Atheism is untenable in the 21st Century
Sure, from the OP, I suggested these so-called phenomenon of making judgements from intuition.
1. Every event must have a cause.
That's called a synthetic a priori judgment. It's a synthesis of two concepts: experience and innate or what psychologists would call, intrinsic intuition.
So we know the statement is partially true but we're not exactly certain because we have not experienced every event.
This is ( an example of) the nature of human wonderment. And is also absolutely necessary (synthetic propositions) in using logic to discover anything in physics.
That also goes back to my point about half-truths existing (if you painstakingly read further back in the thread).
And so once again we're seeing that life is not perfectly logical like the Atheist's politically posit.
Faith, hope and love... .