Foolishness. — Gnostic Christian Bishop

I love you.

So said the master conqueror.

That is a title that can only be given to your insight. To label it yourself as holy shows a poor use of language and an over inflated ego. — Gnostic Christian Bishop

There are no bounds to my arrogance. Things are bound to be hard when I have to be tough about it. Only an over inflated ego could ever conquer the language in which I have proclaimed myself it.

Comprehension was not the issue. Equality of all our man made gods was. — Gnostic Christian Bishop

Comprehension is the issue in achieving a sense of that being now. I have made my point onto answering the question posed as the topic of this forum thread. All to the contribution of my holy insight.

That is one of it's highest forms of perfection as an ideology. — Gnostic Christian Bishop

From here your mind is a measure of however you want to know my Goddess or remain blatant in your attempts.

goddess above my god? — Gnostic Christian Bishop

Because until you know her, you cannot fully comprehend yourself. You are God. Not your God, but my God. It is the only God that comprehends.

Christians would not have murdered so many, even of their own brain dead ilk. — Gnostic Christian Bishop

I can not answer for the masses - only for their moral outcome.

Gnosis is the root word for agnostic. — Gnostic Christian Bishop

I hope you are distinct enough in your belief to know the difference between root and ground.

What attracts you to her? — Gnostic Christian Bishop

I am my God.

Why are the religious such ass holes? — Gnostic Christian Bishop

Because we know what we believe. Impact on us only affects to remedy the questions onto which angle we can further proclaim how that is in the unbelievers' eyes. There is no such thing as believing the wrong thing.

Humans are more than most think, but we are not supernatural. — Gnostic Christian Bishop

Then you are not above God in my meaning. I don't usually do this; but my God is better than your God. It does however entail your God as one with it. It's a precept of the Holy. No religion is beyond my God. All we ever do is to play with His toys. Insha'Allah.

There are no supernatural entities in Gnostic Christianity. — Gnostic Christian Bishop

So is Gnostic Christianity then an agnostic form of atheistic approach on Christianity? You know your brain doesn't have to be dead to utilize your heart indiscriminately, right? Why even filter what goes on in between?

Well, so is there one or are there two? — Nobeernolife

There is one - a model prospect for many. Who we are is the reality in which we first took wholesome responsibility for all of creation. Until we overcome that reality, things are bound to be confusing.

So you agree that the description of the two gods is contradictory. — Nobeernolife

I thought you already knew it and wasn't here for confirmation.

I am surprised you do not acknowledge your satanic side. — Gnostic Christian Bishop

Of course I do. I am a devout satanist.

One imaginary god approving of another imaginary god. — Gnostic Christian Bishop

I approve of all and I have no problems confining it to my sense of self.

We are not listening to each other in this time of babble. — Gnostic Christian Bishop

We do. We just have more to say than can be said in a single exchange of meaning. It's mostly the sounds of mind that obfuscates the light.

Satan or god, whoever you think those characters are? — Gnostic Christian Bishop

Of course, Satan is the spawn of God. I for one think it's hillarious. He lives next door.

Yes, so what? Everything Muhammad does is completely approved by Allah, so you can not use the excuse that he is human. — Nobeernolife

Approved. Not conducted. A world of difference.

We are all in this together, alone. — Gnostic Christian Bishop

Yes, but at least we have each other.

Heil religion. — Gnostic Christian Bishop

Hail DL

Regards,
EL

Your god is Satan, and you don't care. — Gnostic Christian Bishop

I am GOD and His name is Christmas. In my case it is an acronym for Goddess Of Divinity. That's my mom.

Yahweh is a prick and his followers have the same homophobic and misogynous fascist character. — Gnostic Christian Bishop

I follow Christ - not YHWH. Jesus was clear about it being his father. We are all one.

A god who can cure but chooses to kill is a prick. — Gnostic Christian Bishop

You know it. Never forget it's Shiva's prick.

Is that from Hitler or Stalin? — Gnostic Christian Bishop

I'm not sure. In this case it was from me. We probably all have an outlook on it. I enjoy loving them all. It becomes so beautiful when it all comes together. Like Lucifer.

pototo — christian2017

We can always laugh about it. I prefer it to waging war. Always be open to the minute differences.

potato — christian2017

So long as you know that's the word. I never criticise. I only ever conduce myself to fit in all places of every mind.

Are you saying conclude as in beginning adult hood. — christian2017

Yes. Absolutely.

That was what i was getting at earlier. — christian2017

I know. See why I also love hell?

Freedom is not an all or nothing thing and it never has at any point in history. — christian2017

Real freedom can never be obtained without ethical indignation to mark the true remarks of unity. We have to meet each other philosophically before we can face each other as equals. This is what the world is working for in all areas.

We believe what we believe — christian2017

Isn't that what it all comes down to in the end anyway? Sharing views is a predominant part in being conscious. I hear people with questions, I help myself to the answers to which end I know them. As we all are. The bickering isn't that fun in my view, but it sure beats drinking.

Love you,
EL

to wear a burka — christian2017

It is about spectrum. Not brain washing. Freedom goes both way.

Is there any sexual behavior that you would consider unethical? — christian2017

Non-consentual. When a child and God concludes adulthood in unison, consent can be given. Consent can only really be given on basis of the soul.

Doesn't this sound like brainwashing a person on the basis of religion for the purpose of blatant prostituion. — christian2017

It does.

That despite the emulation, Muhammad is not Allah.

In no way shape or form based on my understanding of the Bible do i find the god of the Bible, offensive. — christian2017

Let me clarify my take on the notion of your indignation, . I wholeheartedly concur with Christian. Would you rather have a fleeting moment of supreme suffering and an eternity of bliss, or an eternity of wibble wobble? If the latter is your honest to God sincere answer, then I conclude our separation and deem your indignation a single one of your wibble wobbles. Happy surfing.

You have not read your bible. Armageddon ring a bell? — Gnostic Christian Bishop

I have read the Bible and I know its pretext well. Let it ring a bell. Never confuse the method with the outcome.

modern hinduism — christian2017

I reckon in modern times it pertains to the same ideal, but by man's preconception of the times rather than the times themselves. Be and let be. Whatever holds to that standard I condone.

You want to serve, when Jesus said he came to serve — Gnostic Christian Bishop

Being a disciple of Jesus is nor about doing, nor either about being anything other than loving - no more than believing inconclusively is it.

Are you aware that mohomad was a sexual predator and that in many modern predominantly muslim nations, pedophilia is legal? — christian2017

Yes. It is important to not confuse the divinity of Allah with the humanity of Muhammad. Somewhere in there we have to find our own stand.

i asked you earlier about the subject of temple prostitiution but you didn't answer — christian2017

You did and I did answer elaborately. It's in another thread. We were talking about multiple things and I used them in contrast to each other to illuminate them both. Here goes;

"How do you feel about ancient temple prostitiution in ancient Iraq?"
— christian2017

Wow, you really touch ground here. I believe that the Latter Day Saints recognize that they do not understand a single thing about Kabbalah as it were and in regard strictly observe connections - to follow the light in its most intricate sense. It's a posture of humility.

Temple prostitution is a further inquiry into the very matter of the same manner. Metaphorically speaking it sort of entails being a prostitute in a sacred temple. Realizing that your ways are foul and therefore submitting wholly to the temple proceedings in order to boundlessly correct yourself. Thus; conclusion - prostitution in temples are bad but the metaphor is good.

When it comes to these particular cases, I think we have to look at each individually. It raises high and sinks low. Some might have considered it an honor an really embraced the unknowable purpose, in which case they would have faced God. Others would have not, in which case it was a sin - both pertaining to the victim and the perpetrator. Mainly because we cannot ever know which really is which. Knowing this and facing God would have been the same at that time.

John 21:17

I guess every god has its little faults and idiosyncrasies — Frank Apisa

Be and let be is my only decree.

It is a human fault to want to limit the height of God. God is above time, but can still entail change. God is above change. To stare yourself blind on any of those limitations is a human idiosyncrasy.

If a human tells a benevolent God - I am great. Then by God would I be a charletan if I did not incur the penalties upon those who'd make it any less. Who besides God dote exist? It is not dualistic. It is plain obedience both ways.

In what universe does that make sense? — Nobeernolife

could go either way — christian2017

It makes sense if Allah drunk the beer first after he passed down the Quran.