Comments

  • What exactly are phenomena?
    This is what reality is - it's not simply 'out there' waiting for us to take it in, our taking it in is a constructive process.Wayfarer
    :up:
  • Descartes Hyperjumping To Conclusions
    In my theory, consciousness = self organization. That everything that can happen dose happen, given enough time, is due entirely to self organization.Pop
    If you change the definition of words, it's going to be hard to communicate... It takes a lot of time and chance to get to true consciousness. It doesn't come with just a few Lego bricks... For me, the early universe was not conscious in any way, and consciousness emerged progressively from it, through life.
  • Nothing to do with Dennett's "Quining Qualia"
    there is no such thing as a property of language-less conscious experience that we've called "redness"creativesoul
    It is perfectly possible to experience the redness of an object, and to call it thus... I don't see what your problem is.
  • How does a naive realist theory of colour explain darkness?
    Then you have no argument with me.unenlightened
    No argument from me, just curious about your kind. I've met zombies before, as well as automaton wannabees, but it's the first time I meet with an out-of-minder.
  • How does a naive realist theory of colour explain darkness?
    How do you know? Have you seen it?unenlightened

    Of course.
  • How does a naive realist theory of colour explain darkness?
    I literally live in the world.unenlightened

    The world is a vast place. You could be a little more specific. I bet you live quite close to a certain human body of flesh, bones and nerves, that you can somehow control, and that people call "you".
  • Nothing to do with Dennett's "Quining Qualia"
    The Redness of Red, by Emily Downe
  • Deep Songs
    Did you ever wake up to find
    A day that broke up your mind
    Destroyed your notion of circular time
    It's just that demon life has got you in its sway

    Ain't flinging tears out on the dusty ground
    For all my friends out on the burial ground
    Can't stand the feeling getting so brought down
    It's just that demon life has got me in its sway

    There must be ways to find out
    Love is the way they say is really strutting out
    Hey, hey, hey now
    One day I woke up to find
    Right in the bed next to mine
    Someone that broke me up with a corner of her smile, yeah
    It's just that demon life has got me in its sway

  • How does a naive realist theory of colour explain darkness?
    Those of us who do not live in the mindunenlightened

    You guys live literally "out of your mind"?
  • How does a naive realist theory of colour explain darkness?
    "my seeing" nooooht a mental imagebongo fury
    Spooky, huh?
  • How does a naive realist theory of colour explain darkness?
    I see the apple as distinct from my seeing already. Sometimes, when I peep round the back of what seemed to be a red apple, it turns out to be green on the other side. I still see it out there, not in my head.unenlightened
    Okay so you conceive of your "seeing of an apple" as different from the real apple. That's all there is to it. That's what the debate is about.

    When people say it is "in your head" they don't mean it literally. They mean it's in your mind.

    Like when they propose a cup of tea? I've learnt by experience that you're not supposed to keep or eat that cup.
  • How does a naive realist theory of colour explain darkness?
    Alas for the indirect realist, whenever there is a demonstrable difference between the objective and the subjective, it demonstrates that there is an objective, that we can be deceived about.unenlightened

    Alas for the naïve realist, it also demonstrates that there is a subjective perception as well, that perception is distinct from its objects.
  • How does a naive realist theory of colour explain darkness?
    if we consistently and independently agree about which apples are red and which are green (which we do), then either the apples are different or our brains are in direct communication by telepathyunenlightened
    People have disagreed about apple colours before. When they do, are they seeing a different apple?

    Beside, there are also optical illusions about colour, whereby a similar objective hue is subjectively seen as two or more different colours. In this case, there is a demonstrable difference between the objective and the subjective.
  • How does a naive realist theory of colour explain darkness?
    It's called colour vision, and it's no great mystery to me.unenlightened
    And yet it is a great mystery to others. For example, how come wave lengths get coded in colours? Where does that happen?
  • Nothing to do with Dennett's "Quining Qualia"
    It relates to philosophical issues such as dualism, qualia, the hard problem, and what not.Andrew M

    It may relate to these issues but it does not impact on them. E.g. you can think apples are red and still be a dualist.

    this just comes down to whether one accepts the philosophical subject/object distinction or not. As I've mentioned before, I reject it.Andrew M
    You cannot actually reject anything if you are not a subject.
  • Nothing to do with Dennett's "Quining Qualia"
    Not sure where you get "basic" and "fundamental" from. Not from Dennett's paper.Luke
    Good point. People keep loading the concept with extraneous baggage.

    By the way, Dennett's pumps illustrate that qualia are objective to a degree, and therefore can be studied by science. Hence all the neuroscientists he summons, who are connecting qualia, changing them, inverting them, etc. in his 'intuition pumps'. He could not imagine any of that if deep down (unconsciously), he did not see qualia as objective phenomena.
  • Nothing to do with Dennett's "Quining Qualia"
    And it matters because qualia are supposed to be basic, fundamental, private, ineffable, immediately apprehensible, etc. but redness is none of those thingscreativesoul

    But red is, so it doesn't matter.
  • Nothing to do with Dennett's "Quining Qualia"
    Identifying the color as "red" does not require metacognition.
    — creativesoul

    Why not?
    Luke

    And why does it matter?
  • Descartes Hyperjumping To Conclusions
    to what extent can something exist independent of a viewer / interpreter?Pop

    I have no evidence that things disappear when I don't look at them. In fact, conservation of mass and energy requires that the existence of things does not depend on them being observed or not.

    brings into question the stupidity of the universe,Pop

    Not really. It's more that everything that can happen does happen, given enough time.

    I think, we have to start, as Descartes did, with; I think, therefore I am, and so the word is, and so on.Pop

    Yes, that's where everybody starts.
  • Nothing to do with Dennett's "Quining Qualia"
    apples don't look red in the dark, yet they are redAndrew M
    Okay, whatever. It makes no philosophical difference that I can see to my perception of red.
  • Nothing to do with Dennett's "Quining Qualia"
    There are no minds, sensations, feelings as they are commonly theorised or intuited..bongo fury

    So you are going to tell all about how minds, sensations, feelings are uncommonly but properly theorised or intuited? 'Cause the other guys ain't telling... :-)
  • Descartes Hyperjumping To Conclusions
    one cannot decide to hear something or not, but can decide to think about something.Heiko

    Yes, one can direct one's thoughts to a degree, or at least it feels this way, and this is a big reason why we identify with 'our' thoughts. We have some control over them, while we have no control over quite a few other things 'out there', things which, as a result, we don't identify with.
  • Nothing to do with Dennett's "Quining Qualia"
    Folk suppose that if they can't sensibly talk about qualia then the eliminative materialists have won.Banno
    LOL. Talk for yourself, Banno. You can of course contend that you personally cannot make sense of the concept. But don't deny other people's use of it. I for one will use the word whether you can understand it or not. I'm not going to ask you for permission...

    As for eliminative materialism, isn't that the theory that no true theory can possibly exist? It eliminates itself....
  • Descartes Hyperjumping To Conclusions
    Descartes' main problem, for some, appears to be his nationality.
  • Descartes Hyperjumping To Conclusions
    the world is our interpretation of this information, rather than an accurate integration of the facts of the world as they might exist.Pop

    I think we all know instinctively that the world can disagree with us, that it can very well contradict our interpretations of it. The facts of the world impose themselves on us.
  • Nothing to do with Dennett's "Quining Qualia"
    , "All cats look grey in the dark". No disagreement from me.

    However that use is derivative from situations where we observe an object in normal lighting which is where color distinctions are originally made. That's the reference point in the world.
    Andrew M
    For colors, the looking and the being are dentical. An apple that receives no light cannot absorb part of the visible spectrum and reflect the other. It has the pigments to do so but not the light that would be playing with the pigments.

    There's more: in the absence of light, maturing apples will become pallish, not red. So apples need to sense some light in order to even bother producing pigments to color that light. The same apply to leaves: if kept in the dark for a while, they will lose their green chlorophyll and turn white.
  • Descartes Hyperjumping To Conclusions
    One cannot exist without the other - chicken and egg situation.Pop

    I've seen no evidence that the world cannot exist without consciousness in it. In fact, it must have started as a totally stupid universe.
  • Descartes Hyperjumping To Conclusions
    I think we exist as consciousness, and the world is a product of this,Pop

    Consciousness by definition is always the consciousness of something (the world). So the world does not spring of consciousness, it is a logical requirement for any consciousness.
  • How does a naive realist theory of colour explain darkness?
    Mummy always insisted on taking more important things, like clothes, to a window before she bought them, to check how they looked in daylight, shop lighting being somewhat deceptive.unenlightened

    :up:
  • Descartes Hyperjumping To Conclusions
    It lands on, I am consciousness, and from there it can not go any further.Pop

    It can go to: therefore I exist, and therefore the world exists.
  • Nothing to do with Dennett's "Quining Qualia"
    Talk of "redness" is existentially dependent upon language use. Reflecting the frequencies we've named "red" does not.creativesoul

    Certainly, talk of "frequencies" depends upon language use, just as talk of "redness" does, or talk of anything else... and ' we've named "red" ' depends explicitly upon language use.
  • Nothing to do with Dennett's "Quining Qualia"
    That the apple isn't being looked at, or appears differently in the dark, doesn't change that physical aspect.Andrew M

    All cats are grey in the dark.
  • Nothing to do with Dennett's "Quining Qualia"
    Rouge is a serious business where I come from.

    YSL-SLIM-HAND.jpg
  • Nothing to do with Dennett's "Quining Qualia"
    just a few that stand out enough to be namedMarchesk
    There are more in French:

    ob_253e1f_rouge-nuances.jpg
  • Nothing to do with Dennett's "Quining Qualia"
    You can do better, Oliver. You have some understanding of Wittgenstein. You have a better grasp of the argument than you pretend here.Banno
    You too can do better than your silly attempts at undermining perfectly fine concepts. You cannot destroy any concept anyway, least of all the concept of "meaning". Your attempts are futile.
  • Nothing to do with Dennett's "Quining Qualia"
    And what do your meaningless posts do, pray tell?
  • Nothing to do with Dennett's "Quining Qualia"
    Unless, of course, you want to argue that meaning and use are the same thing.Banno
    Why do you write posts if those posts mean nothing at all?
  • Nothing to do with Dennett's "Quining Qualia"
    Corcoran and his colleagues pitted a particularly noisy species of tiger moth, the Bertholdia trigona, against big brown bats trained to hunt in a flight room. As long as the moths were able to click, the bats couldn't catch them, even though the moths were tethered on a string.Olivier5

    We're talking ultrasounds here, but similar "clicks" emitted by the infamous death's head hawk moth are audible to humans:

  • The Road to 2020 - American Elections
    This is a great example of how emotions cloud your judgment, and the power propaganda has on weak minds.Harry Hindu

    I suppose Timothy Mcveigh was a weak mind, then. Or perhaps his victims?