We believe we see politicians do certain things, and hear them say certain things, but then we discover they did, and said, something entirely different. Some of them are really good at it, and charge a lot of money to see their act. Should we applaud, or re-elect?

isn't that saying something about the people believing it rather than politicians,etc them actually being experts?

Some want to learn, some want to teach, some want to do both.

what do you think it would take to make mental health be taken more seriously?

Public affairs ,I assume public mental health should be more important than it is?

shouldn't they be prepared for such things?

reread what? You keep editing

I'm gonna go to sleep good night.

where does my knowledge come from if I haven't read any philosophy
Is it all a coincidence, is there any truth in what I speak?

your right, to bad I have had enough coincidences to understand everything that's been discussed so far.

I can prove its a coincidence I was just reading a web novel and stumbled across a quote webnovel com witcher of serpents and blood chapter 2 at the very top.
I guess fates on my side

His (Nietzsche's) book, Beyond Good and Evil , really aims at changing the reader's opinion as to what is good and what is evil
— Bertrand Russell
I guess Nietzsches book was so good that it made him doubt himself?
I wouldn't know since I've never read a book on philosophy in my entire life.

If truth can be achieved at all, it can come only from an individual who purposefully disregards everything that is traditionally taken to be "important.
Nietzsche
Says create your own
It's just a coincidence we have the same philosophy
Nobody has a monopoly on philosophy

I didn't try to convince people to change whats good and evil

Nietzsche insists that there are no rules for human life, no absolute values, no certainties on which to rely. If truth can be achieved at all, it can come only from an individual who purposefully disregards everything that is traditionally taken to be "important."
The snake which cannot shed its skin, must die. That's according to the German philosopher, Friedrich Nietzsche. Writing in 1881, Nietzsche wasn't concerned with snakes, but he was making a point about the ability to change. Or rather that those who refuse to adapt are resisting the inevitability of change.

striving to be amoral will make myself have peace
It's impossible to give peace to others unless they seek it for themself

I don't pretend to care, I pretend to not care
As for stoic I can never be happy with what I have

using amorality to dampen my emotions enough to feel peaceful?

why would I be unconscious?

feeling guilty is the first steps to understanding

i dont want to reduce my conscious
I can't help everyone

No, you can't--BECAUSE good people are capable of doing bad things, and conversely, bad people are capable of doing good things.

I'm not denying that that's why I said I can only trust that I'll do the right thing.

iv been pretending for years it's not easy to lose understanding of others misery.

seeing what other people see as good or bad,for better understanding of others and my self , i never said I was amoral but striving to be might be beneficial.

?
People who pretend to be good are good?
I can't make safe people who don't wish for safety

I still feel other people's misery ,
But I would still pretend I dont.
Otherwise I would never feel peace

you cant be amoral if your dead?
a·mor·al
/āˈmôrəl/
adjective
lacking a moral sense; unconcerned with the rightness or wrongness of something.

Understanding others is what keeps me safe
Listening to others doesn't keep me safe
Empathy isn't moral

You can be amoral and empathetic at the same time no?
And when you oppose people's morals your evil no?
When I do something why does it have to be good or evil?
Can I just trust that if I'm a good person I'll be a good person
and if I'm a bad person I'm a bad person?

if your evil you don't have to worry about good or bad
It's more peaceful to be evil
I suppose amoral is a better word

Being evil doesn't mean your lacking empathy

other than being safe is there anything else to life?

your life could be ruined in a few words

as long as I'm safe I don't mind sleeping all day

Your evil when you oppose people but not when your openly evil.

so you don't have to worry about losing things when people say your evil if your actually evil.

I don't think you can freely will anything
To freely will you need to not be restricted by anything.

are mental/internal choices hardwired?
Why aren't people born knowing everything?
Why would nature not abuse such a thing?
Is knowing nothing better than knowing something?

Why not let people who want to fight to the death fight to the death?

even if you had infinite resources, would there be a social structure capable of catering to everyone?

Are choices already in your head, do you actually contribute anything to them,
Are you just observing choices that are already made?