• Do you feel more enriched being a cantankerous argumentative ahole?
    Fallin' down from where?Agustino

    A high horse, I'd imagine.
  • Stuff you'd like to say but don't since this is a philosophy forum
    Does 'refer' refer to anything? Is 'useful' useful? Does 'does' do anything?

    Definition of 'science' : magic that works.
  • Do you feel more enriched being a cantankerous argumentative ahole?
    While one who sings with his tongue on fire
    Gargles in the rat race choir
    Bent out of shape from society’s pliers
    Cares not to come up any higher
    But rather get you down in the hole
    That he’s in

    But I mean no harm nor put fault
    On anyone that lives in a vault
    But it’s alright, Ma, if I can’t please him.

    The Gospel of Bob, ch4, v3.
  • Yin Yang
    I take it that, in a very basic sense, the white represents the good and the black represents evil.TheMadFool

    No, it doesn't. It's more like the 0 and 1 of computing. Evil is if anything represented by trying to compute with only ones and no zeros, but it is really a foreign concept to Chinese tradition
  • Philosophy of depression.
    verb (used with object), owed, owing.
    1.
    to be under obligation to pay or repay:
    to owe money to the bank; to owe the bank interest on a mortgage.
    2.
    to be in debt to:
    He says he doesn't owe anybody.
    3.
    to be indebted (to) as the cause or source of:
    to owe one's fame to good fortune.
    4.
    to have or bear (a feeling or attitude) toward someone or something:
    to owe gratitude to one's rescuers

    Take a look at 3. (from dictionary .com)
    To take their example, one might owe one's fame to good fortune, but one does not have either the obligation or the means to repay it. In the case of life, which one owes in the same way to the world, the world will reclaim its gift in due course, one is not obliged to hasten to repay.

    When you have nothing valuable to say, please don't.Noblosh

    I had something valuable, but you did not take advantage. Instead, you thought you could argue from the meaning of words, to the nature of the world. This is known in the trade as 'magical thinking'.
  • Philosophy of depression.
    Owing implies an obligation to reciprocateNoblosh

    Owing to the categorical stupidity of this declaration, I will not be attempting to engage with it.
  • Philosophy of depression.
    On the contrary, determining our relation(s) with the world is at the core of assessing depression.Noblosh

    Seems pretty uncontroversial to me to say that we owe our lives to the blind watchmaker, or Nature, or God, or chance, or history, or whatever as long as we don't claim to have earned it already. And given that our lives will be taken from us at some point, it does not seem that the ecological and moral economy allows us to earn more than our keep from the world, at best. Accumulating worth like profit seems out of the question.
  • What is the core of Corbyn's teaching? Compare & Contrast
    I'll put it somewhat differently. Those who don't vote will tend to be middle of the road politically; extremists always vote. Therefore, voter apathy tends to lead to extremism and instability.
  • What is the core of Corbyn's teaching? Compare & Contrast
    Ah, but I'm below average, so in deciding not to vote, I've made it better.Michael

    I'm not convinced. :(
  • What is the core of Corbyn's teaching? Compare & Contrast
    the majority can only be average.Agustino

    No, the whole point is that the majority will be average only if everyone votes, but if the best of us decide it is futile and don't vote, then it will be below average.
  • What is the core of Corbyn's teaching? Compare & Contrast
    If rational intelligent informed people convince themselves that voting is futile, then elections will be decided by the stupid, the ignorant and the irrational.

    Perhaps it's already happened.
  • What is the core of Corbyn's teaching? Compare & Contrast
    So, guys, I'm totally going to vote – for the Labour party as a tactical vote. Go ahead and do the same as well! Unless the Lib Dems have a shot, in which case vote for them!Michael

    I'm convinced. :D
  • What is the core of Corbyn's teaching? Compare & Contrast
    My vote would only be relevant if the Conservatives end up winning by 1 vote.Michael

    Your vote would only be decisive if the Conservatives ended up winning by 1 vote. And even then it would be no more decisive than any of the thousands of other votes cast. Except that even then it wouldn't unless you actually voted on the off-chance. But I argued above that non-decisive votes are also influential, and that the influence is small is true of every vote cast, but not true of yours if you don't cast it. But your rationalisation of apathy and despair is tragically influential in demotivating others from doing their minuscule bit to make the world better by reusing and recycling and voting and contributing to charity and so on.
  • What is the core of Corbyn's teaching? Compare & Contrast
    The Greens are more inline with the rule, I can see no evidence of the three main parties adopting green policies. Indeed the conservatives did try to court some green voters during the early years of the 21st century.Punshhh

    Well the tories would like to encourage the greens as a way of splitting the left-wing vote. It is when the greens start to steal tory votes that they will get on board. I suggest the slogan," Conservation is the real conservatism". ;)
  • What is the core of Corbyn's teaching? Compare & Contrast
    The trouble is a lot of us in the UK are in safe seats, so our votes are irrelevant to the result. My whole life I've been in safe Conservative seats, so all I can do is vote appropriate to my ideology and my vote will be counted in analysis of the popular vote, which is not likely to change anything.Punshhh

    I think this thesis is well disproved by the overwhelming influence of UKIP despite their abysmal showing in elections. Rather, it is the folks that always vote the same way and thus create safe seats that have no influence. Things change when people change, and Conservatives are hyper sensitive to who is slicing a few votes off their majorities, and who is dividing 'their' votes in the places they lose.

    Likewise, the more people vote green, the more the other parties will adopt green policies, even if the greens get no seats, because those are the votes they need to get next time.
  • Nietzsche - citation
    A devilish detail indeed! My bet is that he never said it, it just sounds like something he might have said.
  • How do you define Free Will?
    Surely there are several kinds of freedom. There is political freedom; there is the freedom which knowledge gives when you know how to do things, the know-how; the freedom of a wealthy man who can go round the world; the freedom of capacity, to be able to write, to express oneself, to think clearly. Then there is the freedom from something: freedom from oppression, freedom from envy, freedom from tradition, from ambition, and so on. And then there is the freedom which is gained, we hope, at the end - at the end of the discipline, at the end of acquiring virtue, at the end of effort - the ultimate freedom we hope to get through doing certain things. So, the freedom that capacity gives, the freedom from something and the freedom we are supposed to gain at the end of a virtuous life - those are types of freedom we all know. Now are not those various freedoms merely reactions? When you say, ''I want to be free from anger,'' that is merely a reaction; it is not freedom from anger. And the freedom which you think that you will get at the end of a virtuous life by struggle, by discipline - that is also a reaction to what has been. Please, sirs, follow this carefully because I am going to say something somewhat difficult in the sense that you are not accustomed to it. There is a sense of freedom which is not from anything, which has no cause, but which is a state of being free. You see, the freedom that we know is always brought about by will, is it not? I will be free, I will learn a technique, I will become a specialist, I will study, and that will give me freedom. So we use will as a means of achieving freedom, do we not? I do not want to be poor and therefore I exercise my capacity, my will, everything to get rich. Or, I am vain and I exercise will not to be vain. So we think we shall get freedom through the exercise of will. But will does not bring freedom, on the contrary, as I will show you.

    What is will? I will be, I must be, I must not be, I am going to struggle to become something, I am going to learn - all these are forms of exercising will. Now what is this will and how is it formed? Obviously, through desire. Our many desires, with their frustrations, compulsions, and fulfillments form, as it were, the threads of a cord, a rope. That is will, is it not? Your many contradictory desires together become a very strong and powerful rope with which you try to climb to success, to freedom. Now will desire give freedom, or is the very desire for freedom the denial of it? Please watch yourselves, sirs, watch your own desires, your own ambition, your own will. And if one has no will and is merely being driven, that also is a part of will - being driven is also part of that will, the will to resist and go with it - all that is part of will. Through that weight of desire, through that rope, we hope to climb to God, to bliss, or whatever it is.

    So I am asking you whether your will is a liberating factor. Is freedom come by through will? Or, is freedom something entirely different, which has nothing to do with reaction, which cannot be achieved through capacity, through thought, experience, discipline, or constant conformity? That is what all the books say, do they not? Conform to the pattern and you will be free in the end; do all these things, obey, and ultimately there will be freedom. To me all that is sheer nonsense because freedom is at the beginning, not at the end, as I will show you.
    — J. Krishnamurti
    http://www.jkrishnamurti.org/krishnamurti-teachings/view-text.php?tid=591&chid=4910&w=freedom
  • Are there ghosts in the ante-room?
    And the moral of that is, 'leave the metaphors to poets, Richard.'
  • Philosophy of depression.
    Wilful misunderstanding...


    The great man, the great man, historians his memory
    Artists his senses, thinkers his brain
    Labourers his growth
    Explorers his limbs
    And soldiers his death each second
    And mystics his rebirth each second
    Businessmen his nervous system
    No-hustle men his stomach
    Astrologers his balance
    Lovers his loins
    His skin it is all patchy
    But soon will reach one glowing hue
    God is his soul
    Infinity his goal
    The mystery his source
    And civilisation he leaves behind
    Opinions are his fingernails


    Maya Maya
    All this world is but a play
    Be thou the joyful player

    https://genius.com/The-incredible-string-band-maya-lyrics
  • Are there ghosts in the ante-room?
    This is just the ontology of possible worlds, isn't it? I think it makes sense to say that I could have had tea instead of coffee for breakfast, without having to posit an anteroom of ghostly beverages from which the lucky coffee was chosen and doomed to be drunk.

    But Dawkins is quite hot on misleading analogies that are not to be taken literally, but which he takes literally. The selfish gene for instance. He accepts from the outset that genes have no self, and no interests, and then proceeds to assume that they do.
  • Philosophy of depression.
    Again, someone may not love their partner but the suggestion to leave them would cause a number of other 'losses' that it far outweighs it, thus one forms a certain tolerance that they blindly conform and silence their own voice to maintain a relationship that they are really unhappy in.TimeLine

    Bin there, done that, got the scars. "I am not the sort of person that walks out when the relationship gets difficult." - is an attractive identity, that might look from the outside more like a doormat.

    To articulate the right language to speak and fight this monster takes time...TimeLine

    Well to change the situation in the world takes time, to say what needs to be said, or whatever, but my experience is that the change of mind is like flash of insight, or a burden dropped; it is instantaneous. "Actually, fuck it, I am the sort of person that walks out when the show is over." Years of misery can end with a simple insight.

    "Hey, guys, you don't have to be miserable isolated and numb any more, just fuck the whole thing." But of course when one is in that world, that relationship, saying that seems both false and insulting.

    Edit: And absolutely, get some sleep. There's plenty of interesting stuff out there and a ton of potions, diets, routines, etc. Try stuff out until you get a really good regular sleep the way you recharge the batteries for some energy.
  • Philosophy of depression.
    I would argue that depression is so hard to treat because we are in some sense the slave to our passions. How else would you explain the difficulty in treating depression?Question

    It's interesting that you put it like that. The 'we' that is a slave to passions is 'reason'. So it looks as though you are identifying as 'the reasoner' and against 'the passionate'. This is quite close to the dissociation I mentioned in reply to @0 thru 9. The reasoner is the disembodied inner thought, and the passionate is the connected body. The 'feeling' of depression, then, is almost a pseudo-feeling -or a feeling of numbness due to disconnection from passion.

    The difficulty of treatment, I would suggest, is that this dissociation from feeling was in the first place a remedy for an intolerable situation. To recover would be to reconnect with those passions that were intolerable in the first place.

    According to Hume's understanding, the passions - giving a damn - are what motivates one to do something, anything. Reason will work out the seventh digit of pi iff passion wants to know. These are not separate beings, reason and passion, but aspects of one being. I am a passionate and reasonable being, but passion is the engine, reason merely the gearbox.

    I wonder if anyone will understand me if i say thatidentification is dissociation. Identifying as the gearbox, the reasoner, the inner world, is dissociating from passion, from pain, from giving a damn. The safety of numbness is the prison of depression. If this is correct, there is nothing substantial that needs to be or can be done; all that is required is a change of mind, a change of identification, and that can happen in the blink of an eye.
  • Philosophy of depression.
    Let's leave the politics for another thread, eh? But poetics is good, if you can avoid the counterproductive condemnation.

    There now, they're all gone,
    almost as if they never had been
    I turn my eyes backwards and I gaze into my own gaze
    I turn my eyes inwards and I gaze into my own face

    I built my prison stone by stone
    how many useless knots I tied
    I dug the pitfalls in my path
    how many useless tears I cried
    here to build in worlds of beauty
    no-one made a joy a duty
    no-one, no-one but me

    I saw the birds that flew so free
    I envied them their grace divine
    I saw the dancer's airy steps
    theirs was a different world than mine
    here to build in worlds of glory
    no-one made my sad sad story
    no-one, no-one but me

    when useless walls come tumbling down
    sparrows will sing on the fallen stones
    Adam will pull the knife from his brow
    Eve will lick the salt from his wounds
    free to make my own tomorrow
    free to free my heart from sorrow
    free to hear and smell and see
    free to be me, free to be free

    Cutting the Strings
  • Philosophy of depression.
    A few somewhat disconnected comments on comments...

    Returning to this rather important point, I think that the truism in philosophy about rationality being the handmaiden of the passions is worth bringing up. If one subscribes to this notion, then rationality is only something instrumental to the passions and can't help in treating such emotions.Question

    Even a hardline Humean would not go so far; reason is the slave of passion, but the slave can still help the master. If one is unhappy that there is no sugar for the coffee, reason can usefully direct one to the grocer rather than the iron-monger for the remedy. The curiosity of depression is that it is in some way an anti-passion; it does not seem to motivate very well.

    Perhaps ask yourself this; do you enjoy depression?TimeLine

    There is something important here, but to put it this way does not make it easy to get at. Perhaps one could put it more open-endedly, that there may be a function, that depression 'works' in some way as a response to the world. Another question that I like better is, "what are you depressing?" It might be sometimes, perhaps not always, that depression is a way of coping with other feelings that cannot be resolved and cannot be tolerated either - shame, guilt, rage, or some such. Thus one does not exactly enjoy depression, but it could be better than the feelings one would have if one was not depressed.

    Actually, that's a hallmark of this problem; there are those who have never experienced depression. Those people, in fact, don't know what the experience is like, and can therefore add no meaningful thoughts into the discussion.Noble Dust

    This is a very radical position; one does not normally require that a doctor suffers from every complaint he treats, let alone a philosophical enquirer. But there is certainly some validity, to the extent at least that those who pontificate without either experience or listening will probably miss the mark.

    Let me give it a shot. It's like the feeling of being outside of the world, in a glass box, observing "real people" live "real life", while I sit outside, floating in space, observing life and imagining what it would be like if I was "inside"; living real life. It's like I'm a scientist in an observatory, observing far-off life forms enact a theoretical world that I (theoretically) think I want to be a part of.Noble Dust

    This is a very clear characterisation that immediately suggests to me a way of understanding depression in terms of an active response to an intolerable and inescapable situation. One creates a dissociated identity as a refuge to preserve oneself from an overwhelming world. 'I' take refuge in the safety of an inner world that cannot be touched by the outer world, only to discover that I have become isolated and cannot in turn touch the world. And from there, one can see at once that there is no help for this dissociated self, either from itself or from the other in the outer world, and the only solution is for it to die.

    Fortunately, this psychological death can be accomplished without physical death; indeed physical death does not do it at all. The inner self cannot by any means reach the outer world, but the inner self can end, and then one finds one is already in and part of the outer world. This is a terrifying prospect, to become, as one once was, completely vulnerable to the world, and this terror is what makes it seem impossible.
  • Philosophy of depression.
    Depression is a diagnosis -- meaning that it is a term for an illness, with which there is at least the desire for a cure and a set of symptoms which indicate that this description of the illness is true and this cure is what is needed to extirpate said illness.Moliere

    Compare:
    Rabies is a diagnosis...
    Possession by devils is a diagnosis...

    It sounds a bit odd. Following the use/mention convention, you would be better to say that "depression" is a diagnosis - a diagnosis is a naming, not an illness (or even a disorder) - but personally I like the old-fashioned term here, that depression (not the name this time) is a 'complaint', because one can name the complaint without making unwarranted ontological assumptions one way or the other. Thus one can say that homosexuality is a complaint whenever someone complains about it, even if the current medical response is 'get used to it'. It used to be considered an illness to be treated, and so did possession by devils.

    One does not see many threads on the philosophy of possession by devils these days, nor on the latest cures for homosexuality. And there is a change of language in the reporting of the latter - not 'I've got homosexuality', but 'I am homosexual.' And this is where, I see the op heading - towards a position where one no longer wishes to be 'cured' of being the person that one is, even if one happens to be a melancholic.

    Patient: I keep thinking I'm Moses.
    Doctor: Keep taking the tablets.
  • Is unrestricted omnipotence immune to all contradictions?
    Contradictions set limits to what can be meaningfully said; they do not constrain the world. If God doesn't fit into your way of talking, it's your problem, not His, just as if you can't get your head round wave particle duality, quantum mechanics isn't going to conform itself to your limitations.
  • On suicidal thoughts.
    ... the monster of Dark Pointlessness doesn't go away. I see him right across the room from me now.mcdoodle

    Could you ask him from me how he feels about his life? Does he feel it is a worthwhile project to be stalking a philosopher so persistently, or does he have his own monster of Dark Pointlessness, that he is desperately keeping at bay by busying himself this way?

    Just as every cop is a criminal
    And all the sinners saints
    As heads is tails
    Just call me Lucifer
    'Cause I'm in need of some restraint
    (Who who, who who)
    So if you meet me
    Have some courtesy
    Have some sympathy, and some taste
    (Woo woo)
    Use all your well-learned politesse
    Or I'll lay your soul to waste, mm yeah
    (Woo woo, woo woo)
    Pleased to meet you
    Hope you guessed my name, mm yeah
    (Who who)
    But what's puzzling you
    Is the nature of my game.

  • On suicidal thoughts.
    The most profound aspect that bothers me is a lack of desire or will to do things in my best interest.Question

    Who cares what's good for you eh? That's a monstrous attitude.

    No wonder the poor monster has nightmares about you.

    No wait, are you the monster having nightmares, or are you the nightmare having monsters? Are you the selfish git that wants what's in your best interest, or the self-condemning git that doesn't? It's all so confusing. Will the real Question please?

    How do you deal with your 'monster'? Have any of you defeated it?Question

    Ask your monster questions, what is it trying to do, what does it want, is it really your enemy? Try and become its servant, it will reward you. Killing yourself kills the monster, that's significant. But don't kill the monster, it's your best friend.
  • Methods of creation
    No, nothing new here. Interesting slide from creativity to uniqueness. Every snowflake is unique, but snow is nothing new.
  • Methods of creation
    1. Think the unthinkable.
    2. Make sense of the resulting nonsense.
    3. Write a detailed account of exactly why every other philosopher in history got it all wrong.

    1 is the tricky bit, despite folks thinking they're doing it all the time. Because it encapsulates the contradiction in your title. To have a method is to be doing the same thing that has been done before; but to be creative is to come up with something new. It is unwise to expect that doing the same thing will result in something new.
  • How should children be reared to be good citizens, good parents, and good thinkers?
    Songs are good. I used to keep our daughter in our shop quite often, and every time a bus went by, I'd sing 'the wheels on the bus go round and round, all day long. And that was her first word at 7 months - 'lor-li-lor'. Which is baby talk for 'all day long', which is unenlightenenedish for 'bus'. Go with the flow, and by one she was having whole sentence conversations with strangers on the train.I'll never forget the excitement of that first discovery, that sounds mean things - that big thing's got a name, and I know it!
  • How should children be reared to be good citizens, good parents, and good thinkers?
    You teach an infant to talk by talking to them and listening to them as if they already understand and already talk.
    So treat your child as a good citizen, a good thinker, a good parent; take them seriously and they will be seriously worth taking seriously.
  • What is the value of a human life?
    So if I can't go beyond subjectivity, how can I know the truth about what a human life is worth.intrapersona

    My life is worth everything to me, probably not so much to you. And vice versa I'd imagine. If a fiver would save your life, I might be persuaded, and a fiver well spent will certainly save a life in Africa. So I could probably save a life for the cost of this bottle of wine I'm drinking. But I'm drinking the wine. So even subjectively, there is not a fixed price, and not every life has subjective value to me.

    This is 'how you can know the truth', look at how you live.
  • The Epistemology of Mental Illness Diagnosis
    If someone possesses a trait that, if all members of the species possessed would mean the demise of the species - like being hostile to other members, then that would be sufficient to call that trait an illness.Harry Hindu

    That is completely ridiculous. If everyone was a full time writer, or a woman, or for that matter, a metal worker, the species would die out. But these are not illnesses.

    If all the bees were queens, the species would die out, and if all the bees were workers, the species would die out, and if all the bees were drones, the species would die out. Therefore all bees are ill.

    You seem to just like to be contrarian for the sake of it. :(
  • Appropriate Emotions
    What don't you understand here?Andrew4Handel

    I can quite see that beliefs and memories can be false, and thus 'inappropriate', but at first glance, how i feel about things is not capable of being false. If I don't like Star Wars, it might be unusual, but to call it inappropriate seems like a category error. My belief that it is the work of the devil can be challenged, and my memory that the doctor is sexist in it can be challenged, and that might change how I feel, but if I have my facts straight, it does not seem that my feelings are the sort of thing that can be 'wrong'.
  • What are emotions?
    I think that we can learn to speak differently,Mariner

    Language is ontology.Mariner

    I'm having difficulty putting these two together. If language is ontology, then speaking differently is an act of creation ex-nihilo - is that right? That puts the poet/ novelist/ playwright at the heart of things...
  • Poll: Political affiliation of this forum
    Old farts are naturally conservative as youth is naturally revolutionary. The youth of today will probably find that the good old days I hanker for are a bit leftwards of the current extreme left, but that's the myopia of youth.
  • Poll: Religious adherence on this forum
    I am a self-made man who worships his maker.
  • ATTENTION: Post Removal!
    More importantly, I'm not Welsh. I just live here.