It depends on which value you hold tragedy to.
Tell me, do you believe you can lay your sense of tragedy to rest?

Thank you Mr Crank! So far this is the best genuine feedback and I am very humble in it.
I know you understand these words fully but I'm not sure if you can sense the underlined point of motivation to inspire others with these words. And if you can't than that's completely understandable because you already know this side.
And I understand that elevating religion pressures won't be the one all fix all for pain and suffering, but it is a start. To have faith in the faithful if I may.

Like I said thank you again for dissecting this rant of mine, I truly appreciate it :)

I have to agree with you Mr. Uncover. But we are speaking in the visual realm and not time. One can not see time but only understand it's understanding of how it effects the tree.
Thus if there is a general understanding of how that tree changes in time then it is not the tree that has changed but your perception of how time changes that tree.

You do indeed have a very valid point. But time was out of the question.

The realization of life can only be understood if one understands death. For that is the only sense of messurement. So to say one can fully understand life he must indeed understand death in its fullest.

I have to agree with you fully sir.
However I do indeed believe that this knowledge of ignorance can be educated if that approach is taken carefully with a humble sense of teaching. The information sharing in todays society is far more advanced opposed to Socrates time. Which can be a tool of self empowerment in which we already know to be true.

And you are right about the scorning. It is very prevalent in my friends and family. I can only humbly accept this as a step forward. It is the most challenging step and possibly the only step. But who are we not to strive to take that step in the first place?

The tree is the same but your perspective has changed, and in that changed perspective you can learn more from the tree thus giving it a different perception and understanding.

I would say that isolated statements do hold truth, if the sender perceives there statement true regardless if there is a receiver or not.

Maybe it's how a certain group of people identify each other without asking. It's almost as a form of unofficial dialect. For only those who understand the words fluently can understand the how important it is to the transmitter of which the words are used and placed.

Just because you can does not mean you should, right guys? I think this falls into responsibly.

I have to say that in what context you classify the object plays a major part in the communication.
In how the receiving end of that communication perceives "heavy" is how it shall be measured in.