Obs: if reality cannot be understood in itself, by our mind and by our judgment, it cannot be studied in his relations. It is more than obvious.

Physics study some relations of reality, not reality itself.

Greentings.

"According to physics, the most fundamental stuff of science is fields, not particles."

Sounds very untrue, but the topic is very interesting.

I know absolutely nothing about modern physics, and very little about acient physics. But I doubt that physics can change our modality of being, or can increase our undestanding about what is real or not. Reality is the most stable thing in our lives and since we are humans, there is a reality; and, in essence, the same and always the same.

The knowledge of what is real or not do not depend of science, but depends of human capacity to understand reality. Reality is an object of understanting, not a object of knowledge, according with Hegel. And that's is obvious, no?

Genetically, no.

Statements are relatives to what you assume for real. If you assume nothing, no statement can be true.

Subject and object are valid ways of think certain relations of reality. But not all relations in reality can be defined by this two categories. The master and slave categories can not, for example. In the same way the marital relationship.

The categories of subject and object are scientifical categories, but not the only categories of scientific methodology.