• Art Created by Artificial Intelligence


    I’m not referring to pop art. I mean what I said, art that is cheap and produced in mass. There will always be a place (market) for it in a capitalist/materialist society. AI just makes production more efficient. The fact is that modern society (all of us) loves efficiency and predictability.
  • Art Created by Artificial Intelligence
    Reading through this topic you might think there was no such thing as cheap mass produced art before AI came along. :lol:
  • Art Created by Artificial Intelligence
    It’s not much of a threat to graphic design yet, even for low-end work. It’s output if far too generic and it can’t really do typography. That may change in the near future though. Currently the worst hit must be to stock photography and illustration. Last week I used Midjourney for a bunch of magazine ads instead of stock images. It’s cheaper, and it’s a lot quicker and more convenient to type some prompts than doing image searches and reviewing hundreds of images.
  • Art Created by Artificial Intelligence


    Midjourney AI. It has a feature where you can upload an image and the AI will generate a prompt from it. In this case it generated the prompt: A painting of trees by tim liu, in the style of california plein air, vibrant color fields, gari melchers, light brown and purple, bold colors, strong lines, dramatic skies, jeff danziger --ar 5:4

    I used that prompt to generate the image above.

    For what it's worth, it looks like a lot of the stuff on Midjourney.T Clark

    Good guess. :smirk:
  • Art Created by Artificial Intelligence
    What is important is not what we find, but what we are looking for.Angelo Cannata

    I'm looking for an aesthetic experience. Technically that can be found anywhere and anytime, though it's usually much easier to find in art, who or whatever produces it.
  • Currently Reading
    Finished 1Q84 by Haruki Murakami. I liked it. Always been a sucker for a drawn-out love story. Only skipped a bit toward the end. Could have skipped a lot because so much is drawn out and recounted but for some reason I just like his writing. About halfway through I read 1984 because it was mentioned a few times in the story and I thought it might deepen the aesthetic or offer some insight. Not necessary, I think.
  • Art Created by Artificial Intelligence
    No pornography, although a bare breast from time to time. I don’t know whether this is because the program has limits built in or if sexually explicit images are not selected.T Clark

    It claims to be a PG-13 rating but I would class it at G. For example, if you make a prompt for Michelangelo's Statue of David it will only produce ones fully clothed. If you specify 'nude' it will refuse.

    I can certainly see why it frightens graphic artists.T Clark

    :snicker: Yes it puts another dent in the industry, but we're accustomed to taking hits. Outsourcing, online templates, crowdsourcing... the devaluation is endless, or rather it's getting much closer to the end. I adopted it right away and it's a useful tool for GD, also for generating subject matter to paint. I prefer to paint from life but having any image that you can instantly generate and view from a monitor is very very handy. It takes time and effort to set up a still-life or find a good landscape or seascape.
  • To be an atheist, but not a materialist, is completely reasonable
    I am running out of time and this might not help but logos is universal law. It happens this way because that is how the laws of the universe make it. This can be completely mechanical. Creativity can try new things and if the new thing isn't compatible it becomes extinct. We can call that chaos but we don't have to judge it as a bad thing. However, I am fascinated by the Egyptian and Aztec efforts to use math to understand the order of things and live in harmony with that order.Athena

    God is both logos and pathos, or rather, order and chaos then? When you have time.
  • To be an atheist, but not a materialist, is completely reasonable
    The way to apply science to superstitious notions is to think in terms of a prime mover, logos, universal laws, and nature.Athena

    There isn't a way to apply science to superstitious notions because, if for no other reason, they cannot be measured in any way. Ghosts cannot be measured, for instance. I suppose that neural pathways could be measured and that could prove the existence of such notions, but no one is denying that such notions exist.

    Anyway, there's something that bothers me about your idea of God. You seem to basically be saying that God is order (logos) and nature. The thing that doesn't make sense to me is that nature is order AND chaos, so if God is nature then God is both order and chaos. To put it in Nietzschean terms, God is both the Apollonian (similar to logos) and the Dionysian (similar to pathos). If God is only logos then what is pathos? The devil? :naughty:
  • Culture is critical
    I think anyone who is excessively wealthy must be scrutinised by that domain. That is my version of 'big brother is watching you.' Big brother would become a label for the mass of the population of the planet. This is the way a good 'big brother,' was always supposed to be, in a human family. A guy who helped protect the family from nefarious b*******.universeness

    I think if Orwell could have imagined an artificial general intelligence in 1949 his book 1984 would have been a bit different. Can you imagine the power of media manipulation and surveillance it could have? We appear to be rapidly approaching AGI and those who develop it, the excessively wealthy, will be in control.
  • Culture is critical
    What was the point?Vera Mont

    This...
    I think the bottom line here is that sapiens are not rational beings and therefore suggesting that morality is essentially rational, that it "is a matter of cause & effect" is false and misguided. Morality involves personal and shared values, identity, and intuitions that we may not even be consciously aware of.praxis
  • Culture is critical


    I’m pro-choice, by the way, in case that wasn’t clear and it matters at all, and I wasn’t arguing for or against abortion because that wasn’t the point.
  • Culture is critical
    Fine. I didn't say a word about morality. But now it's here...Vera Mont

    It was there from the start. It was the entire focus, actually, and abortion was merely an example. I could have used many other examples. I guess it was too good an example, you getting so caught up in it that the point was lost.
  • To be an atheist, but not a materialist, is completely reasonable
    God is a manifestation of thought - meaning we think it and it becomes a shared notion. Atheists can not argue against the existence of God without sharing the same notion of a God that they argue does not exist.Athena

    The basic difference is that believers are 'bonded' in their shared belief system, which isn't necessarily a bad thing. Atheists may be somewhat bonded in their shared beliefs but it barely compares with religious adherence. There may be authority figures for atheists, such as Dawkins or whoever, but they're not regarded as ultimate authorities who have special insight into the nature of reality. What they know anyone can know. Nothing needs to be taken on faith. This is a significant difference. There are other important differences that I won't bother to go into at this point.

    By a nonhuman god, I mean the prime mover and logos, reason, the controlling force of the universe. The gods that are worshipped are made in the image of man. That is not so for the prime mover or logos. I do not mean a jealous, revengeful, punishing God is an inhuman God. :lol:Athena

    I know what you meant. I just couldn't resist the irony. Nature is infinitely more cruel than any human could be. :smirk:

    Abrahamic religions most certainly do not have a concept that would lead to scientific thinking. they do not have a concept of a Prime Mover or logos. Their brains have zero thought patterns for thinking in such terms.Athena

    You're quite wrong about this. Most scientific and technical innovations prior to the scientific revolution were achieved by societies organized by religious traditions. Ancient pagan, Islamic, and Christian scholars pioneered individual elements of the scientific method. Historically, Christianity has been and still is a patron of sciences.

    They [atheists] shot themselves in the foot by refusing to use the word "God". That just proves all the religious people right because the Bible says there will be people who reject God and they are "evil" and reality is a fight of good over evil, and we are on the damn merry-go-round of arguing about God and no one can get off it.Athena

    Religions deliberatly use heratics (e.g., "the Bible says there will be people who reject God and they are evil") to shore up group identity by defining what they are not. It is a very effective tactic and that's why it is so widely used. Indeed, it's such an effective tactic that no one can get off it.

    You just threw the prime mover and logos out the window and destroyed the reasoning of democracy. Can we discover the laws of the universe and base our laws on such knowledge? Isn't that fundamental to democracy?Athena

    I have no idea of what you're talking about here.

    I suggest that you seriously consider what the actual purpose of religion is and why it exists. Also, consider if there's a difference between spirituality and religion.
  • Culture is critical
    Of course they do! Lots of women who can't give birth adopt babies from women who could and didn't want to, or children taken away from parents who could not or would not adequately rise to parenthood, or import one from a country too poor to care for all of its children, or commission a surrogate or buy one on the black market. All those children are available and negotiable.Vera Mont

    We seem to have lost the plot here so I will ignore this part.

    I will say now that forcing parenthood on the unwilling will always have bad consequences, especially for the unwanted child.Vera Mont

    Really? You can't even imagine parents who were initially unwilling but ended up with a good outcome for themselves and their initially unwanted child??? Personally, my wife and I chose not to have children but I can imagine that if we were unable to avoid it things could have turned out well.

    I did not identify the birth as the cause of a bad result, but rather the forcing of a child on unwilling parent(s).Vera Mont

    That doesn't dismiss the question in any way. Forcing parenthood is only one cause out of literally countless causes that could be identified for a bad result.

    I think the bottom line here is that sapiens are not rational beings and therefore suggesting that morality is essentially rational, that it "is a matter of cause & effect" is false and misguided. Morality involves personal and shared values, identity, and intuitions that we may not even be consciously aware of.
  • Culture is critical
    Unwilling is not the same as unable.Vera Mont

    There would seem to be no moral issue for women who are unable to give birth, given that there's no choice in the matter.

    Yes, some able but unwilling parents have 'risen to the occasion' in some ways. Usually by giving up what they wanted to do with their own lives for what they needed to to do for the child. However, many more able but unwilling parents either attempted to rise to the occasion and failed, having to give child up, willingly or more often by force, and some end up hurting or killing the child while some raise the child so badly that he or she becomes another liability to society. Overall, not a happy outcome for the people involved or for society.Vera Mont

    You seem to be suggesting that forcing birth, or rather that making abortion illegal is immoral because in some cases it may result in bad consequences. Why are you identifying giving birth as the cause of the bad result? It would seem more reasonable to identify the raising of the child "so badly" as the cause of the bad result.

    Moral, is not a matter of cause and effect. It's a matter of intuition and culture, to put it broadly. It involves reason of course, though I don't know if it can be said to be rational, not strickly rational anyway.
  • Would a purely hedonistic society be a destructive one ?
    When we say ... that pleasure is the end and aim, we do not mean the pleasures of the prodigal or the pleasures of sensuality, as we are understood to do by some through ignorance, prejudice or wilful misrepresentation. By pleasure we mean the absence of pain in the body and of trouble in the soul. It is not by an unbroken succession of drinking bouts and of revelry, not by sexual lust, nor the enjoyment of fish and other delicacies of a luxurious table, which produce a pleasant life; it is sober reasoning, searching out the grounds of every choice and avoidance, and banishing those beliefs through which the greatest tumults take possession of the soul.Epicurus
  • Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)
    I understand that maybe some of you do not understand why we care if we are not Americans. Well, I want to highlight my words again: The USA has a big impact on the world and this is why we are interested. My participation in this thread is not with bad faith nor silliness. And, if you do not mind, I will keep in touch on this topic, and see how this matter ends up. Respecting your nation, of course!javi2541997

    I did not mean to suggest in any way your participation in this topic is inappropriate or whatever. Honestly, I value the perspective of people from other countries, and there is certainly no need to show respect for America on my account.

    I often feel a little embarrassed by how little I follow the politics of other countries when the world seems to pay so much attention to American politics.
  • Culture is critical
    If she does not want to be a mother and/or does not have the ability to provide for the child, the effect of her pregnancy will not be good.Athena

    Unwilling parents have been known to rise to the occasion and a child add much to their lives, so the overall effect could turn out to be good in many cases, in which case your cause-and-effect moral theory doesn't pan-out so well.
  • Walking & Thinking
    Wow— very well thought out and elaborate. Thanks Praxis!Mikie

    My personal assistant (ChatGPT) should actually be thanked for all the thinking and elaboration. :snicker:
  • Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)
    One of the main interesting things about this amazing debate we are having, is that you folks are given for granted that I root for Republicans when I am not even American.javi2541997

    I know you're not American. This is a discussion about American politics, or rather, a discussion about an American politician, so of course it will default to that. I know practically nothing about the current politics in Spain although I know there is a general distinction between socialism and conservatism. I would be surprised, actually, if you were a Trump supporter, even though Trump is very anti-socialist.

    Why did they have such confidence in this system when it is clear that it is flawed?javi2541997

    It's not at all clear that American mail-in voting is significantly flawed. Have you in any way shown that it is?
  • To be an atheist, but not a materialist, is completely reasonable
    I am sorry, I do not follow what you are saying. You are saying "no" to what?Athena

    I pointed out that a religion is not "as we make it". It's highly dogmatic by nature, in other words, and when revisions are made it's by religious leaders. Followers are not free to make up their own beliefs and promote them within a religion. That would be considered heretical.

    Even atheists are sure what a god is and it is not possible to discuss logos and the prime mover with them because they absolutely can not give up their understanding of a humanized god.Athena

    I'm aware of various of conceptions of God, some very unlike the one depicted in the Bible. I see no reason why an atheist would be unable to consider an inhuman God. Indeed, the God depicted in the Bible strikes me as extremely inhuman.

    Also, religions don't all agree on logos and the prime mover. There is no prime mover in Buddhism, for instance, and they'd consider the dualism inherent in logos an expression of ignorance.

    They absolutely insist all discussions of god match the Christian notion of a god and therefore it is impossible to discuss a notion of god as forces of nature with no human qualities.Athena

    It doesn't make any sense to me why an atheist would be unable to discuss the notion of god as a force of nature with no human qualities. BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY, I was responding to your claim about a religion. Of course, individuals can have their own spiritual experiences and beliefs.

    Democracy can be a religion.Athena

    No, that would be a Theocracy.

    Anyone who does not hold our understanding of truth is an idiot, right?Athena

    Within religion, anyone who does not hold the "understanding" of Truth is considered to have no faith. I use scare quotes because no religion has understandable truths, by design. Ultimate truth requires ultimate authority, ensuring a hierarchy of leaders (who have special access to ultimate truth) and followers.
  • Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)


    I don't know about Spain (and I can't read Spanish) but the US postal service is quite reliable.

    Regarding rejected votes due to human errors in mail-in voting, as well as mail-in votes lost in the mail, both would seems to favor Republicans.

    PP_2020.11.20_post-election_3-01.png?resize=310,353
  • Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)
    Why do I have to believe in the mail voting system?javi2541997

    Why would someone not believe in mail-in voting? Hopefully because there is evidence that shows it’s unreliable and not because a politician says it’s unreliable.

    Btw, if voting systems are prone to fraud, how do we know that only democrats abuse it? Maybe the cheaters are republicans.
  • Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)


    From what I know of Spanish history I would expect socialism to be less popular there than in the States. Actually I have that backwards, Franco was conservative.
  • Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)
    2) the "mob" (as flannel jesus says) tend to be more active in the right, because, believe it or not, these voters tend to have more confidence in the state. Meanwhile, leftists just do not go to vote because it is an act "against the system".javi2541997

    Socialists are usually accused of having too much confidence in the state and left to their own devices they’d walk wide-eyed into an Orwellian dystopia. On the other hand, American conservatives tend to believe that the state is inherently incompetent and corrupt and that’s the justification for wanting it to be as small as possible.

    people vote left because they are fearful.javi2541997

    In America right-wing politicians tend to use fear tactics. Just look at Trump for example.
  • Walking & Thinking
    Kant was a walker.

    I usually walk the dog two miles a day and do think it helps thinking because…

    • Increased Blood Flow: Walking gets your blood pumping, including blood flow to the brain. This enhanced circulation ensures that your brain receives more oxygen and nutrients, which can improve cognitive function.
    • Stress Reduction: Walking can help reduce stress and anxiety levels. When you're less stressed, your mind can focus better and think more clearly. The rhythmic and repetitive nature of walking can also have a calming effect on the mind.
    • Creative Thinking: Many people find that walking helps stimulate creative thinking. The combination of physical activity and being outdoors (if you're walking outdoors) can provide a change of scenery and break from routine, which can boost creativity and problem-solving abilities.
    • Mindfulness and Reflection: Walking can serve as a form of mindfulness or meditation. As you walk, you may become more aware of your surroundings and your thoughts. This mindfulness can lead to increased self-reflection and a deeper understanding of your thoughts and ideas.
    • Enhanced Connectivity: Walking can foster connectivity between different regions of the brain. Researchers have found that it can improve the connectivity of the default mode network (DMN), which is associated with introspection, daydreaming, and creative thinking.
    • Break from Screen Time: In our increasingly digital world, taking a break from screens and technology by going for a walk can be refreshing. This screen-free time allows your brain to relax and recharge, potentially leading to improved cognitive performance afterward.
    • Mood Enhancement: Physical activity, including walking, can release endorphins, which are natural mood lifters. A better mood can lead to clearer thinking and improved decision-making.
    • Problem Solving: Walking can provide a conducive environment for problem-solving. As you walk, you can mull over challenges and come up with creative solutions. The rhythmic motion of walking can help your mind process information and generate ideas.
    • Increased Dopamine Release: Walking can lead to the release of dopamine, a neurotransmitter associated with reward and motivation. This can make you feel more alert and motivated to engage in mental tasks.
    • Improved Memory: Some studies suggest that physical activity, including walking, may improve memory and cognitive function, particularly in older adults.
  • Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)


    From his position as president Trump did spent months insisting that mail ballots were a Democratic plot and the election would be “rigged.” We all witnessed that.

    Without trying to check it’s easy to think that Trump’s henchmen at the state level sought to block mail-in ballots, while his lawyers brought dozens of spurious suits to make it more difficult to vote–an intensification of the GOP’s legacy of suppressive tactics.

    I don’t know how true it is that Trump plotted to block a legitimate vote count before the election, but it wouldn’t surprise me.

    Of course we all witnessed Trump spending the months following Nov. 3 trying to steal the election he’d lost–with lawsuits and conspiracy theories, pressure on state and local officials, and finally summoning his army of supporters to the Jan. 6 rally that ended in deadly violence at the Capitol.

    Of course, it all favored one candidate, and that candidate was Trump himself.

    This is what NOS considers rigging an election. I guess he counts this as another Trump failure.
  • Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)
    I’m saying it’s propaganda, written by Nancy Pelosi’s biographer, no less.NOS4A2

    According to your understanding of election rigging, the article describes both sides as guilty of it, so how could it be considered propaganda if it doesn’t favor one side or the other?
  • Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)
    You’re simply repeating the propaganda, while avoiding their admission.NOS4A2

    So you’re claiming that the portion of the article describing Trump’s efforts to rig the election is false?
  • Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)
    I’m arguing the election was rigged. Everything from changing election laws behind the backs of Americans, flooding the system with dark money, threatening riots should they lose, suppressing and controlling information…it’s all thereNOS4A2

    “The President [Trump] spent months insisting that mail ballots were a Democratic plot and the election would be “rigged.” His henchmen at the state level sought to block their use, while his lawyers brought dozens of spurious suits to make it more difficult to vote–an intensification of the GOP’s legacy of suppressive tactics. Before the election, Trump plotted to block a legitimate vote count. And he spent the months following Nov. 3 trying to steal the election he’d lost–with lawsuits and conspiracy theories, pressure on state and local officials, and finally summoning his army of supporters to the Jan. 6 rally that ended in deadly violence at the Capitol.”

    Your argument seems to include that Trump attempted to rig the election from his position as president and, like so many other failures, he bungled it.
  • Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)
    A glittering generality or two and praxis is persuaded.NOS4A2

    Persuaded to what? You’re the one pointing to the article as truth.
  • Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)
    There was “a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information”. This is according to their own admission.NOS4A2

    That’s why the participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream–a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it. And they believe the public needs to understand the system’s fragility in order to ensure that democracy in America endures.

    Also:
    Trump and his allies were running their own campaign to spoil the election. The President spent months insisting that mail ballots were a Democratic plot and the election would be “rigged.” His henchmen at the state level sought to block their use, while his lawyers brought dozens of spurious suits to make it more difficult to vote–an intensification of the GOP’s legacy of suppressive tactics. Before the election, Trump plotted to block a legitimate vote count. And he spent the months following Nov. 3 trying to steal the election he’d lost–with lawsuits and conspiracy theories, pressure on state and local officials, and finally summoning his army of supporters to the Jan. 6 rally that ended in deadly violence at the Capitol.

    Of course, these efforts all favored one candidate.
  • A List of Intense Annoyances
    Who: They are the modern aristocracy.Vera Mont

    I think their best trick is brainwashing you into believing that people like Jeff Bezos are nobility. They have money and the power and influence that comes with money, that is all.

    subliminal messagesVera Mont

    Tinfoil hats effectively block these messages, as I’m sure you’re aware.
  • Donald Trump (All General Trump Conversations Here)
    And when the vote was challenged, not a single mainstream media outlet wanted the ratings bonanza of turning it into a scandal.yebiga

    It’s been a scandal since day one, what are you talking about?
  • A List of Intense Annoyances


    If you believe that can you explain how they do it? And who are they?
  • A List of Intense Annoyances
    Referring to pure fiction, like Orwellian Newspeak, as though it were something real.

    I just finished reading 1984 and according to the story, words that imply individuality, rebellion, or independent thought are systematically eliminated. The word "impact" would not exist at all in Newspeak because it can convey a sense of influence, significance, or change, which could be seen as promoting independent thought or analysis. Words like "impact" would be replaced with more simplified or controlled language that serves the purposes of the Party and reduces the potential for dissent.

    The point is to control thought, not to degrade language.
  • Culture is critical
    From the last page alone: praxis @universeness @Vera Mont @180 Proof
    How would you describe this thread?
    Amity

    The phrase "hot mess" comes to mind.

    Is it only a 'chat' or is there more to it?Amity

    I'd say there's more to it than mere blather.

    Has it touched on philosophy?Amity

    Not that I've noticed but I haven't read all of it.

    How valuable have the exchanges been?Amity

    Generally good though there are some odd ideas being bounced around.

    What ideas/posts have made you think?Amity

    This:
    Moral, is a matter of cause and effect. When the consequences are good it is moral. If the consequences are bad it is immoral. — Athena

    How would this understanding apply to something like abortion? I think that for any normal person abortion 'feels' wrong, so one consequence of it is a bad feeling. That indicates that it's immoral, according to the cause & effect view. On the other hand, studies indicate that legalizing abortion reduces crime/poverty, a good consequence.

    Things become less clear when it comes to personal rights, authority, and tradition. The values that shape our personal and social identities often disagree on the consequences of abortion.

    Would it be out of place in the main area?Amity

    It was in place there for months, if I'm not mistaken. In any case, the topic seems to have only three major contributors and moving it to the lounge section didn't seem to bother them at all.
  • Currently Reading
    time to make a break from Japanese folksjavi2541997

    I’m in the middle of 1Q84. It's quite a long book, almost as long as War & Peace. Consistently good though, like every other Murakami book that I've read, which so far includes The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle, Kafka on the Shore, Killing Commendatore, and What I Talk about When I Talk about Running.

    I was only a little disappointed with Kafka on the Shore because it seemed almost geared towards an adolescent audience.

    Looking forward to his new book coming out in English.