• Benj96
    2.3k
    Personally I don’t see why we wouldn’t. We are animals after all and similar to many mammals that do indeed have pheromone systems. I feel some people consider the thought of pheromones to be unhygienic, beastly or primitive and so tend to reject the notion on that basis alone which lacks solid reasoning.

    Having said that there are also several scientific approaches that both propose and condemn the idea.
    Some thoughts for you:
    Human olfaction is comparatively poor compared to the smell capabilities of many other mammals - dogs for example have 40,000 times more sensitive noses.

    Humans use soaps, body lotions, colognes and perfumes etc which are so potent and aromatic that one would imagine they make pheromones, if we have any, redundant.

    Olfactory nostalgia is a powerful memory aid. Key memories, emotions, places and things can be invoked in the mind of someone smelling a certain smell. Perhaps a significant others sweat or natural body odour can be enmeshed with the emotions of desire and affection in the same way?

    Pheromones in other animals act at relatively long distances for an extended period of time. People generally don’t get close enough to one another and perhaps mix too quickly in large crowds and social groups for there to be any effectiveness of such chemical messages. Coffee, cigarette smoke and other scents in the human social setting may completely overwhelm subtle signals.

    A small handful of experiments suggest men find women's body odour more attractive during ovulation.

    MHC class molecules of the immune system are often secretory - many end up in sweat glands. The olfactory system has the capacity to bind with several parts of these molecules (in theory). Their volatility in sweat however is questionable.

    Humans sweat during sex. They also kiss. It would be easy for pheromones to be produced only during arousal in body fluids or as a bonding aid. Arousal is a difficult thing to establish in a clinical experimental setting with onlookers.

    Finally... wealth, physical attractiveness, personality, career etc all influence the choices we make about partners so pheromones may be obsolete due to cultural and societal values.

    Thoughts?
  • Olivier5
    6.2k
    The existence of pheromones in humans is well attested, I think.
  • baker
    5.6k
    People generally don’t get close enough to one another and perhaps mix too quickly in large crowds and social groups for there to be any effectiveness of such chemical messages.Benj96
    There is also a cultural factor in this.

    In Turkish culture, for example, it's normal for parents to yearn after the smell of their children, even their adult children. And they hug eachother and breathe in eachother's bodily smell. And by this, I don't mean perfume, soap, and such, but actual bodily smell.
  • Pinprick
    950

    I think @Olivier5 is right. Also, I heard about experiments that seem to indicate that we react to pheromones subconsciously. For example, one of the experiments showed that given the choice of any seat in a room you’re more likely to sit in the exact seat, or near the exact seat, your significant other chose. So, your significant other goes into the room and chooses a seat to sit in. I’m guessing they remain seated for a certain amount of time, and then leave. Then you’re asked to choose any seat, and more often than not you’ll sit close to wherever they sat.
  • MAYAEL
    239
    We react to pheromones just like animals do it's just that Society has made us so numb and dumb to our animal side that we are completely unaware of it
bold
italic
underline
strike
code
quote
ulist
image
url
mention
reveal
youtube
tweet
Add a Comment

Welcome to The Philosophy Forum!

Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.