The Philosophy Forum

  • Forum
  • Members
  • HELP

  • Does philosophy weaponize language?
    I disagree with my OP, philosophical language can be used as a weapon, but it's not a weapon in of itself.
  • Does philosophy weaponize language?
    I recall someone telling me quite a while ago that his father used to hit him with anything his pop could lay his hand's on. — TheMadFool
    I guess the moral of the story is that anything can be used as weapon...
  • Does philosophy weaponize language?
    ↪Noble Dust
    Im only interested in torch lighters. I don't like the cheap BIC stuff.
  • Does philosophy weaponize language?
    Yes, gas lighters do what they can by gas-lighting — Noble Dust
    The biggest gas-lighter in history is... Link
  • Does philosophy weaponize language?
    Nevermind. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument
  • Does philosophy weaponize language?
    ↪Banno
    How about "formal argument"?
  • Does philosophy weaponize language?
    Oh wait...

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/line%20of%20reasoning
  • Does philosophy weaponize language?
    lines of reasoning — Banno
    Is there another word for that?
  • Against Stupidity
  • Against Stupidity
    ↪Xtrix
  • Consequentialism
    consequentialism and deontological ethics are more about figuring out who to blame than how to decide how we should behave. — T Clark
    That right there is fuel for politicians.
  • Consequentialism
    ↪T Clark
    Very good. :up: :sparkle:
  • Against Stupidity
    Yeah, yeah yeah... :roll:
  • Against Stupidity
    ↪Newkomer

    Oh, look! A stupid game.
  • Against Stupidity
    ↪Wayfarer
    I need a marker to check all the stupid boxes!
  • Against Stupidity
    ↪Newkomer

    A stupid reaction!
  • Against Stupidity
    Trump being King of Stupid — Wayfarer

  • Against Stupidity
    This thread is stupid... :yawn:
  • Against Stupidity
    picked the wrong evil dictator — Wayfarer
    Damn right! Choose Mussolini next time!
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    ↪TenderBar
    That's fair.
  • Against Stupidity
    As an online discussion grows in the number of Hitler references, the probability of mentioning Godwin's law approaches 1? — Hermeticus
    No.

    https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/595014

    It was a joke.
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    ↪TenderBar


    Is Judaism an ethnicity? A race? A nationality?
  • Against Stupidity
    Internet adage asserting that as an online discussion grows longer (regardless of topic or scope), the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Adolf — Mike Godwin
    There ought to be another law about "Godwin"...
  • Stuff Thread
    https://latin.stackexchange.com/questions/5631/what-is-spam
  • Against Stupidity
    ↪Wayfarer
    We Americans have a totally different concept of stupidity.

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/stupid
  • Against Stupidity
    ↪Wayfarer
    Im being facetious.
  • Against Stupidity
    Hitler wasn’t stupid. — Wayfarer

    You said a good thing about Hitler! :rage:
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    That's an understatement. — TheMadFool
    I gave that one up as a bad job. Definition
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    Crap, now I sound like an Israeli. :nerd:
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    ↪TheMadFool
    It's hard to disentangle academia from politics, isn't it?
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    Yep, :ok: It's hard to tell the difference. I thought you had something on him. — TheMadFool
    Just mention/call all the anti-Israel people on this forum. lol

    There are a lot of them...
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    ↪TheMadFool
    Seriously, there's good and bad people from every country, including Israel.
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    I have nothing against Harari.
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    ↪TheMadFool
    No, I don't mean anything. You should just be careful that he might be biased because he's from Israel. That's all.
  • Anti-Vaxxers, Creationists, 9/11 Truthers, Climate Deniers, Flat-Earthers
    he has no interest in learning anything — Xtrix
    Don't say that. He might have a learning disability. :fear:
  • The Educational Philosophy Thread
    Very relevant today^^
  • The Educational Philosophy Thread
  • The Educational Philosophy Thread
  • Stuff Thread
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_dogs_of_war_(phrase)
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    Another useful concept: Hashem
Home » Wheatley
More Comments

Wheatley

Start FollowingSend a Message
  • About
  • Comments
  • Discussions
  • Uploads
  • Other sites we like
  • Social media
  • Terms of Service
  • Sign In
  • Created with PlushForums
  • © 2025 The Philosophy Forum