How would p-zombies develop a language that refers to consciousness and/or mental states?

I disagree. I see a very clear justification for armed resistance. — Benkei

A justification for rape, torture, and murder of children? It sounds like you're not even aware of what Hamas has done.

ETA: Reading through the responses, I see you are aware of the atrocities Hamas has done. You just don't care. Or you just don't care when they happen to Jews.

If someone offered you a million dollars on the condition you could never drink again...I wouldn't take the money.

Nothing that Israel has done regarding land justifies that barbarity to people, sorry. That's what you are supporting, and it's sad. — schopenhauer1

Yes, this has caused some people to lose their moral compass.

The complexities of politics and actually reaching peace requires people to talk to each other via other means than through the barrel of a gun or cannon. — Benkei

Or you beat the enemy so badly (e.g., Germany and Japan and the American South), they're so sick of war that they're ready for peace.

I don't. I think you open the borders of israel to all of the west bank and gaza and you just get busloads of dead jews.
— flannel jesus

I doubt it. Most Palestinians are just regular people. — frank

20% of Gazans have a "very positive" view of Hamas (38% "somewhat positive"), according to this:
https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/polls-show-majority-gazans-were-against-breaking-ceasefire-hamas-and-hezbollah

If I were Israel, I would be very leery about opening my door to that group of people.

Not commit war crimes. Not every problem has an acceptable solution. You think that's an excuse to pursue non-acceptable solutions. I don't. — Benkei

"The Nazis entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everybody else and nobody was going to bomb them.

At Rotterdam, London, Warsaw, and half a hundred other places, they put that rather naive theory into operation.

They sowed the wind and now they are going to reap the whirlwind."

You reap what you sow.

What should the Allies have done then to relieve pressure on the Russians?
— RogueAI

Something else — bert1

:roll:

↪RogueAI Yes, carpet bombing was a war crime. — Benkei

What should the Allies have done then to relieve pressure on the Russians?

5,800 dead Palestinian civilians in the meantime. All in "self defence". — Benkei

Civilians get killed in war. Should the Allies not have bombed German cities? The strategic bombing campaign was a great help to Russia, since it caused Germany to divert resources from the Eastern Front to try and fend off the Allied raids. Is your claim then that the Allied air campaign against Germany was wrong? What should the Allies have done then to help the Russians?

Is Hamas smart to release hostages in dribs and drabs? I get the impression every time they do it, they put pressure on Israel for a cease fire.

Yes, I can see how I gave that impression. I have no problems with Muslims, Christians, or Jews, except when their belief systems entail hating on women and LGBTQ.

You're on the verge of sounding racist, dude. I'm sure that's not what you intended. — frank

I despise any group that treats women as second class citizens, whether they be brown, black, or lily white MAGA Republicans.

And so did Israel. Your point being? — Tzeentch

Who would you prefer babysit your toddler? Israel or Hamas? More to the point, who would you trust as a nuclear power, Israel or Iran?

While the possibility remains that the Russian regime turns into some kind of death cult and tries to burn it all down, it doesn't seem to make sense to base any decisions on this possibility. — Echarmion

It doesn't have to be a death cult. The Regime just has to be very desperate, to the point where they start thinking, "a few tactical nukes, strategically placed..." If it looks like Ukraine starts pushing Russia back to their border, or Putin thinks he's about to be overthrown, why not roll the dice, from his point of view? If he thinks it's likely he's going to be deposed and killed, what would he have to lose?

Russia is unable to widen the war without jumping up a nuclear option. — Count Timothy von Icarus

Yes. That's what worries a lot of people.

We've drifted into a very brittle situation, and we don't think Russia will widen the war because Russia hasn't widened the war, but of course that can change. Every weapons system we give the Ukranians carries the risk of escalation. The politicians have to be extremely cautious. It sucks for the Ukranians.

:100:

As a side note, this is an excellent source for human rights abuses by Israel on the occupied territories, by an Israeli Human Rights organization, very much worth looking at in general:

https://www.btselem.org/ — Manuel

The shithole countries in the Middle East are terrorist-loving human rights abusers on a scale that makes Israel look like a piker. Israel should take over that whole sorry region.

At his point in time, given the lack of investigative evidence,
Any suggestion that it's clearly one or the other only reveals the bias of the person offering the opinion.
— Hanover — magritte

:up:

Israel suffered the equivalent of seven 9/11's. Any country in that situation is going to retaliate and make sure such attacks can't happen again. Why should we hold Israel to some unrealistic standard that doesn't exist in the real world?

:smile:

They have done nothing to deserve it. — NOS4A2

They're building weapons to fund the war effort. I'm not asking whether they "deserve it", but rather "is it immoral to bomb munition factory workers?" If you are fighting a war, and you can end the war by destroying the enemy's war-making industries, don't you have a moral obligation to your own people to do so?

I was snarky. My apologies.

Who you rather have won WW2, the Allies or Axis? It's a really easy question to answer, is it not?
— RogueAI

I don't find it easy. I know roughly where we are, but I have little idea of where we would be if everything was different. — unenlightened

Really now. You actually have to think about whether America or Nazi Germany should have won?

Because they're just trying to make a living? — frank

A) people in the military are trying to make a living too
B) people working in armaments factories aren't JUST trying to make a living. They're helping the war effort as well.

The idea of bombing civilians with any kind of bomb would strike most sensitive people as immoral. — frank

Why is it immoral to bomb workers in armaments factories?

And this is where Israel has not been justified in it's more limited military actions since 1973. The entire "mowing the grass," philosophy of counter terrorism they developed was morally bankrupt because it was counter productive in terms of long term peace. It couldn't reasonably be expected to ever lead to lasting peace. — Count Timothy von Icarus

The difference here though is that after WW2 was over, Japan and Germany were done fighting. They were whipped and submitted meekly to the Allies. Would the U.S. have done the Marshall Plan if Germany was still determined to eradicate the Allies?

The only "side" that ever nuked anybody was the "Allies". — Benkei

Who you rather have won WW2, the Allies or Axis? It's a really easy question to answer, is it not?

This was a giant question for me back in the day. I had a philosophical epiphany over it. Probably off topic though? — frank

I don't know. Seems pretty on-topic.

And yet, you didn't answer my question: who would you prefer won WW2? Let me answer for you: The Allies. I'm sure you agree. And yet, the Allies killed an ungodly number of civilians. Doesn't this suggest that in a conflict, even if one side kills huge numbers of civilians, they can still be the side to "root for"?

Let me ask you another question: Who would you rather trust with nuclear weapons? Hamas/Hezbollah/Iran or Israel? Of course, Israel.

Yes, the Allies also committed plenty of war crimes. — Benkei

But you would still prefer the Allies had won WW2, right?

Morality 101, don't bomb civilians. — frank

We bombed civilians in WW2. Did that make us the bad guys?

In any conflict, I give this question a lot of significance: "Who would you rather live under?" In this case, the answer is obvious: Israel. Nobody here would choose to be governed by Hamas, or Hezbollah, or Iran. How much significance should we give that when determining who to back in this conflict?

It looks like it's going to end with no Palestinians in Gaza, in other words, a massacre. — frank

The Allies massacred civilians on a level Israel can only dream of in WW2. Yet that did not create a moral equivalence between the Allied and Axis powers.

Do you think a mindless universe is possible? What do you think would happen to this universe if all minds disappeared? Would the stars, galaxies, planets, etc. still be here?

But peace can be made with Hamas. — Benkei

Don't they want to annihilate Israel?

:up:

What does your theory have to say about machine consciousness?

Could consciousness be a form of energy like the rest? — Benj96

What happens to the consciousness when energy is transformed into matter?