Property dualism accounts for mental and physical properties of any phenomenal X in order to describe / explain it exhaustively. Spinozism, however, while doing likewise, also posits that there are an infinite number of properties – "attributes" – and that (our) finite reason apprehends only two properties – "attributes of thought and extension" – with which all of our (first & second kinds of) knowing consists (re: Ethics Ip9-11, IIp1-3 ...)Can anyone better versed in Spinoza explain the difference between his theory and property dualism? — vulcanlogician
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.