arguing against people being genetically equal is pretty much a taboo and you get almost immediate social repercussions for it… There aren't that many ways to truly get cancelled on the internet and the community becoming a hostile and silencing force against you… But on this issue, irregardless of the fact that there is nothing close to a scientific consensus on the issue, and that there are obvious arguments for either side, if you argue for inequality, you get labeled a racist and/or sexist and cancelled quicker than for any other issue. — Qmeri
nor did i specify my stances on the issue anymore than that i do think inequality is a problem — Qmeri
It seems like you didnt understand the subject... the text clearly didnt talk about whether or not people are inequal... it talks about the methods modern equality movement uses and how discourse on the topic of equality has changed. — Qmeri
When did I make a case that racial differences in intelligence or other characteristics are genetic? — Qmeri
These comment are proving the bad methodologies of modern equality movement way faster than I though. — Qmeri
I wasnt trying to bait people to prove the point of my text, — Qmeri
You wrote that "arguing against people being genetically equal" is taboo. You used that as an example of lack of respect for freedom of speech, which you indicate is a bad thing. How have I misrepresented that? What am I missing? — T Clark
As I noted, this subject gets people going. I don't think my response showed any "bad methodologies." — T Clark
I think you were being knowingly provocative. Not necessarily anything wrong with that, but what were you expecting? — T Clark
Given that history and present day conditions, why is it important to you to make the case that racial differences in intelligence or other characteristics are genetic? — T Clark
Not to us when "freedom of speech" is used by members of those communities which benefit from systemic inequality to silence or shame or create a hostile (work, school, public) environment for those members of communities which do not benefit from systemic inequality.Freedom of speech will always be more important than equality. — Qmeri
:100:OP: Wants freedom on speech
Also OP: Gets mad when people exercise it to tell bigots to STFU. — StreetlightX
Free speech is free speech. If you want to whine about people using their free speech to oppose your peddling of pseudo-scientific gene garbage, then you don't care about free speech. You just want free speech for the speech you like, while you ramble endlessly about speech you don't. — StreetlightX
Freedom of speech will always be more important than equality — Qmeri
inferior or superior genes. — StreetlightX
For instance, advocating to kill people for their liver if you need a liver transplant. — god must be atheist
"do societal ethical claims have the ethical right to exclude and stop that area of research the findings of which would undermine the very same ethical considerations, — god must be atheist
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.