• Tao follows Nature
    Yes, but what is a thing really in relation to the Tao, such that things should come from it? Are things made of the Tao, or are they made of something else that did not originate in the Tao? I'm a monist, and thus i believe that whatever things are, they are made of one "thing" or, more precisely, one "non-thing".punos

    Sorry, I did it again. I push "post comment before I'd fully responded.

    I've thought a lot about the process of the 10,000 things growing out of the Tao. I still don't have a definitive understanding. The Tao is not part of anything and nothing is part of the Tao. I'll take the easy way out. This is from Mitchell's translation of Verse 42.

    The Tao gives birth to One.
    One gives birth to Two.
    Two gives birth to Three.
    Three gives birth to all things.
    — Verse 42 of the Tao Te Ching

    I've heard it said that the Two is Yin and Yang or Heaven and Earth and the Three is the Tao and Two together. I'm not sure what that means.

    The Tao can, in part, be conceived as the mathematical value (or non-value/non-thing/nothing) of 0 (zero)... This is also the kind of thing that happens with the quantum, or false vacuum at the very foundation of our universe.punos

    I don't know what the first sentence means and in the second sentence are you mixing up metaphysics and physics again.
  • Tao follows Nature
    Because i take Taoist principles to heart i use those principles to understand my world better as well, and that includes my understanding of science and other fields. I can use these principles to help know how to act in the world, how to relate to myself in my thoughts and emotions, and to others, but i can not help recognizing these Taoist principles in other areas like physics, and particularly quantum physics. In fact it was what i've learned about science and physics that gave me what i consider insights into the Tao, and to further elaborate what the ancients were apprehending.punos

    I actually agree with much of this, although I suspect I mean something different by it than you do.
  • Tao follows Nature
    To name is to divine or distinguish one thing from an other. Zhuangzi's Cook Ting (Ding) divides the ox along its natural joints. To divide things in a way that is contrary to their natural divisions is to force things. The proper division of things requires knowing the natural patterns and organization of things. Knowing what belongs together, what is a part of some larger thing as well as what is separable toward some end or purpose.Fooloso4

    I wonder if I understand you correctly. Are you saying that process of carving the ox is analogous to the process of the Tao bringing the 10,000 things into existence. I've never thought of it that way before, but it's an interesting take. I'll think about it more.
  • Tao follows Nature
    Information has the quality of spirit in this regard, and in this sense can be considered both physical and metaphysical simultaneously. Energy has a similar quality as well.punos

    I don't know whether or not I agree with you about information. I'll think about it. I definitely don't agree with you about energy.
  • Tao follows Nature
    I'm not trying to convince you or anyone about anything...If we really agreed on everything, then we wouldn't really have anything to talk about... don't you think?punos

    I left my response to this from my previous post.

    I don't need people to agree with me about my views, but I need to test whether I really understand, even believe, what seems right to me. I also find that hearing other people's ideas and their responses to my statements helps me clarify, and sometimes even change, how I see things.
  • Tao follows Nature
    How does one measure a single 0-dimensional point inside a non-zero dimensional space? It cannot be measured because measurement requires a beginning and an end point. It cannot be done with a single point. How does one measure one instance of time? It cannot be done for the same reason; one needs two instances to measure the time interval between them. For anything to be measurable and quantifiable, it must have a beginning and end point of measurement.punos

    I don't understand how this is relevant. Scientists hypothesize physical dark matter based on requirements of theories of gravitation even though it's never been measured. I can know that a question will have a true or false answer even if I don't know what it is yet.
  • Tao follows Nature
    Also, i make a strong connection between what the Greeks called the Logos to the Tao. I believe they were trying to explain the same thing, but in different cultural contexts.punos

    I don't know enough about Greek philosophy to comment on this specifically, but the basic idea of an unnamable reality underlying our everyday world is common to many philosophies, e.g. I see Kant's noumena as analogous to the Tao.
  • Tao follows Nature
    I guess one can put it in those terms. The world that comes into existence by naming is the world in our own minds, the world of culture or in the world of the "King".punos

    This is similar to how I see it.

    When a baby is born and has opened its eyes for the first time it does not see things, it just sees a buzzing confusion, but as soon as the child learns to connect a word or a name to a thing, then it is able to bring that thing into its own world view, and by doing this the child enters or becomes a citizen of the human condition, the world of culture, the "King".punos

    I don't think this is accurate from a psychological and neurological perspective. Babies are not blank slates. They bring their own perspectives and capacities into the world with them. Konrad Lorenz wrote that human brains and minds are formed by natural selection to interact effectively with the world they will live in. Here's a link to an article he wrote I really like -

    https://archive.org/details/KantsDoctrineOfTheAPrioriInTheLightOfContemporaryBiologyKonradLorenz

    For me the term "name" symbolizes pattern. A thing is its pattern, and things with different patterns are assigned other patterns that we call names.punos

    This is similar to how I see it.
  • Tao follows Nature
    Geez Louise, you're getting way ahead of me. Give me a chance to catch up.

    If the Tao is supposed to be the origin of all things, then how is the quantum vacuum not at least in some way the Tao? What is it about the quantum vacuum that tells you it is not the Tao? What feature of the Tao is missing in the quantum vacuum in your view?punos

    I'll say what I always say - the Tao is metaphysics. I'm an admirer of R.G. Collingwood who said that metaphysics is the study of absolute presuppositions - the underlying assumptions, usually unspoken and unconscious, that underly our understanding of reality. Absolute presuppositions are not true or false - they have no truth value.

    The ancient Taoists had no idea of the way we name things here in the future, so they gave it their own name: the Tao. They had no access to the knowledge we have today and were limited in that respect. Part of my project is to update the Taoist perspective with what is known about nature in our present time. It is great to understand the Taoists on their own terms, from their own time, but what good will it do to simply reiterate what they said today in the same way they said or meant it back then?punos

    I see Taoist principles as useful perspectives on how to think about the world. Why would that change? What would progress even mean? What new language would be required to grasp it? I am an engineer with a pragmatic approach to philosophy. Taoism as expressed in the Tao Te Ching and Chuang Tzu provide a solid and profound foundation for my views.

    If something is not the Tao, then what is it, what could it be instead?punos

    One of the 10,000 things.
  • Tao follows Nature
    A metaphor is a containment device for holding and transmitting universal patterns across space and time for the purpose of recognizing the patterns in other apparently unrelated things.punos

    Ok, but when I say "But soft, what light through yonder window breaks? It is the east, and Juliet is the sun," I don't mean that Juliet is literally the sun. If you say the Tao shares some characteristics with the quantum vacuum I'll go along with you, but that doesn't mean the Tao is actually the quantum vacuum.

    For me, the Tao is a fact, and in fact, it is the only permanent fact.punos

    You and I see things differently.

    Either way, aren’t space and time normally considered metaphysical concepts? Information and causality are also metaphysical concepts. Energy can be seen liminally as both a metaphysical and a physical concept.punos

    I don't see space, time, and energy as metaphysical entities. They are observable, measurable, and quantifiable. I agree causality is metaphysical. I'm not sure about information.
  • Tao follows Nature
    I am not sure what lies at the heart of Lao Tzu's text.Amity

    As I see it, it's a direct wordless experience, not a conceptual understanding.

    All that is fine. However, this doesn't mean that hope is hollow.Amity

    When I experience hope and fear, I recognize their hollowness, meaninglessness. That doesn't mean I can escape their influence. Easier said than done.
  • Tao follows Nature
    The Tao is lovely philosophical Poetry, but it doesn't spell-out specifically what The Way is, the laws of Nature. So we use Science to learn the temporary limits of our toddling explorations.Gnomon

    As I understand it, we don't look to science for guidance, we look within ourselves.
  • Tao follows Nature
    This is a good, thoughtful, well-written post.

    It is not "something",punos

    The fact that the Tao is not a thing was a revelation to me.

    The "silence and the void" refers to an informationless state, which is a pure description of primordial time absent of space. "Standing alone and unchanging" refers to the zero spatial dimensional state and zero entropy. In this state, time has no arrow, while simultaneously possessing the potential for infinite spacial dimensionality out of which the arrow of time emerges.punos

    I'm ok with this if you are being metaphorical, but, in my understanding, Taoist principals are metaphysical, not factual. It doesn't make sense to attribute physical properties to the Tao.

    One way to help conceptualize this idea is to imagine a single stationary pixel displaying on a screen or monitor. To maintain this pixel on the screen, the monitor must constantly reinstate the pixel at every time step. This gives the illusion that the pixel is the same one moment to the next. This constant reinstantiation of the pixel on the screen can be said to be unchanging, present, and in motion. The motion is not spatial but temporal; it supplies temporal continuity and persistence to all that exists.punos

    I like this way of putting it. As I discussed earlier in this thread, I understand the cosmology described in the Tao Te Ching as the constant creation of the world of phenomena followed by a return to the source.

    They called it the "Tao" because they were able to recognize that what was most fundamental was not a material substance but a process, a way of doing, and this implies a rule, a program, an algorithm that makes all things possible. This algorithm is time itself (primordial time). Time is the logic of existence: a supremely simple logic that is singular yet simultaneously infinite in potential.punos

    I'm ok with this, but maybe I see it differently than you do. I see what you call a rule or an algorithm as a representation of the process of naming that brings the world into existance. Is that what you're talking about?

    This describes emergence, the method by which nature creates further complexity and novelty. From primordial time ("Tao"), "heaven" emerges as the first or primary emergence and represents the realm of fundamental particles, atoms, and even molecules (pre-biology). Heaven is good because it serves as the ground from which higher forms can emerge to increase complexity and novelty. From "heaven," "Earth" emerges, symbolizing the emergence of biology and ecosystems. From this emerges the "King", which symbolizes culture and social structures.punos

    Again, I think you are taking an idea I see as poetic and internal and making it literal and concrete.
  • Tao follows Nature
    Sorry, this is going a bit offtrack, away from Twenty-five. I took exception to his translation of Thirteen:

    Success is as dangerous as failure.
    Hope is as hollow as fear.
    Amity

    This is one of the first verses that grabbed me in Mitchell's translation - really opened my eyes. I like it better than any other version. Whether or not it is "authentic," I think it get's right to the heart of what Lao Tzu was trying to say in a way that's more concrete than other versions.
  • Tao follows Nature
    The Jane English version is objectively superior to Stephen Mitchell's version. I am aware that I said something controversial in the previous sentence.Arcane Sandwich

    No, it's not "objectively superior," although many people hate Mitchell's translation and Mitchell himself. It's a matter of preference, i.e. subjective not objective. There is nothing objective about the Tao Te Ching or in it. I think Mitchell has insights that you won't find in other translations. I am very fond of his version, but I acknowledge you need to read others in order to get a more complete picture of what Lao Tzu was trying to show us.

    As others have noted in this thread, speaking authoritatively about the Tao Te Ching and Taoism is misleading and I think it shows a lack of understanding.
  • Tao follows Nature
    Here, there seems to be a separation between vertical levels. 'Low' humans, portrayed as basic, climbing upwards to reach the Taoist Way. Perhaps, an eternal return. I like to think that humans form part of Nature's cycle. We 'follow' as in accompany. So, the form or structure is more of a circle than a ladder.Amity

    This is a good description, although I don't think Lao Tzu saw humanity as a lower level - maybe just more complicated. The Tao Is absolute simplicity or, actually, what comes before absolute simplicity. This is Gia-Fu Feng's translation of Verse 1.

    The Tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao.
    The name that can be named is not the eternal name.
    The nameless is the beginning of heaven and Earth.
    The named is the mother of the ten thousand things.
    Ever desireless, one can see the mystery.
    Ever desiring, one sees the manifestations.
    These two spring from the same source but differ in name;
    this appears as darkness.
    Darkness within darkness.
    The gate to all mystery.
    Tao Te Ching, Verse 1

    I think this shows respect for both the Tao and the 10,000 things, which represent the multiplicity of distinctions in our everyday world. Humanity is one of the 10,000 things.
  • 2025: 50th anniversary of Franco's death...
    That said, I have no idea why Spain strikes him as more repressive than other parts of Europe, and what he thinks the Islamic history has to do with that.Jamal

    This has come up before in different contexts. I try to be honest and self-aware about my prejudices, of which there are many. When I put those attitudes into words, people often take that to mean I endorse that position. I've acknowledged that my attitude is prejudiced. That means I recognize it's not rational. I do my best not to let those attitudes affect my behavior. Generally, I think I can do that pretty well. In this case, I picked the wrong time to speak, which is not that unusual here on the forum or in my life.
  • Draft letter to G. Priest - Epistemic warrant interpretation of a multi-variate computational system
    I look forward to hearing from you.Ennui Elucidator

    I must admit I understood little of what you wrote, but I do have a suggestion. The letter is long and dense. I think you might have a better chance of Priest reading it if you shortened it to a one or two paragraph summary, maybe something like an abstract for an article. Then, if he shows interest, you can hit him with the more complete presentation.
  • Tao follows Nature
    I was questioning the justification for this interpretation which was being presented as the one true interpretation:Janus

    I misunderstood. I thought you were trying to call into question the entire approach of the Tao Te Ching, which would have been outside the scope of the discussion as described in the OP.
  • Tao follows Nature
    it actually does work for me. It and the Bhagavad Gita are two of my favorite texts.Janus

    Then why were you so argumentative?
  • Tao follows Nature
    It’s not so much coincidence as parallel development.Wayfarer

    Thanks. I probably used a confusing word. By "coincidence" I meant that the events described happened at the same time, not that it was (necessarily) a matter of chance. The article indicates it doesn't appear there was any intellectual or cultural contact between east and west during this period, which goes back to my original question.
  • 2025: 50th anniversary of Franco's death...
    You criticize me for having the Inquisition and 'Islamic culture' in my history, yet you find it acceptable to have nuked Japan twice. Americans are very hard to understand...javi2541997

    I have had and will continue to say plenty of negative things about the US. And for what it's worth, Japan had about 2 million deaths in World War 2. China had 20 million at the hands of the Japanese.

    I did not intend to offend you.
  • 2025: 50th anniversary of Franco's death...
    to see if you had negative prejudices towards my country.javi2541997

    I acknowledge they are prejudices. I thought you wanted me to be honest and I tried to be without making myself look good.
  • 2025: 50th anniversary of Franco's death...
    Did you ever care about the death of Franco and then the born of democracy here?javi2541997

    Please forgive me for this. It’s from 1975.



    Franco was not well liked here in the US.

    As for Spain, like all good Americans, I don’t pay much attention to Europe. Spain has always struck me as a more rigid repressive society than other places in Europe. I think that’s partly because of its history of Islamic culture and partly because of Franco and Spanish Civil War. And then there is the Spanish inquisition, which none of us expect.

    People I know who’ve been to Spain loved it. The food is great, lots of interesting history, and beautiful cities, especially Barcelona. Over the last decade or so we’ve heard quite a bit about the troubles Spain has had as a member of the EU. That probably colors my attitude also. We also hear about how Spain is thought of as a cheap vacation spot. It is not given much respect in Europe.
  • Tao follows Nature
    Forgive me for this. I just remembered that I wrote a long discussion of Verse 25 a few years ago for a discussion group I was in. It includes several different translations as well as some commentary by others. This discussion is based on my own understanding of the text and is in no way authoritative. I put it in hide/reveal so people can disregard it if they aren't interested.

    Reveal
    Verse 25

    Stephen Mitchell

    There was something formless and perfect
    before the universe was born.
    It is serene. Empty.
    Solitary. Unchanging.
    Infinite. Eternally present.
    It is the mother of the universe.
    For lack of a better name,
    I call it the Tao.
    It flows through all things,
    inside and outside, and returns
    to the origin of all things.

    The Tao is great.
    The universe is great.
    Earth is great.
    Man is great.
    These are the four great powers.

    Man follows the earth.
    Earth follows the universe.
    The universe follows the Tao.
    The Tao follows only itself.

    Ellen Marie Chen

    There was something nebulous existing (yu wu hun ch’eng),
    Born before heaven and earth.
    Silent, empty,
    Standing alone (tu), altering not (pu kaki),
    Moving cyclically without becoming exhausted (pu tai),
    Which may be called the mother of all under heaven.
    I know not its name,
    I give its alias (tzu), Tao.
    If forced to picture it,
    I say it is “great” (ta).

    Therefore Tao is great,
    Heaven is great,
    Earth is great,
    The king is also great.
    In the realm there are four greats,
    And the king is one of them.
    Humans follow (fa) earth,
    Earth follows heaven,
    Heaven follows Tao,
    Tao follows self-becoming (tzu-jan).

    Ron Hogan

    Something perfect has existed forever,
    even longer than the universe.
    It's a vast, unchanging void.
    There's nothing else like it.
    It goes on forever and never stops.
    Everything else came from it.
    I don't know what else to call it
    So I'll call it Tao.
    What's it like?
    I can tell you this much: it's great.

    Something that great lasts.
    Something that lasts goes a long way.
    And something that goes a long way
    always comes back to the beginning.

    Tao's great.
    Heaven's great.
    Earth's great.
    And someone who's in touch with Tao is great, too.
    Those are the four greatest things in the universe
    and a Master is one of them.

    Someone who's in touch with Tao
    is in touch with the earth.
    The earth is in touch with heaven.
    Heaven's in touch with Tao.
    Tao's in touch with the way things are.

    I like this verse, at least the first stanza. I get a bit lost in the others, especially since some of the translations indicate that the other stanzas directly follow from the first. I don’t see the connection.

    I’ve included Ron Hogan’s interpretation, which I can’t decide if I like. This translation was suggested by ZzzoneiroCosm. It’s much more American and less poetic than any of the other translations. If I had read it first, I don’t know if I would have been attracted to the Tao Te Ching as much as I was.

    I’ve also included all of Lin Yutang’s selections from the Chuang Tzu, which I really like.

    Stanza 1 - Stephen Mitchell’s translation

    There was something formless and perfect
    before the universe was born.
    It is serene. Empty.
    Solitary. Unchanging.
    Infinite. Eternally present.
    It is the mother of the universe.
    For lack of a better name,
    I call it the Tao.
    It flows through all things,
    inside and outside, and returns
    to the origin of all things.

    As I noted, I like this stanza. It feels like a review section before the midterm exam for the verses covered so far. I especially like the discussion of how the Tao got its name. Turns out it was just made up because we couldn’t think of anything else to call it. It’s kind of a nickname. For me that answers the paradox of Verse 1, where Lao Tzu just jumps in without explanation and names the nameless.

    The subject of the cyclic return of the 10,000 things to the Tao is reiterated here. As I’ve noted in earlier posts, I struggled with this idea for a long time. Now, I see it as recognition that, while the Tao is separated into the 10,000 things by the act of naming, the 10,000 things are always returning to the Tao, i.e. that the act of creation didn’t happen 14 billion years ago, it’s always happening. It’s happening now. I think the idea of returning is one of those things that means different things depending on the situation.

    Stanzas 2 and 3 - Stephen Mitchell translation

    The Tao is great.
    The universe is great.
    Earth is great.
    Man is great.
    These are the four great powers.

    Man follows the earth.
    Earth follows the universe.
    The universe follows the Tao.
    The Tao follows only itself.

    These stanzas discuss what I have called a “ladder” in previous posts. There are a lot of different ladders in the Tao Te Ching and related documents. Here are a few examples:

    From Verse 42 - Stephen Mitchell

    The Tao gives birth to One.
    One gives birth to Two.
    Two gives birth to Three.
    Three gives birth to all things.

    From Verse 18 - Stephan Stenud

    When the great Tao is abandoned,
    Benevolence and righteousness arise.
    When wisdom and knowledge appear,
    Great pretense arises.
    When family ties are disturbed,
    Devoted children arise.
    When people are unsettled,
    Loyal ministers arise.

    From “The Great One Gives Birth to the Waters” - a text related to the Tao Te Ching. Very confusing.

    {The Great One} gave birth to Water. Water returned to assist (A) {The Great One}, [and] by means of this the Heavens were completed/manifested. The Heavens returned to assist {The Great One}, [and] by means of this the Earth was completed. The Heavens and Earth [returned to assist each other] [and] by means of this the Spirits and Luminaries were completed. The Spirits and Luminaries returned to assist each other, [and] by means of this Yin and Yang were completed. Yin and Yang returned to assist each other, [and] by means of this the Four Seasons were completed. The Four Seasons returned to assist each other (E), [and] by means of this Cold and Hot (F) were completed. Cold and Hot returned to assist each other, [and] by means of this Wet and Dry (G) were completed. Wet and Dry returned to assist each other, completing the Yearly Cycle (H) and that‘s all….

    In this verse, it seems as if Lao Tzu is working to connect the cosmic and the human. To show where we fit in.

    Man follows the earth.
    Earth follows the universe.
    The universe follows the Tao.
    The Tao follows only itself.

    In some of the translations, instead of “man” it says “the ruler,” which raises the question that comes up often - whether the Tao Te Ching is meant for all of us or just the bosses.

    Humanity, Earth, Heaven, and the Tao are called the four great powers. There is clearly a hierarchy with the Tao at the top.

    Lin Yutang’s commentary

    In this chapter, the working of the eternal principle of Tao and the silent revolutions of the heavenly bodies are seen as a model worthy of the imitation by man. It restates the argument that Tao should not be named, and if it is given a name, it is purely an exigency of human speech. It also states the principle of reversion of all things to their origin, a principle which makes creation and destruction different aspects of the same process.The universe is an orchestrated symphony, where human beings follow the laws of the land in which they live. At a level above this, the Earth follows the laws of astronomy - the rules that govern the motions of heavenly bodies. The cosmos in turn follow the patterns of the Tao at a macroscopic level. Ultimately, the Tao itself follows natural laws, which arise from the Tao process. This underscores the self-sufficiency and self-completeness of the Tao.

    Lin Yutang’s selections from the Chuang Tzu relevant to this verse

    The Chuang Tzu, also called the Zhuangzi, is the second foundational text of Taoism, written a couple of hundred years after the Tao Te Ching.

    25.1. THE MYSTERY OF THE UNIVERSE. Is the sky revolving around? Is the earth remaining still? Are the sun and the moon competing for their places? Who manages them? Who holds them in control? Who has nothing to do and is making these things move? Is it perhaps that there is a mechanism so that the heavenly bodies cannot help themselves? Is it perhaps that they continue to revolve and cannot stop themselves? Clouds become rain, and rain becomes clouds. Who makes them rise and come down? Who has nothing to do and is urging them to do so for his own pleasure? The wind rises from the north; it blows east and west, and there is a steady blow in the stratosphere. Who is sucking and blowing it alternately? Who has nothing to do and is shaking it about like this?

    Chuangtse does not answer the questions directly, but in the following paragraph speaks of these operations of nature in a description of what he calls the heavenly Tse-jan, lit. “self-so,” ”self-formed,” “‘that which is so by Itself.”

    THE IMITATION OF TAO which ends with a quotation from an old sacred song of Yu-yen (Shen-nung')
    .
    ''You listen and cannot hear Its voice, you look and cannot see its form. It fills the whole universe and encompasses the six points of space. You want to listen to it, and yet there is no point of
    Contact. See also the selection 6.i, 'The Silent, Beautiful
    Universe” "The heaven cannot help being high, the earth cannot
    help being wide. The sun and the moon cannot help going around, and all things of the creation cannot help but live and grow. Perhaps this is Tao.See the context in 4.1. "Existing before the heaven and earth, it is not regarded as long ago, being older than the primeval beginnings, it is not regarded as old.'

    25 2 TAO IS NAMED "GREAT.' THE ETERNAL CYCLES.

    "Can you then just call it Tao?” asked Little Knowledge."No, replied Taikung Tiao. 'We speak of The myriad things' of the creation, although we know that there are more than a myriad of them. Because the number is so great, we just call it 'myriad.' The heaven and earth are the great in form. The yin and yang are the great in force. Tao is great in both. We merely give it the name "Great” because of its greatness. But with a given name,
    it should not be compared with the names for other things. One cannot go on and argue that Tao is something by that name, as we say that dogs and horses are animals by those names. For that would be far off the mark.” 'Within the four points of the compass and above and how do the myriad things take their rise?” asked Little Knowledge. 'The yin and the yang principles act on one another, reflect one another and keep one another in place. The four seasons follow one another in succession, interrelated in their coming and going. Hence arise likes and
    dislikes, and choices and preferences.

    The male and the female mate and the race is continued. Peace and chaos follow one another; fortune breeds misfortune and vice versa. The slow and the quick rub against each other and things are formed and disperse. These are some of the things that we can say about material things and some of the subtle pnnciples that we can put down. All order is bom of a principle, and all rise and decay are interrelated. When something reaches a limit, then it reverses its direction; when the end is reached, the beginning begins. This is all that is evidenced by the material world, all that we know and all that we can say. And after all, our knowledge does not extend beyond the material universe. He who observes the working of Tao does not try to follow a thing to its very end, nor trace it to its very source. There all discussion ends.' (7:4)

    25.3. COMPIETE, ENTIRE AND ALL. The three. Complete, Entire and All differ in name, but are the same in reality. They all indicate the One. Once they roamed about together in the Palace of Nowhere. Did they get together to discuss things and never come to an end? Did they go about doing nothing together, and remain mellow and quiet, and indifferent and free? Did they
    get along well and spend their idle hours together? Free and unfettered is my mind, it reaches out and does not know where it reaches, it returns and does not know where it stops. My mind goes back and forth and does not know where it all ends. It loiters in the sphere of the Great Void, where the great Sage enters and does not know where it leads to. To realize that
    matter is matter is to reach the infinite with matter. Where matter is finite, it is the limitations of finite matter. The limit of the limitless is the limitlessness of the limited. To take the phenomena of rise and fall, growth and decay, it does not regard rise and fall as rise and fall, and it does not regard growth and decay as growth and decay. It does not regard beginning and
    end as beginning and end. It does not regard formation and dispersion as formation and dispersion. (6:3)

    Derek Lin’s commentary

    There is something that is formless, shapeless and non-physical, and yet also complete and perfect. Whatever it is, this "thing" existed before the universe came into being. How silent, tranquil and still! How ethereal, empty and boundless! It is completely independent and self-sufficient. Its nature is eternal and unchanging. Its functions circulate within every level of existence without ever stopping. Because it is the source of all creation, we can consider it to be the mother of all things. I do not know its name; I do not even know that it has a name. In order to identify it, I reluctantly call it the arbitrary name "Tao." If I were forced to describe it, I would have to say it is great beyond compare. Being great, it is always in a state of transition. Being perpetually in motion, it seems to recede far away from us. Being far away, it returns again to us. This great circle is the nature of Tao.

    Therefore, the Tao is great. Heaven and Earth, being manifestations of the Tao, are also great. A leader who manifests the Tao, and can serve as an example for the people, is also great. He or she occupies one of the four aspects of greatness.
  • Tao follows Nature
    Who is to say that the King is not instead Haile SelassieArcane Sandwich

    It is, or at least it was. "King" refers to temporal rulers in China, so in Ethiopia and elsewhere, it refers to whoever is in charge there. A lot of the Tao Te Ching is explicitly political.
  • Tao follows Nature
    Who says that it's just poetry? It can be science instead. Be cooperative, instead of intentionally trying to cause a disturbance in this Thread. I am the author of the OP and I am formally requesting you to be less disruptive. In other words, I'm giving you a "yellow card", a "warning", if you will.Arcane Sandwich

    As we've discussed elsewhere, I think it's reasonable for you to work to keep the discussion on track as laid out in the original post. On the other hand, I don't see what @Janus is doing as intentionally disruptive.
  • Tao follows Nature
    what does the following phrase mean: "The Tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao."Arcane Sandwich

    This is the heart of what Lao Tzu, Chuang Tzu, and others were trying to show us. The Tao is the primordial, undivided, unnamable reality. They call it "non-being." As I understand it it isn't even a thing. It doesn't exist until it's named and becomes "being." Being consists of the multiplicity of what we deal with on a daily basis. Horses, Danish pastry, electrons, Donald Trump Jr. They call it "the 10,000 things," which I love. That's @Janus's poetry. Not everyone sees it exactly this way.

    The idea of "naming" is central to Taoism and it's something I've wrestled with. Who does the naming? Naming is dividing, making distinctions, embossing the Tao with human concepts. Both the Tao and the 10,000 things are respected, but they are not the same thing. See what I said previously about returning.
  • Tao follows Nature
    It's about the fact that around 6th-3rd centuries B.C.E. a number of prophets and sages were active, including Pythagoras, Lao Tsu, the Buddha, and others, who set the wheels in motion for what were to become the great cultural formations of India, China and the West.Wayfarer

    I've always wondered about this. I don't think there was much contact between the east and west 2,500 years ago, so why this coincidence? Perhaps I'm wrong about cross-cultural communication back then.
  • Tao follows Nature

    I've never read the rubaiyat. I should. I've added it to my list.
  • When you love someone and give to them, should you expect something in return?
    It is my first OP, I would like any suggestions on making it better.Dmytro

    Welcome to the forum.

    The Lounge is where posts not really related to philosophy or science belong. Lounge posts don't show up on the front page. I think this thread belongs there. Also, a warning, the forum is a bad place to look for advice on personal issues. Many members are socially tone deaf.
  • Tao follows Nature
    The first stanza, in italics, is Edward FitzGerald's transmogrification of Omar Khayyam. The rest are my own, as extensions of the idea of The Eternal Saki.PoeticUniverse

    Thanks.
  • Tao follows Nature
    If everything that can be said misses the mark then there is no point discussing it. On the other hand how could you know if the mark has been missed if you don't know what it is?Janus

    The Tao Te Ching is philosophy, metaphysics. What is says is not literally true - as you say, poetry. If it doesn't work for you, that's no surprise. It doesn't work for lots of people. It works for me. When I first read it it grabbed me and pulled me in. In my understanding, many eastern philosophies, including Taoism, are about what goes on inside of us, not external reality. Self-awareness. I will say this - I'm an engineer and a pragmatist and I find the metaphysics of Taoism completely consistent with my understanding of science and reality.

    It seems to me that something that can only be apprehended non-linguistically cannot be spoken about except poetically or allusively. Poetry is always a matter of interpretation with no detreminate meaning, so there cannot be any detreminable "missing of the mark".Janus

    Yes. This is right.

    OK, so the translations contradict one another. How do you know which is correct, or considering what I said just above, how can there be a correct and incorrect at all?Janus

    It's true - the Tao Te Ching is not consistent within itself and there are more inconsistencies because it is thought to have been written by different authors over a long period of time - like the Bible. There are many different English translations which sometimes, often, contradict each other. Here's a link to dozens so you can get an idea of the multiplicity.

    https://terebess.hu/english/tao/_index.html

    I've read four or five of them and parts of many more. All of this together paints an impressionistic picture of what Lao Tzu is trying to show us. The inconsistencies are, as they say, a feature, not a bug, starting with the first verse - The Tao that can be spoken is not the eternal Tao.

    Are you invoking the phenomenon/ noumenon distinction?Janus

    It's a similar concept - different in detail and context.

    If you don't understand the language the text was written in, how do you know that the translator avoids a mistake?Janus

    You don't know German, Latin, or ancient Greek (I assume) but you can still understand Kant, Thomas Aquinas, and Aristotle.
  • Tao follows Nature
    The Permanent Quantum 'Vacuum' Tao rearranges into the temporaries which may persist somewhat until they unarrange and perish, the Tao ever remaining as itself, before, during, and after, as the temporaries are not new substance but directly the Tao quantum fields.PoeticUniverse

    I'm not sure if you are referring to the Tao as literally the quantum vacuum or as a metaphor. I think taking it literally is mixing up metaphysics and physics.

    What is the source of the poem you included. Is it your own? What can you tell us about it?
  • Tao follows Nature

    I forgot - the translation you provided is by Gia-Fu Feng. If I remember correctly, Jane English provided the photographs in the book they wrote together. If I weren't so lazy I would go check on that.
  • Tao follows Nature
    Something mysteriously formed,
    Born before heaven and Earth.
    In the silence and the void,
    Standing alone and unchanging,
    Ever present and in motion.
    Perhaps it is the mother of ten thousand things.
    I do not know its name
    Call it Tao.
    For lack of a better word, I call it great.
    Lao Tzu (Laozi)

    I think this is a pretty straightforward summary of the Taoist cosmology.

    Being great, it flows
    It flows far away.
    Having gone far, it returns.
    Lao Tzu (Laozi)

    This is something I've thought about a lot - the idea of returning. This is how I think of it now - The Tao gives rise to the 10,000 things, which then returns to the Tao. That means that this process is taking place continuously and continually. The Tao didn't give rise to the multiplicity of the world once, it does it over and over. It's always doing it. I haven't heard that interpretation elsewhere, so I don't know if others would agree with it.

    Therefore, "Tao is great;
    Heaven is great;
    Earth is great;
    The king is also great."
    These are the four great powers of the universe,
    And the king is one of them.

    Man follows Earth.
    Earth follows heaven.
    Heaven follows the Tao.
    Tao follows what is natural.
    Lao Tzu (Laozi)

    I'm always confused by "Heaven" and "Earth." Sometimes they mean sky and ground; sometimes the home of spirit and of humanity; sometimes yin and yang; sometimes light and dark. I see this as one depiction of the hierarchy of steps between the Tao and the king or humankind. It is presented in different steps in some other verses. As with many other elements in Taoist philosophy, it doesn't make sense to try to attach a specific definition to it. I see it as an impressionistic painting of how the world works. Just sort of soak in it.

    As for "Tao follows what is natural," I'm not sure exactly what Lao Tzu is trying to tell us. I don't see as much significance in it as you do. I haven't sat down and really focused on the different verses in a long time. I probably should.
  • Is China really willing to start a war with Taiwan in order to make it part of China?
    It's understandable, given the nature of incomplete information relative to a situation that involves us.Arcane Sandwich

    It's not primarily incomplete information. The best informed of us don't know what's going to happen and to get to the position of being a decision maker in these situations you have to have bought into your country's nationalistic ideology.
  • Is China really willing to start a war with Taiwan in order to make it part of China?
    And, like any guess, it could turn out to be wrong. And in fact it has, many times.Arcane Sandwich

    I find I am almost always wrong when I try to predict what will happen next in politics or foreign affairs. The lesson I take from that is not to do much, which may be a brilliant strategy or a highway to hell.
  • Is China really willing to start a war with Taiwan in order to make it part of China?
    I think the more germaine question is: Will the US abandon Ukraine (& Eastern Europe) to Russian aggression and thereby give the PRC a green light to invade Taiwan without starting a wider (or world) war? :brow:180 Proof

    I think the most germane question is "What could possibly go wrong?" The US doesn't seem to have a good record of figuring that out in recent decades. Maybe no one has.
  • Is China really willing to start a war with Taiwan in order to make it part of China?
    Taiwan produces around 90% of the world's most advanced ICs. It is very much in the iinterest of the US and other countries that such manufacturing capabilities are not taken over by China.wonderer1

    Hey, no fair knowing more than I do. But still, I'm not sure that's a good enough reason to go to war with China. Will China having control of Taiwanese chip manufacturers be more disruptive than a war with the US's active participation? I don't think they have any more interest in the world economy falling apart than we do.

    I've changed my mind - I'm pretty sure it's not a good enough reason.