To consider acting is not to act. — unenlightened

    Is it not? Considering is a verb; does that not make it (and thus considering to act) an act in itself? It requires the passage of time. Time in which material changes take place. This probably highlights my misunderstanding of Sartre's philosophy. I'll try to reply with a better example in future, once I've reflected on your examples a little longer.
Home » Hay Digger

Hay Digger

Start FollowingSend a Message
  • About
  • Comments
  • Discussions
  • Uploads
  • Other sites we like
  • Social media
  • Terms of Service
  • Sign In
  • Created with PlushForums
  • © 2025 The Philosophy Forum