:up:This is what reality is - it's not simply 'out there' waiting for us to take it in, our taking it in is a constructive process. — Wayfarer
If you change the definition of words, it's going to be hard to communicate... It takes a lot of time and chance to get to true consciousness. It doesn't come with just a few Lego bricks... For me, the early universe was not conscious in any way, and consciousness emerged progressively from it, through life.In my theory, consciousness = self organization. That everything that can happen dose happen, given enough time, is due entirely to self organization. — Pop
It is perfectly possible to experience the redness of an object, and to call it thus... I don't see what your problem is.there is no such thing as a property of language-less conscious experience that we've called "redness" — creativesoul
No argument from me, just curious about your kind. I've met zombies before, as well as automaton wannabees, but it's the first time I meet with an out-of-minder.Then you have no argument with me. — unenlightened
How do you know? Have you seen it? — unenlightened
I literally live in the world. — unenlightened
Those of us who do not live in the mind — unenlightened
Spooky, huh?"my seeing" nooooht a mental image — bongo fury
Okay so you conceive of your "seeing of an apple" as different from the real apple. That's all there is to it. That's what the debate is about.I see the apple as distinct from my seeing already. Sometimes, when I peep round the back of what seemed to be a red apple, it turns out to be green on the other side. I still see it out there, not in my head. — unenlightened
Alas for the indirect realist, whenever there is a demonstrable difference between the objective and the subjective, it demonstrates that there is an objective, that we can be deceived about. — unenlightened
People have disagreed about apple colours before. When they do, are they seeing a different apple?if we consistently and independently agree about which apples are red and which are green (which we do), then either the apples are different or our brains are in direct communication by telepathy — unenlightened
And yet it is a great mystery to others. For example, how come wave lengths get coded in colours? Where does that happen?It's called colour vision, and it's no great mystery to me. — unenlightened
It relates to philosophical issues such as dualism, qualia, the hard problem, and what not. — Andrew M
You cannot actually reject anything if you are not a subject.this just comes down to whether one accepts the philosophical subject/object distinction or not. As I've mentioned before, I reject it. — Andrew M
Good point. People keep loading the concept with extraneous baggage.Not sure where you get "basic" and "fundamental" from. Not from Dennett's paper. — Luke
And it matters because qualia are supposed to be basic, fundamental, private, ineffable, immediately apprehensible, etc. but redness is none of those things — creativesoul
Identifying the color as "red" does not require metacognition.
— creativesoul
Why not? — Luke
to what extent can something exist independent of a viewer / interpreter? — Pop
brings into question the stupidity of the universe, — Pop
I think, we have to start, as Descartes did, with; I think, therefore I am, and so the word is, and so on. — Pop
Okay, whatever. It makes no philosophical difference that I can see to my perception of red.apples don't look red in the dark, yet they are red — Andrew M
There are no minds, sensations, feelings as they are commonly theorised or intuited.. — bongo fury
one cannot decide to hear something or not, but can decide to think about something. — Heiko
LOL. Talk for yourself, Banno. You can of course contend that you personally cannot make sense of the concept. But don't deny other people's use of it. I for one will use the word whether you can understand it or not. I'm not going to ask you for permission...Folk suppose that if they can't sensibly talk about qualia then the eliminative materialists have won. — Banno
the world is our interpretation of this information, rather than an accurate integration of the facts of the world as they might exist. — Pop
For colors, the looking and the being are dentical. An apple that receives no light cannot absorb part of the visible spectrum and reflect the other. It has the pigments to do so but not the light that would be playing with the pigments., "All cats look grey in the dark". No disagreement from me.
However that use is derivative from situations where we observe an object in normal lighting which is where color distinctions are originally made. That's the reference point in the world. — Andrew M
One cannot exist without the other - chicken and egg situation. — Pop
I think we exist as consciousness, and the world is a product of this, — Pop
Mummy always insisted on taking more important things, like clothes, to a window before she bought them, to check how they looked in daylight, shop lighting being somewhat deceptive. — unenlightened
It lands on, I am consciousness, and from there it can not go any further. — Pop
Talk of "redness" is existentially dependent upon language use. Reflecting the frequencies we've named "red" does not. — creativesoul
That the apple isn't being looked at, or appears differently in the dark, doesn't change that physical aspect. — Andrew M
You too can do better than your silly attempts at undermining perfectly fine concepts. You cannot destroy any concept anyway, least of all the concept of "meaning". Your attempts are futile.You can do better, Oliver. You have some understanding of Wittgenstein. You have a better grasp of the argument than you pretend here. — Banno
Why do you write posts if those posts mean nothing at all?Unless, of course, you want to argue that meaning and use are the same thing. — Banno
Corcoran and his colleagues pitted a particularly noisy species of tiger moth, the Bertholdia trigona, against big brown bats trained to hunt in a flight room. As long as the moths were able to click, the bats couldn't catch them, even though the moths were tethered on a string. — Olivier5
This is a great example of how emotions cloud your judgment, and the power propaganda has on weak minds. — Harry Hindu
