In debate we come across many reasons to argue, one of which can be endless when both are in disagreement.

If person A were to accuse Person B of something based on flawed logic such as: assumptions, bias, logical fallacy.
B may counter with the same flawed logic which can lead to a stale mate where no matter how much they argue, neither one can logically win unless both are made aware of their flawed logic.

"Now, now, perfectly symmetrical violence never solved anything."
--Hubert J. Farnsworth

Note: There is probably some refrence to some person somewhere that has this ideology, but im only sharing my thoughts on what I have seen in debate.