Biden doesn't bring anything to the table except "not Trump" — Benkei
I'm not sure it makes any difference, but I think you have left out two options. I think the options are:-
1. A beginning, but no end (your ray).
2. An end, but no beginning.
3. No beginning and no end (your line).
etc. — Ludwig V
What evidence do you have that fishfry left because of this thread? — TonesInDeepFreeze
The philosophical claims themselves are errant for not even being correctly about what they are supposed to be about. — TonesInDeepFreeze
Female bouldering problems are notoriously easier than males in competition. — AmadeusD
Posts are missing from this thread, including some of my own. What happened? — TonesInDeepFreeze
Anyway, did someone say "beyond infinity"? — TonesInDeepFreeze
I don't believe I'm the one saying untrue things — Philosopher19
I would do 15 consecutive muscle-ups as practice for that explosive power (dynamics, which I eventually introduced to rock climbing) — jgill
The explosive power there is absolutely immense (bouldering particularly). It has translated into Gymnastics
High bar, though? Requires far too much explosive power to be compared, imo. — AmadeusD
It is not particularly conceivable, imo, having done Gymnastics for some years and continue to do fairly high-level calisthenics. There is absolutely no comparison. — AmadeusD
I ask as there is no possible way women are doing the same skills men are in on pommel horse, floor routines, high bar — AmadeusD
Before and after (time) are simply here and there (space). — Fire Ologist
If she claims that she is within her rights to act this way because of an invasion she is advancing a legal opinion — Fooloso4
See, "because it has no prior cause" does not answer the reason why any particular cause is a first cause — Metaphysician Undercover
And this is the level of discourse climate deniers engage in, folks — Mikie
At what point does a citizen reinterpret the flow of illegal immigrants into the USA as an "invasion"? — jgill
At no point. — Fooloso4
So, let’s call it what it really is: Racist fear mongers blaming a Democratic administration for an overblown problem — Mikie
Governor Greg Abbott issued a declaration arguing he has the legal power to overrule federal authorities in case of an “invasion.” — Fooloso4
The first cause is only in the first time tick. In the second time tick, the state of existence is caused by the first cause. — Philosophim
Yes, I've talked to a lot of young people about all of this and they say that "there's no point". An utter surrender to whatever downfall of society or humanity that will come — Christoffer
You wake up in the morning and find yourself back to back in bed with an unconscious violinist. A famous unconscious violinist. He has been found to have a fatal kidney ailment, and the Society of Music Lovers has canvassed all the available medical records and found that you alone have the right blood type to help. They have therefore kidnapped you, and last night the violinist's circulatory system was plugged into yours, so that your kidneys can be used to extract poisons from his blood as well as your own. [If he is unplugged from you now, he will die; but] in nine months he will have recovered from his ailment, and can safely be unplugged from you.
Are aleph-1 infinities useful in the sciences? Difficult question — alan1000
:roll:As hard as it might be to believe, in Canada a 50-year-old man really is being allowed to compete in swimming competitions alongside 13- and 14-year-old girls. Melody Wiseheart, formerly Nicholas Cepeda, is a professor of psychology and behavioural science at York University in Toronto, specialising in children and young people.
Anyone out there afraid to try and objectively view Fox News? — Steven P Clum
...but represents the convergents of analytic continued fractions... — jgill
The key word here is "represents". The problem with representations is that they do not qualify as being the thing which they represent. That's why the word "represents" is used, to signify that it stands for something, but it is not itself the thing which it stands for. And to complicate this problem we can create representations which are completely fictional, having no real thing which they correspond with. They represent something imaginary. So in a discussion of whether or not infinite chains are real, a representation of an infinite chain serves no purpose. — Metaphysician Undercover
And yet, still easy enough to get it exactly wrong. — Fooloso4
(2021)Robert Gates, the former defense secretary under President Obama, seemed to reiterate in an interview that aired Sunday night that he believes President Biden has been wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades.
Gates, who spent about three decades in the CIA, was introspective during an interview with CBS’ "60 Minutes," and was asked by Anderson Cooper, the correspondent, about his 2014 memoir titled, "Duty: Memoirs of a Secretary at War."
When I speak of a chain receding to infinity that doesn't leave much to grasp at philosophically, so one resorts to the "being" of the chain , like yanking on an emergency cord. — jgill
What I find in metaphysics is logical demonstrations as to why this idea of "a chain receding to infinity" is unrealistic. That type of chain is shown to be logically consistent and therefore logically possible, and even attractive to some people, as seductive in a a sort of aesthetic or emotional way. . . . . Of course there is an issue with inductive principles as shown by Hume, so those who enjoy thinking about, and conceiving, chains receding to infinity, often feel justified in presenting these as if they could be real physical existents — Metaphysician Undercover
I really wish you would stop demeaning the post without anything but a deriding opinion. I have answered your questions and critiques, so I would like a little more respect for what I've written here. Either demonstrate the argument is false, or not. — Philosophim
The simplest models exhibiting chaotic behavior may be simple, but real functions are anything but — noAxioms
and all that we've discussed (who gets conceived/born, which creatures evolve) is very much a function of the weather, among countless other factors, most notably wave function collapse. — noAxioms
. . . science can't avoid philosophy while at the same time its methods don't lead to the Ideas — Gregory
Science is fine but it doesn't go anywhere — Gregory
Read up on chaos theory. I can't possibly explain it to you in this context. — noAxioms
They have quantum teleporters, which means they actually have teleported a small object from here to there — noAxioms
I like "timelines", but only those I initiate. — jgill
What is this sort of timeline, and how does one go about initiating one? — noAxioms
↪jgill
You seem to be saying that mathematics is a greater source of truth than philosophy's pursuit of the ineffable. The later can't be put into words but it can be pointed at and knowledge of this wordless truth can grow — Gregory
Isn't that part of the fun though? Didn't you get to think about something new and different? Did you stretch your mind? Perhaps similar lines of thinking may do you well in your applications of theoretical math moving forward. I really do hope you enjoyed thinking about it. — Philosophim
'Change of movement through time'. What an interesting way of putting it. — noAxioms