• _db
    3.6k
    Lately I've been considering the idea that what many people see as "metaphysics" is a form of artistic expression. This is not meant to apply to all metaphysics, necessarily, especially since "metaphysics" has no clear-cut definition, despite the various protests of various different groups who all think they have the right way of looking at things.

    From one perspective, metaphysics can be understood as art when one studies someone else's metaphysics without expecting or believing it to be true. Whether or not the theory is correct is sort of irrelevant - what matters is the passion that goes into the theory.

    One could say that metaphysical theories, although on the surface appearing to pursue truth, actually only use truth as a way of directing artistic effort. The goal is not truth per se - the goal is artistic expression by attempting to create a "story" or a "framework" in which a narrative of the broadest form can take place.

    Metaphysical theories don't have power in epistemic terms, per se, but rather in motivational terms. Metaphysics guides people's lives, whether they realize it or not. And while some loudmouths may cry out and shun speculation like metaphysics for being unverifiable or useless (and thus apparently worthless...), we can not only dispute those claims but also argue that metaphysics is artistic expression through conceptual manipulation. Personally speaking, I really enjoy reading the metaphysics of the various historical cultures. Neo-Platonism is mysterious and esoteric, yet intriguing. A what if? - what if Neo-Platonism actually is true?! Simply wondering about that possibility is enough.

    Art has a tendency to lie to us. It shows us something that is not the case. A statue of a man may be too generous to be accurate. Music fools us into feeling sad or angry without any real reason. And perhaps it could be said that metaphysical theories give us a sort of "fiction" that is internally consistent, even if it's not actually accurate. Thus the "art" of metaphysics comes from the intense rigor and spirit, the illusion that it is pursuing truth. It is an activity, a sport of the mind, a process that generates new and creative conceptual structures - not necessarily out of usefulness or truth-aptness but because it's fun and interesting to do. It's about creating an system that is consistent within itself.

    Consider teenagers talking about the mysteries of the universe at the lunch table. Nobody there is "qualified" to (but is anyone, really...?). Yet it's still fun to do. It only gets cringey when they start thinking they actually know anything.

    Reading metaphysics, even if one doesn't believe any of it, can be very interesting as it makes you appreciate just how flexible and able the human mind can be. It makes metaphysical theories, at least some of them, beautiful. At other times, however, metaphysical theories can be downright dangerous and scary; when reading them, you have to wonder what was going on in that person's head that made them think this way, and worse, you have to consider the possibility that what they're saying is actually correct.

    Art also has a tendency to educate us. Consider a political statement on graffiti. Or religious art. Or hell, even the artwork in science textbooks. Metaphysical theories have the tendency to show us things that we might not have noticed before. One of the qualities, it seems, of a good philosopher is a deep and probing habit of observation. The philosopher studies the everyday, the stuff everyone else fails to notice or care about. Reading Schopenhauer's metaphysics, for example, is educating in that it makes the willing nature of man become apparent, and not necessarily that it's actually educating me into the secrets of the cosmos.

    So to end, then, I claim that those who think metaphysics is useless and a waste of time are not only unaware of the epistemic value of metaphysics, but more importantly the aesthetic, artistic aspect of metaphysics, the aspect that is arguably more valuable. Life without metaphysics would be boring and dull. Metaphysics adds some spice to the mix.
  • Cavacava
    2.4k
    Yes I think there are ways art/aesthetics can be compared to metaphysics, but (coming at it from the opposite direction) unlike the philosopher the artist does not always consciously strive towards the truth. The artist's concern is with his making process, how his work becomes complete. A philosophical text primarily appeals to our intellect, a work of art primarily appeals to our imagination. The art work's truth or lie, beauty or ugliness is outside of it in the community of observers and their narratives. Metaphysical works are judged on their content.

    A skeptic or nihilist may not be 'moved' by any work of metaphysics yet the same person may quake in the presence of a truly great work of art. Art's presence becomes manifest in our somatic response to it.

    I think both the metaphysician and the artist approach their work as an attempt to solve a problem. The philosophical work attempts answers, and new questions arise which generate new works. The artist's work maybe the only work of art the artist ever achieves, or like a Matisse or a Picasso, artists with lives full of such works.

    Art must rise above craft in a manner that is similar to how metaphysics must transcend science.
  • Numi Who
    19


    METAPHYSICS AS PROVIDING EXCUSES
    You are on the right path concerning the 'usefulness' of organized nonsense. Take astrology (for an example of 'organized nonsense') - even if you know it is all pure make-believe, what it gives you are 'excuses'. For example, if it says that your 'sign' is compatible with the sign of person of your romantic interest, you will suspend disbelief in order to have an 'excuse' to go after that person of your romantic interest.

    METAPHYSICS AND THE 'IS' GAME
    Those who create metaphysics delude themselves into thinking that their 'pure speculations on reality' (which is the real definition of 'metaphysics') are actually 'correct' with no need for further investigation or verification. I call it the 'IS GAME' - when you claim that your speculations are correct, for whatever knavish reasons (and there are many).

    METAPHYSICS AS ENTERTAINMENT
    In my 'Pinwheel of Life' I classify (as a useful tool) human endeavors into four categories: those of Higher Consciousness (addressing broad/far-ranging concerns, such as securing higher consciousness in a harsh and deadly universe), those on an Animal Level (local/immediate concerns, such as food, shelter, social security, and mindless sex), Enlightened Procreation (which, on a higher-consciousness level includes love, romance, and nurturing), and Rest & Relaxation (which we all need from time to time).
    In light of the vast amount of verified knowledge that we now have (but which is still largely ignored), metaphysics has been reduced to 'entertainment', of which art and creativity also serve (among their other capacities). For example, we can, while rejuvenating, 'lose ourselves in' (aiding 'rest') Greek Mythology or Eastern Mysticism, resting the analytical half of our brain (which did the 'hard work' such as verifying hypotheses, guesses, and possibilities) while lightly exercising our creative half (which does the 'fun work', such as generating imaginative and creative hypotheses, guesses, and identifying possibilities).
  • _db
    3.6k
    METAPHYSICS AS PROVIDING EXCUSESNumi Who

    I don't get this, astrology isn't metaphysics, and metaphysics isn't astrology.

    I call it the 'IS GAME' - when you claim that your speculations are correct, for whatever knavish reasons (and there are many).Numi Who

    Hence why epistemically productive metaphysics is far more conservative and based upon dialectic and not just the speculation of a single mind.
  • Metaphysician Undercover
    13.2k
    Personally speaking, I really enjoy reading the metaphysics of the various historical cultures. Neo-Platonism is mysterious and esoteric, yet intriguing. A what if? - what if Neo-Platonism actually is true?! Simply wondering about that possibility is enough.darthbarracuda

    Sometimes I wonder the very opposite thing, what if Neo-Platonism is not actually true? But really, it's not truth or falsity which we look to in metaphysical principles, it's understanding. And understanding is an art.
  • Janus
    16.3k


    I like that. Understanding is indeed an art.
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.