I'll take your word for it.↪Wheatley If memory serves it's in the first few pages of the Open Society and its Enemies. — Olivier5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NiqqudFrom the little that I know, some ancient languages (Egyptian and the Semitic language family), the written words generally are missing vowels. — TheMadFool
That's actually Einstein. :roll:Clear, as defined by Popper himself, is equivalent to 'not using more complex a language than the problem at hand requires'. — Olivier5
What an absurd proposition. :eyes:Life is too short, and I tend to find SEP unreliable. — Olivier5
That's pretty much how it works here in America. Government representing special interest groups insurance companies and big business. Nevermind the people, we fend for ourselves.I like the businessman in political power, perhaps he'll do a good job. — Varde
I guess that explains the angry diatribe against US presidents in the OP. :gasp:we're emotional on a topic — Manuel
Your not the first person here to tell me what to read. :zip:No I mean, read the four words prior — Manuel
Okay, but i am saying that the EU is important for world peace. Sorry for butting into your conversation. :sad:That is emphatically not what I said. — Manuel
Would rather have a divided Europe, keeping in mind recent, twentieth century history with world war 1 and world war 2? A unified Europe is much better for world peace.I'm not saying EU is ALL bad. Not having to carry passports over borders, being able to move freely and having a common currency is comfortable and good. — Manuel
I see it makes more sense now. :smile:What about the pandemic, did the member states help each other out? — Manuel
Am I missing something? Isn't the UK part of the EU??EU functioned way better than the UK — Benkei
I found that information here. :chin:Flawed democracies in the EU:
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Estonia
France
Greece
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Malta
Portugal
Slovakia
Slovenia — Benkei
Oh c'mon. :grin: I could just as well be playing devils advocate. :smirk:You are much, much, much too kind to and understanding of most philosophers. — T Clark
That's included because the general idea is that your debating opponent is deceiving you.Not necessarily dishonest, just easily misunderstood or unhelpfully veiled. — Tom Storm
True, but I have the feeling that there are more variables.there is still the matter of writing which is lucid versus writing which is convoluted. — Tom Storm
Petition for an amendment! Reason: too many gullible people! Now, how's that for a proposition? :nerd:The constitution should be updated though. It's not as if it were God's word or something. — Manuel
Yea, good luck passing that. I believe it's also unconstitutional. Was it the 1st amendment?I think there should be a law that says that opinion or preference can't be given as fact. — Manuel
Correct. The Iraq war had really good ratings on cable news. To quote George Carlin, "We love war!"Not that NATO is much better. I mean yes, the US is somewhat democratic, more than the EU now, I'd argue, but it doesn't matter, I mean they can just bombard you with propaganda and people go wild and want to go to war. — Manuel
Nevermind the fascist point. I had something else in mind. :yikes:I don't what you are talking about with the fascist question. — Manuel
French president Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel have both expressed their support for a joint European army.Sanction the US or get out of NATO? They rely on NATO for defense. — Manuel
Yeah, i don't really care about the EU.So I think it is about the EU — Apollodorus
Why even bring China into this? Chinese expansionism is a separate issue. The OP is about Trump America.Which option should the EU go for? A divided world dominated by fascist China or a united world keeping Chinese expansionism under control? — Apollodorus
But is president Xi a threat to the EU? If so, who's a bigger threat to the European Union? The United States (under fascist Trump) or China?Trump is less fascist than Xi. — Apollodorus
Point taken. We will call trump a non-hawkish fascist!Yeah, but they were a bit hawkish — Hanover
If that be the case i think it's inaccurate to call him a fascist in the same sense that Hitler and Mussolini were fascist.Trump, despite his many many many flaws is dovish — Hanover
Perhaps with a threat of economic sanctions because Americans care passionately about their economy. It's better than tempting another world war (supposing there is an up-rise of right wing nationalism).How should other countries react to the fascist douche being elected? — Benkei
Yeah, I see that too. And then there are some discussions that are so dysfunctional, you have people yelling at each other with constant accusation of misrepresentation and misunderstanding and dishonesty. It makes me wonder how are these people are communicating at all. Amazing.A minority of members, who are less prideful or more willing to take risks, take a messier approach. They change their mind mid-discussion and fire out half-formed ideas. That can be good, but not always. — jamalrob
It also depends on what you are trying to do with your philosophy. Messiness can get in the way of clear communication, which is bad. But some ideas are crude and need time to develop, I guess you can call developing your ideas as a "messy process".know what you mean, but I think it's unavoidable in philosophy. The ideas are what's important, not the style, although that in itself is probably debated within philosophy. — jamalrob
I was wondering if there could be creative philosophy, but that's just speculation. But no, not really. I was just commenting on my own style of writing.Maybe you're describing something that's more often used in creative writing. Can you write philosophy in the style of Ulysses? — jamalrob