↪believenothing
"Doesn't that mean you are implying that at least in some places there is an absence of nothing?"
Well yes obviously, every place where something exists that is not nothing.. — Myttenar
"I believe an error is made when the idea of 0 is being regarded as a quantifiable object instead of a frame of reference." — Myttenar
"The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" — Myttenar
And I'm just going to point out here that nothing is, in fact not everywhere. — Myttenar
(I agree in some cases) But.."The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" — Myttenar
Things are. Nothing is not. "what is nothing" is a meaningless question like what is the colour of F-sharp, Or what does blue sound like.
Things have properties. Nothing has no properties, as having is a property of existing. Things exist; nothing does not exist and has no properties. Not having a property is not a property. — charleton
So, N is neither mental nor physical. It can't be a thought and neither is it a physical object. — TheMadFool
To say "nothing" exists is in itself a fallacy as nothing carries the definition as being the opposite of "something " which we can quantify. — Myttenar
. Since nothing had been defined as having no properties by assigning value it is no longer nothing by definition. — Myttenar
Not much of a point saying this, but if you added nothing to every location, would you really be changing anything? I mean how could anyone know that nothing is not everywhere unless an example could be proven for which it is impossible to add nothing? I believe if it can happen it will or it already has.And I'm just going to point out here that nothing is, in fact not everywhere. — Myttenar
doesn't it confuse you when you quantify N and realize that you have assigned it a property and it ceases to exist? — Myttenar
In what other way can we make sense of N?
What other properties of N are there? — TheMadFool