it's also why philosophy is dying out, — Seagully
ou made the claim and I should back it up for you...How old are you? — NOS4A2
For circular motion by the traveler, the two twins Do agree with one another. — Mike Fontenot
Tell us more about the parallels between Trump’s America and Nazi germany. — NOS4A2
Special relativity says that, for two perpetually-inertial observers (meaning that they have never accelerated, and never will accelerate), they EACH will conclude that the other is ageing more slowly. (I believe that all physicists believe that). — Mike Fontenot
Like I said, a moral panic. Trump is their folk devil. It is with scary stories and promises of a coming terror that they justify their authoritarianism and megalomania. — NOS4A2
That's false, there's nothing scientific about it at all. If it were scientific you could show me the process. — Metaphysician Undercover
I think you're confusing "scientific" with "scientism". — Metaphysician Undercover
speak in terms of fields — Metaphysician Undercover
To say that life came from dead matter is not scientific at all, — Metaphysician Undercover
One school of thought is that he says that she is ageing more slowly than he is, on both the outbound leg and on the inbound leg, — Mike Fontenot
Does the prospect of a unknown future refutation make the strongest argument weak — ZzzoneiroCosm
There are good arguments to say God must be benevolent — Devans99
But nobody sends anyone to hell in Buddhism, — Wayfarer
Without our language, we are not separated from God. — Athena
The whole animal kingdom has knowing without words (set of rules for interpreting). — Athena
there's always the same amount of knowledge to learn — Seagully
a dogmatic approach to knowledge- and certainty-pronouncements? — ZzzoneiroCosm
What lays in front of us, in the "future", always? The unknown.
Life has a will to discover and explore. Curiosity, questioning.
Although this may end up bringing the question, "is this will the prime mover?" — Seagully
"What can be said can and should always be said more and more simply and clearly"
~Karl Popper — Pantagruel
Every ocean is comprised of many droplets of water. — Seagully
It’s more like a limiting factor on a particular process. — Possibility
Might that be culturally different from a male god, the only god, making a man of mud and the woman from his rib? — Athena
Might things have been different if we didn't have the God of Abraham religions and only a male voice until the present? — Athena
↪ovdtogtI meant how does it know what result is desired before the process of trial and error begins? — Possibility
'It' stays 'fit' long enough to replicate.how does ‘natural selection’ know of this result? — Possibility
I think Aristotle was referring to [homo]'philia'.
— ovdtogt
What justification do you have for saying that? — mcdoodle
This has always struck me as an absurdum reductio argument for the impossibility of infinite past time. — Devans99
What do you think that ‘natural selection’ is? — Possibility
Life evolved out of chemical reactions. — Possibility
the fact that some people think that the universe went from no life to life simply indicates how little they know about the universe. — Metaphysician Undercover
I don't think anything ever comes from nothing. Isn't that a fundamental truth? — Metaphysician Undercover
Life didn't "come alive". That implies that there was a time when life was not alive, prior to coming alive, and that's contradictory. — Metaphysician Undercover
So the second absolute truth is that there cannot be only a single thing that exists in this reality now, there is at least a fundamental duality, there are at least two things that exist. — leo
It refutes your claim that life evolved out of dead matter. — Metaphysician Undercover
Something can exist since all eternity, — god must be atheist