Interesting approach. What kind of general syntax applies to proof telling? — Shawn

Be it Gödel or Heisenberg, infinite variables can not be overcome by infinite description,
there must be a corner around which the pursuit changes velocity.

Theory of Nothingness
''Rather the starting point, the un-caused Cause, is Possibility which is both Something and Nothing and the basis of Probability.'' Marvin Glover

Well I've been set straight, all dems honest, all repubs dishonest.
This is why I do not rely on posts.
I only rely on videos and audios of the actual subjects.
I believe politics and media has become synonymous with organized crime.

The only part of conspiracy theory that is questionable is two or more people.
If an individual murders a person, (oh I don't know, Seth Rich for example)
and Seth had access to all of the dnc emails, and was very angry that his candidate
(Bernie Sanders) was screwed by the dnc, that may be worth investigating.
The fact that Seth's screen name was Panda and Hillary was recorded in a speach saying sometimes you have to kill the Panda (holding the Ming vase) two nights before!
and the fact that assange and several others have given accounts of the transfere of Emails
from Rich to Wikileaks as well as the fact that his murder was considered a robbery and nothing
was taken.
and even though a group of america's most respected retired intelligence officials
stated that the download was too fast to have happened from outside the building.
Yea, it must have been the Russians.. The veil of Ignorance approach
Or maybe there should have been an Investigation?

In as short as possible, would it be possible to entertain the notion that complexity in non-congruent — Shawn W

Might I suggest that this question is about syntax and not math?
simplicity vs. complexity

John Archibald Wheeler's participatory anthropic principle says that consciousness plays some role in bringing the universe into existence.(Interpretations)

Modal interpretations of quantum mechanics were first conceived of in 1972 by Bas van Fraassen, in his paper "A formal approach to the philosophy of science."(Interpretations)

I think therefore I am; Thinking is not a physical property therefore physical existence is not proven!

By no means do I consider myself a "philosopher".

'the study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence'
from the moment of birth the studying begins
it is important to know others opinions but remember
more and more about less and less
soon you know everything there is about nothing at all
not an effort to insult, just simple and honest

It has also been proven that the observation changes the object being observed.
In other words, the observation changes the outcome of an observation.

" By that, I mean that changing the interpretation doesn't change the outcome of an observation or experiment. If I am mistaken about this, I would appreciate it if someone would correct me."

atomic or sub atomic observations?
What they are observing is a reaction to an experiment designed to simulate theories.
all theoretical physics is just that!
all theory is logic and methods of reasoning.
Therefore all theoretical science is philosophy
Hence Phd (dr. of Philosophy) in Science

The Evil exists in the nature, scope, or meaning of intent.
In the 70's outrage over children institutionalizing parents to control their finances led to laws that were very well meaning. Unfortunately an abundance of Evil lawyers created environments where mentally ill
persons can not be protected. i.e. homeless, elder scams etc.
My father in alzheimer's care broke a hip. Not knowing it was broken he broke the other hip.
Because of the law they were not allowed to restrain him in any manner to protect him.
He spent the last three years of his life in and out of hospice so that they could administer enough drugs to keep him from injuring himself 24 hours a day.
Everyone had good intent and everyone suffered the consequences.

With the number of murderers, rapists, and thieves that we pass on the street on any given day?
I fear the rage directed at benign actions!
It blinds us to the question, ''Which organized crime family did you vote for?''

75 million voters silenced and ridiculed
re-education camps will have to outsource to China
someone should see how they feel about religious freedom and gender neutrality
Joe will have some splainin to do to the squad
cause he's good at splainin

I like where you are going with this.
The most important thing is to confirm each persons understanding of the subject and predicate.
I have seen a room full of 30 year old dungeon and dragon enthusiasts debate this very topic
with great enthusiasm .
Silly, but it hones their listening skills, creativity, and humor.
and they are very strict about the premise and the (facts) that are created on the spot and must be incorporated.

Magicians perform misdirection which is also common in nature.
a mirage or rainbow can be explained
does that make them any less real?

when you get a Phd in science it stands for doctor of Philosophy.
If you use logic or reason then you are using philosophy.

Randomness alone is aimless; but AI computers also use random heuristic searches to find forms that meet the intended criteria specified by the programmer. — Gnomon

Years ago I read a theory of how seeds have taught people to be farmers.
as they carried grain back to camp it spilled and sprouted along the trail
as it sprouted they moved the trail and created rows watered by spilled water from the nearest source.
Perhaps artificial intelligence is the seed,
Or the tail wagging the dog

I engaged in mockery when the internet began.
short lived
when I realized how easy it was to anger and malign others I felt guilt.
Those who connect with me do not need to acknowledge,
it becomes obvious

BTW, Collusion happened, so it almost by definition is not a conspiracy theory. — hypericin

The party that purchased the Russian disinformation (Steele dossier) colluded with Russia.
at least 74 million voters agree

Great reply, very thoughtful, but not a conspiracy. — hypericin

hypericin
what lofty aspiration does one have to reach to be a conspiracy
or are you saying that it was a blatant lie

I love to read personalities
by your name and one paragraph I know if I want to read more
quite often I see comments that inspire me
more often I move on

anyone that has locked eyes with another across the room knows,
that is the most powerful energy that exists

Russian Collusion

Origional in french
( je pense, donc je suis )
"we cannot doubt of our existence while we doubt."

Antoine Léonard Thomas, aptly captures Descartes's intent: dubito, ergo cogito, ergo sum ("I doubt, therefore I think, therefore I am").

Historical accuracy is not important
Physical existence is as important as history
What is Latin for Reality

Been a farmer for over 60 years.
this is enlightening

Synesthesia
Of the five senses no two people are exactly the same.
Overlapping of senses and sensory training is bizarre
Oliver Sacks (the author) makes some sense of it

No, gender has been used to decide roles in societies, but not based on physical abilities but the needs of the society. Strong women would have been warriors and wimpy men would have been maids if only the physical abilities had been taken into account — Sir2u

In no way am I suggesting that gender identification is correct,
However it appears you say No, and then agree with me.
Societal beliefs are not my belief

Walk toward the bright light means to give into death
Interesting that no two people have the same response to this either

Pain and pride are things that cannot be eliminated because they serve a very important part of life. — Sir2u

We are speaking of afterlife!

Me thinks you are reincarnated

I debate therefore I appreciate

Descartes was French and I doubt that the conversion to English is exact.
I think therefore I am is simplicity redundancy
Simple, easy for everyone to understand, and a summation of the human philosophical condition.
Can't argue with it because it says nothing.
Is a thought a physical thing?
Is he saying I think therefore I am not physical?

Gnomon
Neutrinos are things that travel through my vacuum
Their existence is recognized by their effect
Much like human interaction
One doesn't have to be visible to have an impact

Philosophy
the rules of debate
Methods of reasoning

Colin
The energy vampire
What we do in the shadows

Many, many people have had (near death experiences)
and many have had (hallucinations that include sensory experiences).
The reason there isn't more exposure of near death experiences is fear of suicide or giving up.
The actual experience is beautiful and motivating, however it can not be explained because we
are so dependent on our senses.
It has been said that our most enlightened state is the moment of birth,
before we become dependent on our senses.

Please explain this. I cannot see the connection between sensory capacity and gender specification.
Sir2u

Our need for gender identification is to define their role based on their physical abilities.
Without physical advantages or restrictions we eliminate judgement, pain, pride, etc.
It also makes it nearly impossible to explain what comes after the bright light.

Oliver sacks wrote of medical imaging and studies that prove 90% of what we see is generated from memory.
If you consider angle of vision and the infinite obstructions as well as pre existing prejudice,
reality would appear to be a consensus.

did you see that? followed by description

also the particles in your line of vision usually mean that
(if you could see everything, you could see nothing) just the particles floating in the
mucosal lining of the eye.
Each morning I watch the sun rise over a pristine mountain range and within 15 min. it completely disappears behind smog. fact

I consider philosophy a method of Reasoning
a set of rules that do not change
different philosophies suggest different realities
unless you can agree on concrete facts discussion is futile

Isn't it sad that our concept of god must fit male or female?
perhaps heaven is the absence of sensory frustration.

In Physics, "virtual" describes the mathematical or statistical state of a waveform in a field before it is actualized as a particle.

(seek and ye shall find) not religious, an effort to appease the church

The term “Virtual” in physics is analogous to “Spiritual” in meta-physics.
Quantum entanglement may not be so spooky albert!

Science can not exist without philosophy
Without logic science is just data!
in Quantum physics energy equals matter, quantum entanglement and uncertainty theory rule.