Here's another one:

What happens when a double agent becomes a triple agent?

Let me offer another hint...

"A more perfect union"...

How else can that be stated by the Eye of Providence?

Keep on trying. Last poast was interesting.

Still not the answer.

A pragmatic presupposition, really.

There is far too much for an-all seeing eye to see. — Nils Loc

But when it looks at itself inwardly what do you think happens?

Probably, but not the answer.

Do other people's experience (being) in the world consitute a single possible world apart from others, or do we all live in one world? — Nils Loc

Both.

More like the one on the back of the dollar bill.

:sparkle:

Well...you may not be bored...but for certain you are not telling it as a fact. — Frank Apisa

I am telling it as certain as being a solipsist.

No, I am just telling it as a fact.

Thats not an explanation, nor in any way demonstrative of your claim. — DingoJones

Whereof one cannot speak thereof one ought remain silent^.

Why, because it is(?)

No, you are the one making a claim, its up to you to demonstrate why your claim is true or why we should accept that its true. — DingoJones

But, the claim is true.

Are you Kevin Langdon?

The end-state is not pre-determined. — Gnomon

And what would it take for that to be true?

Think solipsism...

The EnFormAction Hypothesis : http://bothandblog3.enformationism.info/page23.html — Gnomon

In a non-deterministic universe that would all be true. But, this isn't a non-deterministic universe, is it?

PS__I have an information-based theory of state transformations (novel state spaces) in the real world. But it's probably not detailed enough for your needs. — Gnomon

Please share that too.

What prompted such a question? — Gnomon

I'll send you a PM.

Here's something to read about:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parapsychology#Stargate_Project

It's real, though...

I'm into Information theory, but I don't understand the question. — Gnomon

Well, the question is pretty straightforward. If the universe is expanding, then new state spaces are arising and hence information.

I guess the question is whether the universe expands or contracts more rapidly in our universe as opposed to some other one?

Take some Xanax and/or Haldol.

So, Trump is committed to bombing Iranian cultural sites which leads to undeniable proof of committing preemptively war crimes.

Wow...

Hey, ssu... is the state of affairs beyond recourse or is there some logic behind this?

I’m not too sure, to tell you the truth. — NOS4A2

Now you can be sure.

I’m not too sure, to tell you the truth. — NOS4A2

Truth is, Trump desecrated many years of effort by Obama's administration to convince Iran not to pursue nuclear capability. Quite sad, I think.

Well, didn't Iran give up its nuclear program with the help of Obama's promise of funds and technology regarding nuclear reactors, with Russia supporting this effort by enriching Iran's uranium reserves and sending it back to Iran to be used as fuel for nuclear reactors?

The more irrational you behave, the greater you effectiveness of destruction in a war scenario.

Thing is, in this case the decision seems entirely irrational, and that's scary.

It happened again, and not in some psychotic fit as I first suspected. I really want to understand this, can someone chime in?

I sort of analyzed the issue, and typically, when these sort of things happen, you have massive deflationary spirals arising due to the newfound output at such a lower cost.

The automatic assumption is to assume, the owner of the robot will charge more; but, he or she can only charge as much as it will cost him or her to supply the goods that he or she provides.

And pigs can fly.

So, Trump just got impeached?

2. Type 2 contradiction literally means whatever belief system you're operating from is logically flawed because it's impossible for all the statements that constitute it to be true at the same time. For instance imagine a belief system X composed of statements A, B, and C. If A, B and C are inconsistent with each other the conjunction A & B & C always evaluates to false, is a contradiction of type 2, which means X on the whole is a false belief system. Naturally, we have to discard X. — TheMadFool

Then, how do you correct a faulty belief system, or how do you create one where these contradictions don't arise?

Well, if I'm in contradiction then it matters if it's about something factual (hence correspondence with respect to the world) or it may be about something that's truth is more malleable or subject to change, like values?

Do facts factor in here?

For some reason the correspondence theory of truth deserves a mention of it's 'bout facts.

But what about values?

With regards to what?

The problem with values and value systems is that they are often internally contradictory. — NOS4A2

How so?

But, what of differing or clashing values that don't correspond with any particular state of affairs in the world, necessarily?