First of all, just saying this as a positive constructive feedback,I think that if your argument had a structure from to present what you are stating, it would be easier for your readers to understand and follow your premises and its connection to your second one. Furthermore, why do you conclude hate is triggered by something or is necessary for your belief of yin and yang theme.
I feel that hate is an inner feeling that only hurts inside ourselves, whether we have hate as a natural reaction of an action that happened. It is our own interpretation of how we conduct the feelings.
Personally, I do not believe that hate is necessary to outshow our yin and yang. On the contrary, I feel that hatress only feel our souls with negative energy and conducts us in a wrong way.
We have the power to make decisions in how we react to things but we do not have that so in the way we feel about. Because, at the end of the day, we do not decide or choose how we feel, we just do.
In addition, hating something only harms us and it takes up our energy and gives power to the problem which we are draining ourselves. We can choose to disregard whatever person, action or cause that made us upset and triggered our morals. Choosing to let go and focus on the positive things we like and have that a necessity of conducting ourselves.
In conclusion, I support the realization that the only individual you are prejudicing by having hatress or conducting it so, it is yourself. Therefore, you should choose not to hate anything or anyone; and just disregard it.

I believe that the tone in which we transmit our ideas is very important and it is a pivotal point that determines the effectiveness of the message that we want to deliver to our audience and see how the react to it. This has two following scenarios, they can either agree with what you say or they can disagree with your ideas.
I am not saying that there is a right or a wrong answer in this scenario, what I am trying to explain is that your tone in the way you deliver your speech has a high impact within your audience's reaction.
We all know, or should know by now, that climate change is a big threat to our planet and the environment where we live in, and that it is not a joke that could actually end the period of humanity and make our planet collapse their ecosystems making it unliveable for us human beings.
However, the way Greta Thunderbeg deliver her ideas in her speech is a to an extent very aggressive and harsh, accusing people that actually have no power over this fundamental problem.
First of all, Greta Thunberg uses social media platforms as a principal form of delivering her ideas and campaign or advocate for climate change; which we know digital platforms abuse the consumption of fossil fuels that harm and prejudice our environment, this shows an inconsistency with her views and advocating for actions to solve and help climate change.As she could be doing his movement with other campaign or platforms alternatives that would not harm the environment.
Second of all, the way in which her shows her graphic in correlation of growth economies and growth of climate change are very subjective and that is not actually the way our world works. Her being an eleven year old, it is not hard to see why she may not grasp certain concepts of statistics and data.