Having a point requires the subject or thinking of both parties be simple enough to confine to one dimension, the inner workings of the human mind and the discussion of such goings on to be constricted into a headline or topic which the rest of the information redefines would be rather silly. There is not a single thing in the universe which precisely moves from point A to B and humanity is under the illusion of lacking perception due to the limited hardware of the human system. Reality is a brilliant nonsensical circle near indescribable through linguistic methods and to prefer being lied to through point to point storytelling so as to FEEL as though you've understood, instead of an engaged dynamic field that is free from the constricts of linearity, is a rather silly, though common, habit. The whole "eventually language will be obsolete and direct transmission of ideas" thing. Nothing true has ever been spoken. So why try so hard to make it orderly.

Indeed they did, however the education system is utter garbage In the US at least in my area and most of what is taught is the improper useless version of what would be good info. Much of that had to be purged. And as I am now free from said mental corruption and English is subjectively of no interest to me I`m at somewhat of a loss as to how I feel I should conduct my speech. Also this isn't a paper, I had no "point", and I stated early that I wasn't speaking to be heard. I was ranting. There's more important things to study than a poorly crafted language imprecise and materially oriented with little possible translation into higher orders of knowledge, "god" doesn't` speak english, and humans are attempting to express an understanding that lies beneath verbiage that is often individual specific. I see little point in exerting the effort to be understood "final draft" in an area of discussion that requires discussion (back and forth) to even be understood. I also mentioned intuitive thinking which would obviously not have a clear and orderly "point" and if it did it wouldn't be intuitive, it would be linear and direct. Repeating the word also also is quite amusing. Also.

Eugenics is a rather lovely work around to controlling people wouldn't you say? I was speaking collectively about the ignorant hive mind of beings caught in the collective conscious bubble, anyone under a uncertain threshold of lacking awareness/intelligence I don't even deem to be human in the full sense. They possess the characteristics of a house pet with the unnerving ability to communicate. I saw you had a post about free will, it's my understanding free will is to be earned through the clearing out of mental programming most everyone is influenced by, and until said programming is uplifted you`re locked into following the orders of commands you didn't even know were given, and thus have no free will. I was in a rather heated mood when I posted originally and I don't expect anyone to be capable of translating into rational thought exactly what I had meant, but I do find the jabbing of psychological assessment to be amusing. Thanks for that.