well it’s sort of like seeing a photo of a crying girl on the Time cover and believing she was torn from her mother. So I do understand how you like to read things.

Your contribution of falsely accusing someone of racism is of substance then?

Get it? Raping and crossing a border illegally are against the rules. Legal immigration and being a boyfriend is ok.

And, by the way, many races of people are legal immigrants. Am I against legal immigration? No.

You moron.

“Comparing illegal immigrants to rapists just marks you as a racist/xenophobic moron”

You did that. I compared a rapist with a boyfriend. It is how it is written.

confusing an immigrant with an illegal immigrant is like confusing a rapist with a boyfriend.

I would like to think she is not as viciously anti-immigrant as some others in the administration. — Baden

Ant-ILLEGAL-immigration. Funny how that slips by.

Did anyone see this photo? — René Descartes

She doesn't care about your criticism of her or her jacket.

Are there particular actions of Kanye that show irrationality?

Words he uses merely supports his way of selling and emphasizing his brand. It's the entertainment business. It appears to work for him so is possibly a rational business plan. Keeps his brand on the magazine covers.

Probably astute, more than anything.

Context: entertainment and publicity industry.

Does anyone consider Kanye West to be a man of reason? — Greta

So you are not prepared to select one thing to back your statement other than link to a gossip mag?

So eh? The little girl on the Time magazine cover was never separated from her mother.

Some creative people function excellently while tending to be largely irrational. Isn't that right MJ and Kanye? — Greta

I don't know who MJ is, but are you able to rationalize your mention of Kanye?

You have zero creditably with me — Jeremiah

I don't regard you as my measure.

Corporate media for Government Corp.

Why did Obama leave the practice of separating families in place? — wellwisher

Obama had the media on his side.

And it came after the Stormy Daniels fail.

Evidence of Russia-Trump collusion evidence has NOT been presented.

(CORRECTION)

And they also said when speaking to Congress that Russia sought to help Trump win. And the Senate Intelligence Committee have said the same. — Michael

No evidence of either has been presented.

The DNC server has not been inspected for it's evidence and then presented.

Evidence of Russia-Trump collusion evidence has been presented.

They have said there is not Russia-Trump collusion in Mueller's report.

Anything else said is politics. With regard to law, nothing.

So you trust it to be an absolute fact because the FBI have said so, even though you haven't personally seen the evidence? — Michael

Only under pressure of questions before congress did they admit this fact.

The FBI got the needed information from the 3rd party. A private company that the DNC decided to use — Jeremiah

You can't see any irony?

The "needed" information?

Yeah. They just needed anything to STOP them actually inspecting the server. The last thing the Comey lead FBI wanted to do was compromise their relationship with Clinton and put themselves in a position to lie about what was in the server.

If they don't see the server then it is less likely the FBI will be in trouble.

Comey took over HSBC bank, did he not, just when the bank got caught knowingly laundering terrorist's millions and Mexican drug cartel's millions?

HSBC was found guilty. So while under Comey The deal was made that HSBC was fined the equivalent of 5 weeks profit.

Millions of dead people as a consequence of help from HSBC Bank.

These are the types that run the FBI.

So stupid of me — Maw

Indeed.

It’s a hostile take-over of the GOP — Wayfarer

A hostile takeover? First thing, as Benkei said, dems and repubs are not particularly different. Well, history shows this in the cosy friendship Bill Clinon has with G W Bush along with their wars, Obama's wars included.

It has been a hostile resistance, on the whole, from the GOP.

In the coming days or weeks you will be embarrassed.

Quoting the criminal cartel of the day.

You are obviously unaware or are in denial that the FBI asked for access to the server. Crowdstrike, the private cyber security firm the DNC used, provided the only report. This report was not verified by government intelligence agencies through means of their own access to the server.

One having a reason for doing something doesn't necessarily make the something being done rational.

Obama's border policy - His Secretary of State's explanation in 2014.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dwTmN2wbJ0A

If I wake up one day and headlines about little kids being wrongfully taken from their families doesn't cause me outrage, then I also hope that is my last day on Earth. — Jeremiah

Same policy as Obama's. Here is Clinton in 2014 saying this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dwTmN2wbJ0A

The email hack was clearly to damage Clinton. — Jeremiah

No evidence has been presented that the DNC Podesta emails, etc, were hacked.

In fact the FBI were denied access to the DNC server by the DNC.

Now that sentence above is absolute fact and clarified by the FBI themselves.

It would appear the DNC had a disgruntled leaker. The presumption being disgruntlement at the treatment of the Bernie Sanders campaign

It is not so much about viewing the evidence as they just have much more creditably — Jeremiah

You're merely a believer. The evidence of this is clearly stated. You don't need to see the evidence. Please do not do jury duty. .

This shows you are quite prepared to believe some evidence, some say they have, exists without you seeing for yourself that it exists.

that apparently spans across 17 different civilian and government intelligence agencies AND Congress — Jeremiah

"The intelligence community and the Senate Intelligence Committee agree on that."

So I ask again.
Have you seen this evidence?

No you have not.

If some other way then it's possible to discourage people from coming without separating children. — Michael

I think it is quite simple to discourage this illegal border crossing. Send them all back with instructions to contact the American embassy in Mexico for further instructions on how to apply to immigrate.

There are consequences to everything in life. Whether or not I cross the road, good and bad things can happen. Sometimes life is about taking risks, especially when the prospects in avoiding the risk are di — Mr Phil O'Sophy

There are minimum legal rules about crossing the road, therefore lessor consequences than crossing the border illegally.

Does danger always imply something should be avoided? — Mr Phil O'Sophy

No. By all means, have a go and realize, maybe, some consequences.

You're right. Suicide is a corecion if nothing else; by circumstances and people(:sad: ) — TheMadFool

And in the final analysis we don't even no what "death" is. It is not something we have experienced and it is not something we will get a report on from a dead person.

Unless some gung-ho border patrol idiot decides to gun me down, — Akanthinos

Sounds dangerous to me.

You are simply believing these people. Just wait a while and it will likely become apparent what a scam this Russia thing is.

It is slowly but surely imploding.

There is no interest in what is true. The interest is in what can be sold as true.

Therefore they must be corrupt and this must all be a conspiracy against Trump? — Michael

It's an internal power struggle, Effectively a global internal power struggle.

Right, so we're back to your baseless assertion that this is all just some conspiracy by a corrupt FBI, DOJ, and Congress, all out to get Trump because they just don't like him? — Michael

These are politicians. This is government. Government is corporate.

This isn't heaven and these aren't angels.

So how is combining with others who feel the same and using whatever emotional means are at your disposal to influence those in power not one of the thing you can "possibly do"? You're saying it's reasonable for people to do everything in their power to retrieve what they believe is theirs, but then arbitrarily denying some of the methods by which they might do tha — Pseudonym

People can try anything. Good luck to them.