So if a woman asks you out for coffee you'd think it appropriate to start rubbing your dick!

I thought he “reached into his trousers”. I haven’t seen the scene, but the article makes no mention of dick rubbing. Have you seen it?

No. He was impeached for lying under oath and obstruction of justice.

I never said impeach Giuliani. I was just reminiscing about the time where another public figure had consensual sex with a 25 year old and the right lost their mind.

In the Oval Office, and then he lied about it.

From your article:

“ Although unfortunate, the circumstances of the setup appear consensual, with Giuliani led to believe he was being courted.”

Who impeaches a private citizen?

I’m glad I can make an appearance in your hopes and dreams, Tim. But these sorts of hopes are compelling you to vote for the same neoliberal politician who brought us the Iraq war, gave us the largest crime bill in US history, and compromised with segregationists.

Damn. A consensual act with a 25 year old woman? How could you do this, Rudy?

Giuliani brought Hunter’s laptop to the Delaware police, citing illegal images. I wonder if he picked up a girl-sniffing habit from ol’ pop?

I think we've all been gratified to see that he wasnt bright enough to pull off what he seemed to want to.

So yay for whistleblowers.

Yeah, the prognosticators who predicted a future dictator that never arrived. It’s a good little racket. You can keep predicting fascism, and when it never arrives, you can say your slander helped keep it at bay instead of admitting you were wrong about everything.

“Fascistic”—an adjective often bandied about to describe the Trump administration, but it never turns to be accurate. Meanwhile, an illiberal strain of communo-fascism, with actual concentration camps, slave labor, a national socialism, threatens the world, only to be met by the reticence of self-proclaimed antifascists.

Trump’s DOJ is going after Google for unlawfully maintaining monopolies in the markets under the Sherman antitrust act. Silicon Valley soyboys might need to lay off the election interference for a while.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1328941/download

The senate investigation disproved nothing. In fact they have a laundry list.

IV. THE VICE PRESIDENT’S OFFICE AND STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS WERE AWARE OF BUT IGNORED CONCERNS RELATING TO HUNTER BIDEN’S ROLE ON BURISMA’S BOARD.

V. SECRETARY OF STATE JOHN KERRY FALSELY CLAIMED HE HAD NO KNOWLEDGE ABOUT HUNTER BIDEN’S ROLE ON BURISMA’S BOARD.

VI. STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS VIEWED MYKOLA ZLOCHEVSKY AS A CORRUPT, “ODIOUS OLIGARCH,” BUT VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN WAS ADVISED NOT TO ACCUSE ZLOCHEVSKY OF CORRUPTION.

VII. WHILE HUNTER BIDEN SERVED ON BURISMA’S BOARD, BURISMA’S OWNER, ZLOCHEVSKY, ALLEGEDLY PAID A $7 MILLION BRIBE TO UKRAINE’S PROSECUTOR GENERAL’S OFFICE TO CLOSE THE CASE.

VIII. HUNTER BIDEN: A SECRET SERVICE PROTECTEE WHILE ON BURISMA’S BOARD.

IX. OBAMA ADMINISTRATION OFFICIALS AND A DEMOCRAT LOBBYING FIRM HAD CONSISTENT AND SIGNIFICANT CONTACT WITH FORMER UKRAINIAN OFFICIAL ANDRII TELIZHENKO.

X. THE MINORITY FALSELY ACCUSED THE CHAIRMEN OF ENGAGING IN A RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN AND USED OTHER TACTICS TO INTERFERE IN THE INVESTIGATION.

XI. HUNTER BIDEN’S AND HIS FAMILY’S FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS WITH UKRAINIAN, RUSSIAN, KAZAKH AND CHINESE NATIONALS RAISE CRIMINAL CONCERNS AND EXTORTION THREATS.

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/HSGAC_Finance_Report_FINAL.pdf

The political censorship of the New York Post story has nearly doubled the attention in the story, according to Technology Review. Not exactly the smartest move. But even though no parties have disputed the validity of the emails, we’ve gone from “Russian disinfo” to “Hunter isn’t running for president”, minds whipping like a windsock in whatever direction the propaganda tells them to.

I do not necessarily agree with the left/right distinction. There are some principled lefties who have been critical of the Biden/Ukraine saga, and righties who have called it Russian disinfo.

Many Bernie bros and former Obama-voters have flipped to Trump, many vocal conservatives have flipped to Biden. I think there are new divides at work here.

Your concerns about Biden are dead on. Hunter Biden is the product of affluence and power par excellence. While Biden’s crime bills led to mass incarceration, his crackhead son has avoided troubles. As the recent emails make clear, Hunter and his partners profited off the Biden, at the very least. Biden is possibly compromised, a national security threat.

(Just a small correction: the outlet that reported on the emails was the New York Post, the paper of Hamilton.)

Basically everything the alt-right accuses the left of is usually a projection of something they themselves are guilty of, so even without the details you give to support this claim, it's prima facie probable.

There were those high-profile Virginia Giuffre accusations she made against many, including 2 Dem politicians, governor Bill Richardson and former Democratic Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell. In the same deposition, she says she never saw Trump and Epstein together, let alone at any of his homes, and she claims previous reporting on Trump’s involvement was fake news.

So I wonder if the projection statement is a little ironic.

It was confirmed by one of the people in the emails, none of whom are Russian.

Mr. Lude (Wang DingGang), a Chinese dissident, has been making some huge accusations regarding the Bidens and the CCP.

(Given his ties to Guo Wengui, Steve Bannon and Rudy Giuliani, Lude is immediately suspect as an anti-CCP propagandist, and everything he says could be an influence ploy.
So I post this not to convince anyone, but to make aware some of the efforts of Trump’s close allies. It would be interesting to see if this rears it’s head in the media within the next couple weeks.)

Here is a recent picture of Lude with Giuliani, Bannon, and Chinese virologist Li-Meng Yan. Bannon has been working with Chinese dissidents for quite some time.

There is a recent book called Cynical Theories that goes into good enough detail where the current “wokism”, and it’s illiberal spread, comes from.

But I think the current wokism is unique insofar as it is a ideology of the privileged. I say this because it was formed in the halls of Ivy League America and spread throughout expensive universities and corporate boardrooms before being laundered to the public. It is an illiberal movement focussing on identitarian activism and power struggles.

Source on alleged Hunter Biden email chain verifies message about Chinese investment firm

One of the people on an explosive email thread allegedly involving Hunter Biden has corroborated the veracity of the messages, which appear to outline a payout for former Vice President Joe Biden as part of a deal with a Chinese energy firm.

One email, dated May 13, 2017, and obtained by Fox News, includes a discussion of “remuneration packages” for six people in a business deal with a Chinese energy firm. The email appeared to identify Hunter Biden as “Chair / Vice Chair depending on agreement with CEFC,” in an apparent reference to now-bankrupt CEFC China Energy Co.

The email includes a note that “Hunter has some office expectations he will elaborate.” A proposed equity split references “20” for “H” and “10 held by H for the big guy?” with no further details. Fox News spoke to one of the people who was copied on the email, who confirmed its authenticity.

Sources told Fox News that "the big guy" is a reference to the former vice president. The New York Post initially published the emails and other controversial messages that Fox News has also obtained.

This story is getting crazier. Looks like “the big guy” has some explaining to do.

Another Hunter Biden article from the Post, this time outlining his lucrative deals with China. It looks like Joe Biden’s trip with Hunter in 2013 really paid off. If Biden wins it’s going to be great returning to the same ideologies that have hollowed out America for the past 40 years. China wins.

Emails reveal how Hunter Biden tried to cash in big on behalf of family with Chinese firm

It sounds like they are going to keep dropping articles like this.

If Biden wins it’s going to be great returning to the same policies that have hollowed out America for the past 40 years. China wins.

The suit was dropped because she was intimidated and threatened. Your guy did it and you know it but you don't care. Again, that's all anyone needs to know about you.

This is just more proof you’ll believe anything without evidence. Guilty until proven innocent, an authoritarian wet dream.

Voluntarily dismissed for a third time, right before the last election, and never to be heard from again. Isn’t that convenient. Now that Epstein is dead, I wonder why she won’t come forward?

Either way, whataboutism using 4 year old nonsense is silly at best, desperation at worst.

The woman accusing Donald Trump in a Jane Doe lawsuit of having raped her when she was 13 years old voluntarily dismissed her lawsuit Friday for what appears to be third time.

https://www.courthousenews.com/rape-allegations-refiled-against-trump/amp/

4-year old news and you still only tell half the story.

I’m not a fan of child-touching politicians who have had a life in politics but accomplished nothing, nor am I a fan of his crackhead, deadbeat son. I don’t think Biden and Hunter are easy to trust and like.

Someone left Hunter Biden’s laptop at a repair shop and never came and picked it up. The man made a copy of it before sending it to the FBI, who has had it since December, months before the impeachment charade. You cannot make this stuff up. There are some beauties in here.

Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dad

Hunter Biden introduced his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, to a top executive at a Ukrainian energy firm less than a year before the elder Biden pressured government officials in Ukraine into firing a prosecutor who was investigating the company, according to emails obtained by The Post.

The never-before-revealed meeting is mentioned in a message of appreciation that Vadym Pozharskyi, an adviser to the board of Burisma, allegedly sent Hunter Biden on April 17, 2015, about a year after Hunter joined the Burisma board at a reported salary of up to $50,000 a month.

“Dear Hunter, thank you for inviting me to DC and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spent [sic] some time together. It’s realty [sic] an honor and pleasure,” the email reads.

An earlier email from May 2014 also shows Pozharskyi, reportedly Burisma’s No. 3 exec, asking Hunter for “advice on how you could use your influence” on the company’s behalf.

Other material extracted from the computer includes a raunchy, 12-minute video that appears to show Hunter, who’s admitted struggling with addiction problems, smoking crack while engaged in a sex act with an unidentified woman, as well as numerous other sexually explicit images.

N.Z. isn’t identified in the email but appears to be a reference to Burisma founder Mykola Zlochevsky, whose first name is a Ukrainian version of “Nicholas.”

When the alleged shakedown failed, “they proceeded with concrete actions” in the form of “one or more pretrial proceedings,” Pozharskyi wrote.

“We urgently need your advice on how you could use your influence to convey a message / signal, etc. to stop what we consider to be politically motivated actions,” he added.

Youre being ridiculous. We went over this before. If this line of reasoning is followed, then if someone who would be born, we knew was 100% going to be tortured, we wouldnt consider that future person at all because they werent born yet. So essentially the person has to be born and tortured for this consideration to be relevant. Ridiculous.

Note that all you have to work with is your fantasies—you require the consent of an unborn being, or you’re quite sure an unborn being will be tortured, and so on. But the reality is less noble than the fantasy because it is no different than saying I’m being ethical by using birth control or jerking off into my sock.

It doesn't, and I never said that it did. But that is irrelevant. We require consent for risky actions when we do them unto others.

For example: Going to a theme park has a risk of pleasure and a risk of pain. So depending on the person it may or may not be worth it to go. If person A thinks it's worth going that doesn't justify person A forcing person B to go without consent. The reason behind that is NOT that the risk of going "objectively" outweighs the risk of not going, but simply because person B MAY think that the it does. Maybe person B has a fear of heights or something or hates crowded spaces. That is why person A cannot assume person B will like the theme park simply because A personally liked it. Which is why person A must ask person B first if he wants to go. If person B is not available to be asked, that still doesn't justify person A forcing him to go.

I don’t get this argument. There is no person B because no such being has been born. And it seems to me that a necessary condition of requiring consent for risky actions when we do them unto others is that the other must first exist. Pretending that we require the consent of some non-existent, imaginary person seems nonsensical.

The fact that the subject of anti-natalist concern does not exist gives me reason to believe the anti-natalist has no ethical argument, and instead seeks some round-about praise for his masturbatory activities.

It is a populism based upon fairness and justice that is ale to distinguish between law and order and an abuse of power.

Do you not see the connection?

I do not.

Black Lives Matter

What about it?

But a populism based on fairness and justice is able to distinguish between law-enforcement proper and abuse of power. One is worthy of admiration while the other of scorn. Consequently, one can be for law and order while being against the abuse of power.

You sensationalize the significance, taking cues from you-know-who, but end up chewing on another nothing-burger.

You have already acknowledged the failure with your "Big Deal" comment.

Again, debating the 'ratio' is ridiculous.

And you perpetuate a political lie. Fair enough.

No I wouldn’t, no matter what your little fantasies tell you. Worse, Biden refused to condemn antifa, saying it’s just an idea.



He did, clearly and unambiguously, many times. He even said he was going to label the KKK (and antifa) as terrorist organizations. But these facts don’t exist in the false, hysterical anti-Trump worldview.

As a hypothetical, information that was known to be fake would be an inappropriate basis for an investigation. The problem is that you are jumping to politically biased conclusions based on partisan interpretations of sketchy facts and cries from Trump (in the record books for prevarication) that he's been treated unfairly.

That’s false. The information was suspected of being Russian disinformation. They knew it.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/footnotes-in-watchdog-report-indicate-fbi-knew-of-risk-of-russian-disinformation-in-the-steele-dossier/

I guess you could clear up any confusion by pointing out the media outlets that tell it like it is and report more than crumbs.

The reasonable thing to do is judge reporting on its merits, not on where it comes from.

Nope. Not worth researching all those 'many times' then comparing then debating. That's a loser of a leader.

Of course not. The truth hurts, so might was well pretend, without evidence, that “stand back, stand by” is some secret white supremacist bat signal.

I said anti-Trump media, not left and right. Nevertrumpers run the spectrum of right/left media.

Big deal. He condemned white supremacists many times. I don’t see why he needs to do it to appease some false narrative.

I see no problem with that. Trump has routinely condemned white supremacists and Chris Wallace asked Trump if he would ask them to stand down.

You have repeatedly criticized the vice president for not specifically calling out Antifa and other left wing extremist groups. But are you willing tonight to condemn white supremacists and militia group and to say that they need to stand down and not add to the violence in a number of these cities as we saw in Kenosha and as we’ve seen in Portland.

Trump obliged.