I get the question. So it's about power then, think, at the time of nothing, there is nothing, but also no time.

It's a question of what was there, not what is.

Evil is anti, not opposite to good, so not to be thought of as equal, rather, 'anti' or parasitical. Evil actions are definite, there're aren't many meanings (@tim wood).

The universe, when sensed, produces data that is in accord with mind, more than it is with any ledged doctrine about the universe.

The process of producing fecal matter, shows that a cycle completes, which, in accord with mind and not doctrine, shows that morality exists.

If a human eats, a cycle occurs, and feces is produced.

Evil is not ultimately wrong, but it is anti good or good parasitical, in the same way the start of a cycle is opposite to the end.

Oh, ok, my mistake.

Isn't life consistent whereas a dream is inconsistent? I haven't woke up, realised it was false and went back to dreaming.

Therefore, it is a true awakening.

I have the memory of so many days here, in this awakened state.

My argument is that because life is consistent, it can be understood by a measure of this consistency, as real; oppose to a dream which is understood shortly after as unreal.

Dreams can be known too, but when discussing the validity of life, per se - where did your dreamer body come from?