The Philosophy Forum

  • Forum
  • Members
  • HELP

  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    ...what if the goal of a science isn't to be factually correct? — Banno
    The goal of science? Science (as a whole) is not a goal driven enterprise. Science is about making discoveries.

    Science, for instance, lead to the mustard gas, the atom bomb, flame throwers, paper shredders, tnt, LRAD, and the electric chair. — Ennui Elucidator
  • Stuff Thread
    https://anthropology.stanford.edu/research-projects/subsistence-and-livelihood
    https://comparewords.com/livelihood/subsistence

    https://secure.ethicspoint.com/domain/en/report_information.asp?clientid=68816&violationtypeid=95092&locationid=-1

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_dishonesty
  • Stuff Thread
    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/go-through-the-motions
  • Stuff Thread
    https://examples.yourdictionary.com/examples-of-skills.html
  • Stuff Thread
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Dewey_Decimal_classes
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    I prefer the non-literal approach, where Amelek represents evil and the reminder that such actually exists. One shouldn't have sympathy for the devil I suppose it is to mean. — Hanover
    Good. :up:
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    Amelek tribe. God ordered the death of all their people, including killing all their animals. — Hanover
    Yeah, and I was taught in Yeshivah that we don't know who Amelek is. (I also happen to know some Jewish fundamentalists who believe the Germans are Amelek.)
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    portray the Jews as laying waste to quite a number of cities and tribes in their conquest of the Promised Land. — Ciceronianus
    There's also the genocide of Amelek
  • Abortion and the ethics of lockdowns
    But anyway, you're either being tedious for the sake of sadistic delight (oo, look at me being torturously stupid to a clever person), or you're genuinely baffled, in which case you need to work with your hands and leave the thinking to others. — Bartricks
    :victory:
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    Yes, i was just born in a than communist occupied country and all the atrocities they committed are still pretty fresh in our collective memory, — stoicHoneyBadger
    Communism is horrible! :hearts:
  • Abortion and the ethics of lockdowns
    I am opposed to enforced lockdowns to protect us against viruses. — Bartricks
    How is that philosophy?? It's a political statement! :roll:
  • Abortion and the ethics of lockdowns
    ↪tim wood
    Dangerous irony. :death:
  • Abortion and the ethics of lockdowns
    Folks, Bartricks denies that refusing to take a vaccine entails risks to others than himself. Such silliness is not to be reasoned with. Is he that stupid? — tim wood
    He's coming at it from a philophical perspective.

    Well, it was stupid. It had no philosophical content. — Bartricks
    Okay. Where can i read up about the philosophy of COVID viruses? I need to be infomed.
  • Some remarks on Wittgenstein's private language argument (PLA)
    Gertie says, "Experiential states exist as private certain knowledge to the experiencing subject.
    My question is, if experiential states are so private, why is he talking about them!
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    What we will lack is the "profit motive" — Michael Zwingli
    What profit motive? Most people are just trying to make a living.
  • Some remarks on Wittgenstein's private language argument (PLA)
    Imagine a private language, i.e., just one that you're creating. Now try to imagine that you have to remember how to use all the words/concepts involved in your language. — Sam26
    I'm stuck here. It's hard to imagine a language that doesn't rely on any sort of social conventions.
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    the state as intermediary of all function and arbiter of all decision-making. — Michael Zwingli
    And say goodbye to private business!
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    like what do you want, a history lesson? :D use google for that. ;) — stoicHoneyBadger
    I'm not going to do your job. :angry:
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    Russian October revolution rings a bell? — stoicHoneyBadger
    That's not confirmation.
  • Some remarks on Wittgenstein's private language argument (PLA)
    Gertie's statement — Sam26
    he statement, is directly connected to much of what Wittgenstein talks about in the PLA. — Sam26
    I can't get into this. Thank you for your time. :victory:
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    AKA "progressive liberals — Michael Zwingli
    They're all Marxists??
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    whenever Marxists come to power, it always end in a totalitarian state and misery & concentrations camps for the people. — stoicHoneyBadger
    Do you have any confirmation for this claim?
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    Just know that their goal is to get political power, not "make things better". — stoicHoneyBadger
    That's just your opinion...
  • Some remarks on Wittgenstein's private language argument (PLA)
    Given his thinking about how language develops, viz., that it's not a totally private affair, it's done necessarily with other people — Sam26
    Why does he think it is necessary? Wittgenstein doesn't seem to be very rigorous.
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    race hustlers? — stoicHoneyBadger
    Marxists.
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    And what do you think are correct representations? — stoicHoneyBadger
    I would have to ask them in person.
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    Critical race theory, for example, teaches black kids that they would not be able to succeed in life because of their skin color, — stoicHoneyBadger
    Feminism, pretty much the same, telling women that there is a 'glass ceiling', that men won't allow them to succeed. — stoicHoneyBadger
    Those are misrepresentations.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
  • Some remarks on Wittgenstein's private language argument (PLA)
    ↪Sam26
    But could we imagine a language in which a person could write down or give vocal expression to his inner experiences — Sam26
    Why does Wittgenstein mention "imagination"?
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    Marxist ideology that tells some problematic group that all their problems are because the other group is oppressing them — stoicHoneyBadger
    Can you give an example?
  • The Decay of Science
    all talk, no listen. — Metaphysician Undercover
    I listen to people who have manners!
  • The Decay of Science
    Did you not read my posts? — Metaphysician Undercover
    I didn't read.
  • The Decay of Science
    Is this difficult for you to understand? — Metaphysician Undercover
    It is difficult to understand. :rage:
  • The Decay of Science
    corrections come from outside science — Metaphysician Undercover
    Where outside?
  • The Decay of Science
    ↪Metaphysician Undercover

    I didn't say that.
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    splitting the society into oppressors vs oppressed — stoicHoneyBadger
    Are you referring to Social conflict theory ?
  • The Decay of Science
    Exactly what Thunderballs says, science is not self-contained. — Metaphysician Undercover
    Didn't say that.
  • Some remarks on Wittgenstein's private language argument (PLA)
    All "Prove me wrong" means is that your mind is made up and there is nothing I can say that will change it — Sam26
    I'm not sure exactly what my mind is made up about. :confused:

    I'm against the proposition that philosophers can tell you what you can imagine. How's that?
  • Some remarks on Wittgenstein's private language argument (PLA)
    Okay," what kind of response is that — Sam26
    It means that i don't have the proper vocabulary to argue with you.
  • The Decay of Science
    Science isn't a self-correcting system though, because it needs guidance from theory and hypothesis — Metaphysician Undercover
    Where's the logic in that?
  • what if the goal of a religion isn't to be factually correct?
    Science is the most intolerant culture. — Thunderballs
    I think you'll like this guy.
    :point: https://youtu.be/JKHUaNAxsTg
Home » Wheatley
More Comments

Wheatley

Start FollowingSend a Message
  • About
  • Comments
  • Discussions
  • Uploads
  • Other sites we like
  • Social media
  • Terms of Service
  • Sign In
  • Created with PlushForums
  • © 2025 The Philosophy Forum