Comments

  • Kierkegaard and Regine Olsen's Love
    I don't understand what you're saying. Sorry.
  • Kierkegaard and Regine Olsen's Love
    Do you think that an attempt for forgiveness meant a regret on part of the person seeking this forgiveness?TimeLine

    No. I was once madly in love with a melancholic. It didn't help at all that I am myself and so understood. It's kind of like this:

  • Saudi arms trade bites back.
    Why did the U.S go into Iraq, no commies, or strategic oil there?
    Did this light the fuse in the Middle East and since then it's been a fire fighting exercise?
    Punshhh

    This story is at least 75% true:

    The strategy part came from a guy named Wolfowitz. He had worked in SE Asia and witnessed a democracy-domino effect there. He thought the US would benefit if the MIddle East would go through a similar democratization.

    Supposedly the people who blew up the world trade center were Saudis who were frustrated with their own government. They wanted reform, but it seemed impossible. So they lashed out at one of Saudi's most important allies: the US. Wolfowitz thought that if the whole Middle East could move toward democracy, then frustrated individuals could exhaust their energies in democratic wrangling instead of attacking the US and creating jolts to the US economy. He explained this publicly after the invasion.

    This was a reversal in US foreign policy announced by GW Bush in a state of the union address where he identified and "axis of evil." During the Cold War, the US had a policy of "siding with the bad against the worse," IOW being indiscriminate about allies. On top of that, oil companies said it would be easier for them to deal with corrupt monarchies than with democratic countries, so there was impetus to maintain the status quo.

    Another factor was the presence of a guy named Rumsfeld. He was the type of shithead who shows up to facilitate war because he knows how to profit from it. It wasn't too hard to facilitate it, though, because the US has a standing army waiting to be exercised, and 911 galvanized the American population.

    There's another thing that I think happened. It was reported by a CIA agent on CNN. He said that after 911, the CIA received information that there was a suitcase bomb in NYC. The info had been received from two independent sources (Russia and Pakistan.) He said the thinking was that if there was a bomb in NY, there could be ones in Chicago and LA. As time went by and no radioactive bomb went off in NY, they decided that it had been a lie, but the need to find some action that would calm terrorists down became a high priority. I wasn't sure about this story until I heard Bill Clinton allude to that scenario. As he spoke, I became pretty confident that he believed it had happened.

    The invasion of Iraq was intended to begin a process of replacing monarchies with democracies. It was a bold plan executed with a high degree of cluelessness. In order to work, the plan would require that Middle Easterners take up the cause themselves.

    The outcome of the Arab-Spring and the devastation of Syria testify that Wolfowitz was wrong. The Middle East is not going to become democratic. Ironically, the belief (held by Bush) that we're all basically the same and want the same things turned out to be wrong. It was quasi-racist, anti-Islamic, in some cases Zionist fanatics, who said the MIddle East can't be democratized. Turns out they were right. :(

    After 911, I struggled to understand the motives of the attackers. A friend told me I was over-thinking it. There are just some bloody-minded people in the world. They're going to do some damage if they can. My intuition is that my friend is right.
  • Kierkegaard and Regine Olsen's Love
    I think what he did with the experience has more to do with volition and acceptance.

    We witness a being who has no personal identity. The Will of the universe flows through him unmuddied by attachment or aversion.

    "...Great by virtue of a love which is hatred of oneself."
  • Kierkegaard and Regine Olsen's Love
    Indeed Kierkegaard's whole corpus can be regarded as an attempt to justify himself.Agustino

    Probably his most powerful works exploded out of the crisis surrounding that. His whole corpus? A lot of it is about the death of Christianity, so... I don't think so.

    "There was one who was great by virtue of his power. One who was great by virtue of his wisdom. One who was great by virtue of hope. And one who was great by virtue of his love. But Abraham was greater than these. Great by virtue of power which is impotence. Great by virtue of wisdom whose secret is foolishness. Great by virtue of hope that takes the form of madness. And great by virtue of a love which is hatred of oneself."

    Regine? She's a long way off from here. He gave her up because he knew he would have been miserable with her... and so she would have been miserable too. That's what I think.
  • Discussion: Three Types of Atheism
    I think it was "I'm fine with nihilsm. It's not a problem. Really. What is nihilism again?"
  • That's a Cool Comment
    Indeed, Plato is the greatest mythmaker, precisely because he understood the value of myths and the limits of human discourse.Mariner
  • A fool's paradox
    I gather you've never been possessed.
  • Is Putin doing a good job?
    I agree that Christianity has an affinity for socialism. Maybe that explains it.
  • Is Putin doing a good job?
    Weirdly, there are Christian Communists in Russia.
  • A fool's paradox
    Judgement is one side and Understanding on the other. Spend too much time at either extreme and you become a nutcase.
  • What will Mueller discover?
    What will be discovered is that Trump did not collude with the RussiansHanover

    I'm actually interested in how you came to this conclusion, but since you've turned radioactive again... nevermind.
  • A fool's paradox
    I once paced back and forth all night long trying to figure out if the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was moral or immoral.

    Out of it fell this notion of pre-event and post-event perspectives. Pre-event is characterized by Eros, a pure drive to live, and post-event is the domain of judgment and morality. I held to that outlook for years, but it started disintegrating in the light of Nietzsche.

    I tell all this to explain that I didn't pace that night because I was reaching out for happiness. I didn't have any choice. The question had me in its hands. I was driven to try to understand.

    And this is typical of the pre-event perspective: one is driven to act. Morality is about assessing how well it went. :)
  • Causality
    Isn't the obvious modern correlate of "final cause" "purpose"?Srap Tasmaner

    Seems right to me. The final cause of a heartbeat is to create blood pressure. Final cause answers: for what? It's pervasively used in biology.
  • What will Mueller discover?
    I was agreeing with you.
  • What will Mueller discover?
    No. It will never be repaid.
  • What will Mueller discover?
    The Marshall Plan was specifically intended to get the B. Empire back up and running. There was a bit of a secret crisis in the US government when people started realizing B wasn't coming back. A study was conducted to determine how much money it would take for the US to take B's place. The study said it was uncountable.

    One of the best books about that whole scene from an American perspective is The Fifty Year Wound by Derek Leibert.
  • Art, Truth, Bulls, Fearlessness & Pissing Pugs
    That's how I feel about the girl though: What's she doing there?

    The corporate style campaign that commissioned the girl was trying to promote feminism. Perhaps the bull represents the evil patriarchy, and hence the girl makes sense, but I don't think so.

    Let's discuss it publicly though, and if it means that much to us let's let our public representatives and local officials know how we feel about it and what we think the monument ought to portray. If it was really that big of a deal, we could even have a series of votes to settle it!
    VagabondSpectre

    I don't share your perspective on the bull. It doesn't even register as art to me. It looks like something from some beer advertisement.

    Life can sometimes be approached as if it's art... or as if it's a dream one is trying to decipher. You're really just trying to understand yourself, get to know yourself... that sort of thing.
  • What will Mueller discover?
    The US is $19 trillion in debt. No Marshall Plan for us. :(
  • What will Mueller discover?
    There's no percentage in running the show. Crack a history book in your spare time. :)
  • What will Mueller discover?
    Now however it begins to look as if the USA has seriously abdicated. China and the EU under Merkel may be deciding they can steer the ship. Can there really be 3 1/2 years of US political paralysis ahead of us? Or isolationism which even the old poodle Great Britain can't say Woof to?mcdoodle
    Britain and France abdicated world leadership after WW2. Maybe it's just time for the US to retire into obscurity?
  • Art, Truth, Bulls, Fearlessness & Pissing Pugs
    He wrote about Mothra too. Deep stuff.
  • Art, Truth, Bulls, Fearlessness & Pissing Pugs
    Now that's impertinent. Wonder why they picked red stars?
  • Art, Truth, Bulls, Fearlessness & Pissing Pugs
    Just to be clear, it was the decision of whoever put the statue there that was impertinent -- or rude. Isn't that what the dispute in NYC is about? Was it rude or clever to add the girl statue to the platform on which the bull rested?Bitter Crank

    Look at the scenario where it was impertinent. What does that imply about the status of the bull? It makes him kind of shrine like.

    The bull is the fun half of a cycle. The other half is bearish. In capitalism, business cycles are allowed to swing with a pretty generous amplitude. Didn't Marx warn that this would eventually be the death of capitalism? That the bear which inevitably follows the bull would finally turn into Godzilla?
  • Art, Truth, Bulls, Fearlessness & Pissing Pugs
    Poseidon doesn't figure very large in the public imagination, these days.Bitter Crank

    Where is he? I'll find a heart breaking story to pin on him.
  • Art, Truth, Bulls, Fearlessness & Pissing Pugs
    I thought that placing the girl figure in front of the bull figure was impertinent. On its own, the girl figure has much less aesthetic and symbolic value than the bull figure. The girl figure was enhanced merely because of the juxtaposition, and the bull was devalued for the same reason.Bitter Crank

    Impertinent. I'm biting my tongue. Let's just say that in the time I've known you I've discovered your wealth of contradiction.

    The bull is an old symbol of a confident up-market. It isn't about male-female interaction or women's progress in Corporate America. (The opposite symbol of a bull market isn't a cow market, it's an equally powerful bear market.) If the artist wished to affirm that womanhood in the corporate suites is powerful, then the girl figure would have best been placed facing a doorway into a corporate palace--of which New York City has a few thousand.Bitter Crank

    I discard to gender issue surrounding it. It just doesn't mean much to me.
  • Art, Truth, Bulls, Fearlessness & Pissing Pugs
    If you notice, I gave my own interpretation of the scene without any regard to what the artists in question intended.

    If you and I were in China circa 1500AD, we would understand symbolism in art in a very rigid way. A certain arrangement of bird and bamboo means something specific. The deep coolness of this approach is that a garden can be read like a poem. That mound is near that body of water for a very specific reason. Those five pine trees mean something in particular. The poem changes with the seasons.

    That's not my world. Western artists are drawn to ambiguity. A muddy work boot becomes a work of art simply because we put it a glass case over it and put it in a museum. The cloud of memory and feeling I get lost in while staring at that boot is probably different from the cloud that you find. There is somebody who's terrorized by that boot. Another is overcome with grief. Me.. I'm standing in sunlight the year the 17 year cicadas came out and roared.

    A bull being stared down by a child on freakin' Wall St is begging for an outpouring of frustration and disappointment. I just insisted that it should reference that communal story as a preface to my take on it.

    What's yours?
  • Art, Truth, Bulls, Fearlessness & Pissing Pugs
    Why should public art "reflect the contemporary story"? I take that to mean: repeat platitudes.jamalrob

    The contemporary story is unique. It's who we are. You pick up the thread of a communal story by starting with your own experiences, right?
  • Art, Truth, Bulls, Fearlessness & Pissing Pugs
    It's public art, so it should reflect the contemporary story. Post 2008-2009, the Bull is a symbol of something dangerous not only to the US, but to the global economy. It's not American strength (in this art viewer's eyes), but the force behind a speculative bubble whose popping ends up hurting the people at the bottom. The girl represents the spirit of youngsters who want regulations to be put in place.

    What's the pug doing? I don't know.. I can't really fit that into the story. Put a blond wig on it.
  • What is the core of Corbyn's teaching? Compare & Contrast
    Obama won my state because of volunteers who drove lazy apathetic people to the polls. It requires a fair amount of effort and organization though... little to no philosophy is required.
  • Is to be agreeable to be straightforward? Why or why not?
    It's a matter of culture isn't it? New Englanders have a reputation for straight forwardness. In some areas of the Southeast , a larger portion of communication is nonverbal as straight forwardness can be perceived as rudeness.
  • In defence of weak naturalism
    Well, if you are asking about the idea of "supernaturality", then it has been from the beginning associated with divinity, since deities were pretty much defined as being immortal (i.e. beyond the realm of birth -- and death).Mariner

    It's true the Sumerians appear to have been preoccupied with immortality (Gilgamesh searches for it, Adapa is offered immortality, but doesn't realize it and turns it down.) The Gilgamesh epic specifically states that the difference between gods and humans is the matter of immortality. But one of the prime divinities of the Sumerian world was the moon god (father of the sun). It's believed that the dominance of this divinity may have to do with the use of the moon as a time piece, so we might understand it as a fusion of magic, religion, and science. I think if we could convey to an ancient Sumerian what we mean by natural, he would not see divinity as distinct from that concept.

    It is obvious once you think of it, there can't be language referring to the supernatural before there has been a distinction between the natural and the supernatural, and this distinction will always take the form of a retreat of the gods, since the original viewpoint of mankind was one in which deities interacted with non-deities constantly.Mariner

    Exactly. I think naturalists take care to define divinity as supernatural. I don't know who else narrows it down in that way.
  • The Anger Thread
    I think you should be able to link it with a tablet. What happens if you put your finger on the url for a couple of seconds?
  • In defence of weak naturalism
    When did people start thinking of divinity as supernatural?
  • Identity
    It is true, it seems, that the labels we put on things are not what that things "actually is".darthbarracuda

    Maleness is a property. What's your stance on Hume's Bundle Theory?