Are most solutions in philosophy based on pre-philosophical notions/intuitions? Is Philosophy useful I think something that tends to happen with philosophy is that you loop back to where you started from, but afterwards you have a better understanding and less anxiety about whatever it was that you initially set off for. It is not a circle but more like a spiral, with the length of the spiral corresponding with your understanding.
This is not just with philosophy, this is just generally the way it is with anything you learn, but it's more apparent with philosophy because nothing seems to get agreed upon in the way it does with facts and theories in the sciences, or best practices in the arts and trades. With math you might learn basic arithmetic, and later down the road you learn about calculus and differential equations, and finally perhaps some abstract algebra, which brings you right back to the basic arithmetic you learned in 1st grade, but this time you have a deeper understanding of things than when you were five.
With Western philosophy there sort of seems to be three different periods, the initial dawning of naive theorizing, the systemic, super-rational philosophy of the scholastics up to the idealists, and then the disillusioned, bitter deconstruction of the failure of everything that happened. I think maybe
@180 Proof said something along the lines of this somewhere, but I don't really remember. I could see perhaps philosophy either entering a new phase, or looping back to its initial. Movements for both are happening right now. I think this gives philosophy a somewhat mystical fatalism though, and I've been reading Spengler, so take that with a grain of salt. I'm sort of just rambling right now anyway.
Then again
fucks folks like Feser think that underneath the history of philosophy resides a perennial tradition that more or less has got it right. In that case there is a more obvious sense of progress. Then again, maybe just stagnation.