You might have heard of the term “natural selection”. — apokrisis
The actuality of substantial being arises out of formal constraint on material uncertainty. — apokrisis
Surely if a being is omnipresent, then it must be both inside and outside of the perceiver, and the perceiver should be able to feel what is inside the perceiver, if unable to see the omnipresent hidden inside the perceiver, and surely what is outside of the perceiver must be seen and perceived? — Corvus
Now that I think of it, what about the earth, the moon, and the sun itself viewed as one giant timepiece? — TheMadFool
because the letters complex also contains the letter 'Λ' — Alkis Piskas
Perhaps I should give an analogy: — Derrick Huestis
Don't waste your time... — TheMadFool
Can a God who encompasses all time be timeless? Or encompass all change and be changeless? — Derrick Huestis
That you think you are is not the same as you are. — TheMadFool
Of one thing we can be certain - minds. We can't disprove that there are no minds for to attempt to do so requires a mind, kinda like shooting oneself in the foot. — TheMadFool
We're on the same page. Nothing to discuss. — TheMadFool
Sorry, I didn't catch your drift. Can you expand and elaborate. Thanks. — TheMadFool
You mean to say that the word "computer" existed in Babylonian/Egyptian times? I don't think so. — TheMadFool
The meaning is the use. — Banno
contradicting yourself — TheMadFool
Incorrect — Noble Dust
Who?.. — Noble Dust
Nice Tintin avatar, btw. And I can't help but ask... "Arcturus" wouldn't be a reference to "A Voyage To Arcturus" by David Lindsay, right?
2mReply — Noble Dust
The omniabsent God"! Even if taken as a joke, it says really a lot, doesn't it? — Alkis Piskas
people have a word like computer back in the old days — TheMadFool