Michael Ossipoff         
         
Michael Ossipoff         
         
fdrake         
         
S         
         
Streetlight         
         
unenlightened         
         to artificially inseminate pigs with chimp semen to test it, the author certainly didn't bother. — fdrake
fdrake         
         
Baden         
         
S         
         Try a less controversial thread.
What is the evidence of inter-ordinal hybridization in nature. Do not mention pig chimp sexual relations. Do not mention McCarthy. — Nils Loc
unenlightened         
         
fdrake         
         
Michael Ossipoff         
         I'm sure the only reason that it was removed from the science category into the lounge was because no pigs were artificially inseminated with chimp semen. — fdrake
Or alternatively you can look at PZ Myers completely destroying every part of the claim.
You may as well have linked a flat earth 'research paper', it's in the same league of ridiculousness.
But by all means, get a Kickstarter going to artificially inseminate pigs with chimp semen to test it, the author certainly didn't bother.
S         
         Is that your expert professional opinion as a genetics PhD? — Michael Ossipoff
Terrapin Station         
         
fdrake         
         Myers' "demolishing" consisted of name-calling, angry-noises, and unsupported personal-opinion. — Michael Ossipoff
Michael Ossipoff         
         What is the evidence of inter-ordinal hybridization in nature. Do not mention pig chimp sexual relations. — Nils Loc
Nils Loc         
         No one denies that survivable fertile offspring from inter-order hybridization is, if possible at all, very, very improbable and rare.
So, sorry there aren't more instances of evidence. — Michael Ossipoff
fdrake         
         No one denies that survivable fertile offspring from inter-order hybridization is, if possible at all, very, very improbable and rare. — Michael Ossipoff
Michael Ossipoff         
         Therefore the theory being right is highly improbable. — Nils Loc
Terrapin Station         
         
unenlightened         
         It's more problematic when there's no good reason to believe that they're qualified to do so. — Terrapin Station
Michael Ossipoff         
         Which is funny because people have babies a lot. — fdrake
Terrapin Station         
         If God was in charge, we could all rest easy in our armchairs, but alas moderators always have to make judgements they are not qualified for, and so we have feedback for their education and improvement. — unenlightened
fdrake         
         
Michael Ossipoff         
         And refuting the morphological argument in the paper, and an analysis on chromosomal compatibility which strongly suggests that the pairing couldn't bring offspring at all, never mind fertile offspring.
The reason Myers got to be so insulting is because he thoroughly refuted the claims — fdrake
T Clark         
         It's problematic to have moderators make moderation judgments about content--that is, the philosophical, scientific, etc. merit of anything--even if there's reason to believe that they're qualified to do so.
It's more problematic when there's no good reason to believe that they're qualified to do so.
Let the participants sort out for themselves whether they feel anything has merit. The moderators should be primarily getting rid of spam a la advertising, things like people flooding the board with threads, etc. — Terrapin Station
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.