The writer of the linked article being a far right supporter I wonder what it is he wants to say.

capitalism that grew out of slavery. — unenlightened

Slavery has never been as refined and hypocrite as nowadays. It wears a deceiving free world mask.

Well, the 6d structure is static too and the 3d particles move through it, but it offers a naturally appearing Planck scale, Lorenz invariant (which is sought after in modern physics).

Two particles never can get closer than a Planck length. What's the distance between two circles on top of each other?

am not suggesting an anthropomorphic 'first cause.' I am suggesting a mindless spark that is gone in the same way that the spark of a flame is gone. — universeness

Which is equivalent to the gods believe. It's a believe. Do you have proof for this spark, magically appearing out of nowhere?

You cant have a cylinder or a radius or a circle in 1D space (lineland — universeness

Imagine a cylinder. From afar it's 1d. A circle in it has only one direction to move in. Same for an S1xS1xS1 structure in 3d : three directions to move in. So the particle is a tiny geometrical structure. Which can be filled with charge.

A mindless first spark? :chin:

But it's only one way, I asked you why it's a better way than string theories 10 spatial dimensions and you have not answered me. — universeness

In string theory, the 10d structure is a static one. The partiicles themselves are strings and branes moving through it, and that's where the trouble starts. Just imagine the 5d Kaluza -Klein case...

Yes! So what's the problem?

All of us, black and white, and yellow, and red, are stuck with the mad inventions of a bunch of white guys and the tradition started in ancient Greek.

On closer inspection, X can come to be at t. Like that! Not being there one moment and being there the next moment. Now what?

If X belongs to the half closed interval [t, inf) and lays just outside the half open (-inf, t), then no problemo signor!

Less than 1% of all mathematicians is Afro-American. Mary Jackson and David Blackwell are among the best!

T2? What about it? X came into being at T2? At T2. But at t2 it disappears into the other direction. So what happents at t2. Is X existent or non-existent? Both! How can that be?

You are going too far now, I only said that god never gets capitalized — Sir2u

his son got Capital punishment! We're drifting off...

Okay, serious now. I can see I have bad influence! I politely back off! Continue.

:rofl:

sAy agAin: gOD sUcks!

"these neighborhoods have significant numbers of racial and ethnic minorities"

How mathematical is that already? :lol:

:rofl:

sAY AGAIN! sCrew gOD!

Denied. :rofl: — 180 Proof

:rofl:

You don't think that there is a history of numbers and god does not exist, so where did numbers come from. — Sir2u

It's not about numbers but what the mathematicians, mainly white did with them. Just look at the history of math. There are excellent black physicist or mathematicians, but they are by far in the minority. It's got a white aura.

And why do you capitalize the name of a none existent being? — Sir2u

That's normally done at the beginning of a sentence. Jesus....

Common sense is enforcing math in school — Sir2u

Well, then you have a different common sense. Of course white folks and blacks have the same potential. But math is a white invention. That can't be denied!

Jesus, 10 replies in one minute! Touchy subject. How can that be...? Personal assault?

Troll somewhere else. — 180 Proof

Is that all you got?

You don't think god gave us numbers do you? — Sir2u

How so? God doesn't exist.

Now I am considered racist, while it's white supremacy enforcing math at our schools.

Just look at the true history of numbers — Sir2u

"Thee true history of numbers,"? As if such exists...

The facts don't lie.

How racist is that statement.. — whollyrolling

It's a fact.

Genetic fallacy. — 180 Proof

Might be, but Gauss, Hamilton, Lorenz, Lagrange, Cauchy, etc. Were white, if I remember correctly. Where are the blacks? And why there is a relative small number at university? I'm not saying they are not able.

Just look at the history of math. Mainly white folks.

The tool itself is a white invention. Neil deGrasse is a deserter.

2 + 2 = white? Nope. — whollyrolling

2+2=4 is an invention made by white folks. That's why the number of white mathematicians is relatively much higher than the number of black mathematicians. Black people see the madness of 2+2=4, or integrals in general.

There's a time - t1 - when X does not exist. Right? Got that? Then there's a time - t2 - when X does exist. Understand? X doesn't exist at t1. X does exist at t2. So...X came into existence. Yes? — Bartricks

Then at what time it came into existence? That time lays between t1 and t2, right? But what at the creation moment itself? What about it? Where does it come from? There is no before and after. Is it there or not?

Math is mainly white. The number of white mathematicians vs. black mathematicians doesn't reflect the true ratio. Same for physicists.

with no wave function collapse — noAxioms

The problem in MWI is shifted towards the branching points. Tegmark's view suffers from the question what math structures are made of of approximations. If no exact solutions exist, what's the structure?

I have looked hard but nowhere have found Newton's law! Only in a book. And it's not even true. Like QFT nor GR are true.

I think it's the white's people free market capitalist system that is imposed via math. Money and quantities of it are involved? The "Jane buys 10 products at costprice..." kinds of problems. To which also the whites get exposed though.

Where can we find them than? I can see the laws of quantum field theory or general relativity written anywhere but in the law books of physics.

. But it is fallacious to argue they must come from a lawmaker, because they are laws — hypericin

Didn't we make the "physical law"?

Like a buffoon in English? Anyhow, no bad intention meant. I thought it meant someone who makes things bigger, like from "trinity" to "billionty", which sounds rather funny.

You are conflating legal "laws" with physical "laws" — hypericin

Then where does the physical law come from?