But everything I said other than the dream is accepted society theory of the subjects at hand namley thoughts and emotions and how the human brain and nerves work ;/

Very well put I'm not writing anything tonight I don't think going to bed But I will try to write a lecture here when I can.

Idk to me that's crazy like millions of people died for my freedom my rights and yours and just because I can't have Free stuff I'm going to steal yours ? Stealing to eat and stealing because your mad are two different things too me yeah I'm gonna call you out if you have privledges but I'm not going to make you suffer like me I'm not the type of person who wants you to experience my suffering only to understand it as best I can articulate it too you.

I think it certianly does against all groups or races of peoples including white people I can only offer a point of view but I see all the Pro Black groups to help black people and raise them out of poverty and not just blacks almost all other groups of people's and yet a pro white group does not exist officially in this country my theory is that people want to take other people's rights away because it's easier and slowly we are all taking each others rights away instead of fighting for those same rights for everyone or ourselves we become spiteful because it's hard and give up because it is hard and we take the easy route and take those rights away that were fought for already and that is were society has gone wrong .

Sure they have gay parades that cost millions I say we take them same amount of money hire tons of female escorts and have an orgy straight pride day !! Equal rights

You have to believe that your thoughts are electrical chemical signals in your brain that's it that's what you are with some muscle memory which is your brain so when you dream is it possible it's someone else's chemical reactions from another lifetime what makes your thoughts unique what makes it yours so emotions a nerve reactions in the process crazy right

Right but let's look at that what I'm saying is for there to be society you need atleast 2 rational people that means they compromise on some things that's the rational part now so I think most people would agree while it may be said that it was evil that the disaster killed a person but that if society then entered a debate the only reasonable course of action would be to admit that perhaps is was not the disaster. now if what your implying is historical then perhaps they would say the gods were angry or evil was being punished evil was wrought by the volcano but never the volcano was evil so I cannot fathom why I'm even answering this but perhaps this is my duty to society certianly freedom involves setting others around you free if you can.

Do I think it's likely no

since I believe all the information to cure the virus already exists in various forms be it elements atoms electrons ect ect yes under the parameters you've given I suppose it is what if the paint had the cure in it and you breathed it in might be abit extreme but certainly cannot rule it out .

Which removes it as a philosophy.

Well I think that would be very neglectful for any philosophy to involve generalities such as a flood being evil without giving it parameters to test but perhaps it has caused an evil or evil perspective but if we take that statement of " the earthquake was evil it killed my mom" I think most rational members of society would not accept that as fact .

It's one of the ten commandment and in the courts it comes from Anglo law or Vikings whom took purgery or giving their word very serious

Purgery is one of the oldest crimes predates murder and is an evil in all religions ancient pagans ones Semitic ones ect ect

I honestly cannot say if Evil is a law of nature like I said there is two sides to every story what I do know is freedom and fate are tied together some might say fate is not real but I would argue it's much realer than evil. Thomas Boston says Satans power is very limited on earth it says so in the Bible and that God makes the crook in the lot or "evil" so that we may learn from it and fight it when we become "good" so there is no good or evil simply gods will or nature's law he's trying to teach you how to be stronger so you don't get taken advantage of. How can a good person fight evil ? He can't he's naive and would be destroyed so there is no good and evil, however if the universe has freewill why do we all have to lie how can we believe in gods sovereignty and claim freewill so you see fate is simply knowing all the facts if we see the whole we know the outcome so by lying we are denying each others freedom and fate. Hope that help my friend.

I'm of the opinion that all the information is already there and we are actually losing it if you look at science it all comes from nature some quick examples is dna it's actually information that evolves from our environment not the other way around all the chemical reactions like amino acids and the sun already existed and simply needed to right conditions to form and not the other way around now if we look at more primative things animals chew sticks the make spears they have horns tusks it's a natural occurance also if we look at hybrids it's actually a loss of genetic material in almost all cases if you take two plants of a fruit for example if it gives us a million seeds from crossbreeding almost all of the seeds will be of inferior quality you actually lose 50 percent of genetic material from both plants they do not gain material you must grow all the seeds to maturity to find your "diamond in the dirt" and you must take seeds and continue the cycle so while the written language has allowed us to make great advances it's also very limited in what we can do with it because of its origins and early works example most European writing actually comes from one source Homer of ancient Greece now we find that perhaps in the workplace you might start a job and someone teaches you the proper way to do it but sometimes I find if we try to learn the job and then are shown the right way after some time youll learn a small trick that nobody else learned simply by doing it wrong , or perhaps another example you can go to school and learn from the best and not understand at all until you begin to apply what you've learned in practice then the theory begins to make sense and you learn in this manner .

It doesn't take faith to believe natures law is almost inseperable from God will I suggest you start with "the crook in the lot" by Thomas Boston
And I'd be willing to have a talk with you.

That is to say the only act that could be considered truley evil without another answer another side of the story is to knowingly lie because that is the only real choice you have is to lie the rest is fate there cannot be freedom without fate without knowing everything you simply cannot be evil based on any single act from any single perspective there's almost always 2 arguments if not more, so the only real evil is to knowingly tell a lie .

Forgive me Im new and don't study evil but for me we would have to start with a definition and since we likely have no real origin of the word lost to time I'd go with the current which would be the lack of good or a villian it has been said no person can be wholly evil or good as it cannot be done all the time the nature of things dictate then that an evil must be an act . Now what parameter are required for an act to be evil , what is evil must be perspective based on environment and learned experiences example ,is it an evil commit the ultimate evil act to stop evil ?to play a trick or set a trap ?to be evil can be summed up as avoiding confrontation perhaps often associated with darkness which is another argument I will not be writing an essay on at this time but from what I know is that you choose to act unaturallly that you choose to lie is the simpalist way to avoid this actual lecture is to sum up evil as to knowingly lie .