If someone edits in a tag or reply it doesn't result in a notification for some reason. If the tag is there in the original post it does. As far as I know.

Lol. The New York Times leans left? What a joke. In the US they don't seem to know what "left" really is. Compared to the Netherlands, Republicans would be far right of any of our main parties. The democrats world be right of centre. Bernies' ideas are centrist here and generally embraced by must right wing parties as well (those aspects to do with the welfare state) — Benkei

You can add Ireland and most of Western Europe to that.

only on the gap of today filling itself
as emptiness is distributed
in the idea of what time it is
when that time is already past — csalisbury

That broke my brain. In a good way though.

The Dem establishment (here through Carville) is panicking about Sanders exactly the way the Repub establishment panicked about Trump. But Trump won... On the other hand, they may be more successful in eating themselves alive and if so, they'll have the likes of Carville and others like him to blame.

Can't see any reason to keep this open.

Yes.

Trump is triggered, hateful, and hysterical every single day and you love it so much you've made the interior of his colon your permanent home. So, it's a puzzle why you would criticize Pelosi. Though actually not since your criticism is just more of the same partisan garbage you've been filling this thread with since you got here. (And I don't even like Pelosi btw).

She probably should have shoved it up his ass. Although she would have needed to remove an army of sycophants to make space for it. :lol:

Your cartoons are very cool. :up:

It starting to look like the conspiracy theory is the idea that the DNC would not do anything short of planting a bomb on Bernie's bus to stop the guy winning.

Anyway, whatever. It all gets old quickly. 'Night.

Lol.



No, the DNC is holding them back to further screw Bernie when necessary.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/31/dnc-superdelegates-110083

Do they ever? Call it a mini electoral college. You can win the popular vote and lose the election.

The reason is Sanders is ahead in the popular vote and Buttigieg in delegates.

Let's not buy into conspiracy theories without a lot of evidence to support such claims. — Xtrix

Nobody said the conspiracy theory was true. I made a point about what it looked like. Which is what matters.

The final poll means the poll the night before the caucus that disappeared. He was ahead in the average of other polls.

Dems spend months chasing Trump for corruptly influencing elections and then suddenly when Bernie is about to take Iowa the final poll disappears and then the results disappear and they end up looking twice as corrupt as the Don. Good work :ok:

@Invisibilis Oh, here's an OP where someone made an effort. https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/6920/because-qualia-this-what-does-it-mean. Maybe try something like that. Drive by "I just had a thought... " type stuff is what we're trying to militate against here.

:chin: :up:

Read the caveats.

Why should that be a problem?

For example?

He has been criminal on occasions, but shouldn't the people he's working good for, pardon him? — Qwex

Yes, agreed. I can't think of any reason why a country wouldn't want a criminal for President, especially when he's working so good for the rich Republican senators that can pardon him.

Don and John.

This discussion was merged into What is art?

@Noble Dust

Don't feed the troll.

Bugger off with the BS.

Reason with a capital 'R' that is. She's a person. — Bartricks

Oh, I see. You're taking the proverbial. Have fun with that.

Badly phrased. Concepts can't adopt attitudinal stances. You might say bad art is not in accord with reason. But that would be to misunderstand how art functions, which is to be just that creative product which is not a priori bound by any expressible criteria. Bad art lacks quality. And quality is contextual and the root of reason rather than its product.

I have always just presumed so... :chin:

:naughty:

@Wallows Probably your best OP.

You win anyway. You have the jiviest words today. I have but emojis.

Yes, exactly.

Nah, I agree with him. He doesn't exist. Probably a bot.

On the other hand, he's probably the only one of us making any money. :cry:

As if your imaginary friend is going to answer.

:clap:

Christianity Today recently saw the light in their Op-Ed where they apparently no longer have 'unanimous' support for the dumper Trumper. LOL ) — 3017amen

"But the facts in this instance are unambiguous: The president of the United States attempted to use his political power to coerce a foreign leader to harass and discredit one of the president’s political opponents. That is not only a violation of the Constitution; more importantly, it is profoundly immoral.

The reason many are not shocked about this is that this president has dumbed down the idea of morality in his administration. He has hired and fired a number of people who are now convicted criminals. He himself has admitted to immoral actions in business and his relationship with women, about which he remains proud. His Twitter feed alone—with its habitual string of mischaracterizations, lies, and slanders—is a near perfect example of a human being who is morally lost and confused."

https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2019/december-web-only/trump-should-be-removed-from-office.html

Stating the obvious, but good for them.