Race, Religion, Ethnicity, and Nationality I'm going to ignore all the hostile responses. I rather spend my time on constructive discussions. (Sorry for your inconvenience.)
Personally speaking, they do hold us back because these categories are essentially divisive in character and the challenges the world faces today can't be solved without the exact opposite, unity. — TheMadFool
Ideally that is true, but there's always going to be some groups of people hating other groups of people.
During various times some of those categories are made hilariously important. Other times they are simply ignored as an oddity that isn't even used. — ssu
I agree. I would say "where you're from" categories are superficial and best used (if at all) as a social lubricant.
Are they important for us? As individuals often no, but our societies do use them and we will notice easily how powerful they can be.
Just live in a foreign country that goes into war with the country whose citizen you are and in an instant you have become to be very suspicious person. Have some other strife, riot, terrorist attack or a conflict which has to do with one of those four elements and you can notice it does effect your life even if your race, ethnicity, religion or nationality hasn't been ever important to you.
Of course, the best way to attack a stranger is to find its vulnerabilities. For example: the strongest most offensive way to attack me (not knowing anything about me) is to call me a "Jew".
Back on the topic of the OP, I think “ethnicity” is itself a complex topic, that other items on this list factor into. I like to think of ethnicity as decomposing into phenotypic ancestry (“race”), language, and religion. — Pfhorrest
I think it's more about the geographic regions your recent ancestors grew up in than an actual genotype.
Strictly speaking nationality is synonymous with ethnicity (a nation is a people, not a state), but I understand that you mean it to mean association with a state. Just bear in mind that there are some peoples who don’t have states that correspond to them, e.g. the Kurds.
I believe the Kurds are an ethnic group that inhabit different countries (similar to Jews and Gypsies).
It's my opinion that religion doesn't even belong on the document. Completely irrelevant. Race is a tricky one, because it is almost entirely social and it doesn't matter for any actual purpose unless you're doing some type of demographic study or poll on it. Ethnicity/nationality is usually more important and held to a higher degree of relevance to the individual, so in that sense I would think those to be more in line with "important" I suppose. — GTTRPNK
I would agree.
I wouldn't call them "essentially important" but they can be important when it comes to forming connections and relationships due to how someone else's answers compare to our own. Basically, when we don't know people we look for connections. We all have a cultural heritage and it can be fun to talk culture with people. It provides a safe, fun, informative ground for getting to know that person and their culture. — BitconnectCarlos
Very good point! Culture is very important. If I had to revise my OP, I would say that the four categories mentioned are only important because of culture.
Obviously, I'm not going to be like "oh you're from X, therefore you're like Y" but there is such a thing as cultural trends and if someone bucks a trend that's interesting in its own right. Learning another language is an excellent way to gain insight into another culture and help form a bridge. Personally, I regard my cultural background as important but in no way is it the entirety of me - only one aspect. — BitconnectCarlos
Same for me.
The reason it's not of "essential" importance is that we can (or at least should) be able to hit it off great with people from different backgrounds. I think values and worldview are more of "essential" importance. — BitconnectCarlos
I couldn't agree more.