About Shawn
| About | There unrecognized beauty within. Gaze into the abyss. |
| Location | The doc is in. |
| Website | www.youtube.com/watch?v=iX-sSkXbEDY |
| Posts | 13,306 |
| Joined | |
| Last Active | |
| Site Role | Member, Guest Speaker Questioner |
| Favourite philosophers | Plato, Stoics, Schopenhauer, Wittgenstein, Kripke, Harry Frankführer |
| Favourite quotations |
If the methodology cannot be entertained as true, then the outcome must be ascertained as the proof of the methodology. If the methodology is determined by the outcome of the truth of the issue, then those more concerned with truth itself are going to, at least, have the moral superior outcome. -Myself, and seemingly no methodology satisfied the premise. **** Important point: Gödel's incompleteness theorem applies to formal languages with countable alphabets. So it does not rule out the possibility that one might be able to prove 'everything' in a formal system with an uncountable alphabet OR expand the alphabet to account for new variables. **** Currently studying the hippocampus, quantum mechanics (probability theory), measurement problem (level of determinism and degrees of freedom in the world), and, well, quite frankly, 'dreams'. Did research of wave-functions of interactions between photons with natural elements (Rabi cycle combined with Rabi frequency). The light shall guide you. Imagine diffusion of electrons from a electromagnetic field, yeah literally a neodymium magnetic field with current circling around the magnet. Did research at IBM as a researcher and investor on length of alphabets needed to solve P V NP. From there we computed complexity classes. Everyone said this was the most fun they ever had. Model theory has never been so advanced at IBM. |
Shawn
Start FollowingSend a Message
- Other sites we like
- Social media
- Terms of Service
- Sign In
- Created with PlushForums
- © 2025 The Philosophy Forum