There's a reading group on r/Nietzsche for Geneology of Morals starting mid-May. I think there are about 10 people showing interest. If half that many actually show up it will be a pretty good group. — frank
There does not appear to be a groundswell of interest in that book here but it can be found at memory of the world library. — Valentinus
...what is being approached is how to understand our experience of the demonic in ourselves and others. — Valentinus
It can be daunting to undertake. On the other hand, the efforts made by Reidar Thomte and Albert Anderson to bring this web of connections in view through the footnotes is one of the best introductions to it. — Valentinus
Why do you consider it 'gold'? — Amity
The sites that let you read almost any philosophy work for free are gold! I guess most people know them anyway. — emancipate
I vote for Fear and Trembling, but am open to whatever, but let's choose something because the debate about what to choose and how to choose will likely go on for pages if we let it. — Hanover
That's not the specifics. That's the generalities. The specifics would be you designating which book we're going to read and your declaring yourself the moderator. — Hanover
The leader just kind acts as a moderator and hopefully knows the specifics of the book to some degree. Furthermore, he or she can correct others where they may have gone wrong. — Wallows
Have parallel threads ? — Amity
The mods hate that — Wallows
this thread is just to gather interest and asses what book to be read. — Wallows
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.