Music is like Man, and Man is like the Ego. Both are complexities of their self-starting points, which develop their own subjective individual existence.

Music is for Man, as humanity had been for God - in any and all religions - understand "God" as the "Divine" -. Music is existence itself and its epicenter for everything that emanates from itself - its "Melodies", its "Outros", its "Chorus", and its "Riffs", which live through their own creation.

Of the most complex sonorities, in which are found the most simple and complex aspects, rich and poor, cold and hot, its own Universe is experienced and made to be witnessed, which, by means of such characteristics, are also necessarily finite and doomed to an end.

However, the complexity of a work tends to be ordered so that it is beautiful to be contemplated and existentiated.

The fullness of individuality and originality is not found in the midst of chaos, but in the awareness that through themselves beauty can be orderly appreciated. The prosperity of diversity is only present when one realizes that the egoistic preoccupation is concerned only with itself, and not with the external.

In a theological allegory, it would make no sense for "God", the creator of all existence, to give life to the basic principles so that "Being" itself can emerge without sharing its - God's - power of creation to order and structure it. Like theological creativity, music is only beautiful if the individual freedom of each note was instrospectively made aware of its authorship within existence. However, while God cannot give of his energy to create, because in his essence, he is omnipotent, Man, through his finite egoistic essence, creates from his will of self-realization, which is eternalized in the finite, therefore, limited, perception of Man itself.

Through the Ego, existence comes into being, and through existence, Man emerges from his Ego, and even though they are finite, they both act like Gods, therefore, the need for a transcendental divinity is not "necessary" for it to be done the act of "creation", given that mortal "Gods" act in the same way, when they create "Music" - one of their several ways of projecting their will to power for themselves -, and through its essence, the which seeks the realization of its purposes, of its Egoisms, it can be proved that the act of human "Purposeness" is for something metaphysical and transcendental, but the same cannot yet be disserted, given that we exist.

We searched for Gods above and below us, and the only place that truly burns the flame of the "divine", is located in the essence that makes the human being, Human - Egoism.

Through the essay above, three arguments are being affirmed:

(1) If the statement that "music is the exercise of the affirmation of humanity's creative capacity" is true, and that "humanity, even though it is bound by finite existence, is able to give life to its creations through the expenditure of its energy - which is finite -", we come to the conclusion that "the existence of an omnipotent being, who is able to create without expenditure of energy is not intrinsically necessary for the creativity of the diversity and richeness of the Universe", therefore, the statement that "God does not exist" is valid and, therefore, creativity is expressed through Man;

(2) If humanity, through individual subjective creativity, is capable of the gift of creation even though it is finite, its whole existence tends to an "eternalistic" purpose, therefore, it can be concluded that a general metaphysical-transcendental purpose for humanity exists, even if it cannot, at the contemporary age, be explicitly evidenced, and, therefore, creativity is Man;

(3) Every deity external to Man is nothing more than the anthropomorphized projection of the totality of the ontological-egoistic will to power of the essence of humanity, therefore, its eternalization - that of the divinity - is an implicit hint of the metaphysical purpose of existential egoism, and, therefore, creativity is the substance of the acting of Man.