Why should the military focus only on external threats? If we were to ever reach a point where we had to rise up against our national government, there isn't much we could do at this point. With the advancements of weapon technology, most people couldn't really afford to pay for anything that could fight off drones, missiles, tanks or any of the technology the government uses. — MonfortS26
Shouldn't our healthy democracies be prepared for such situations though? Wouldn't state run militaries be a potential solution? — MonfortS26
I believe that a single authority on any matter is a dangerous road to corruption. By leaving our military under the ultimate control of the federal government aren't we putting ourselves in the likely position of losing our freedoms? Shouldn't military power be divided? — MonfortS26
If the purpose of the military is to protect its citizens, ... — MonfortS26
By leaving our military under the ultimate control of the federal government aren't we putting ourselves in the likely position of losing our freedoms? Shouldn't military power be divided? — MonfortS26
like what Bitter Crank says about "eternal vigilance") — jkop
:-} The military is also used for attack, conquest, or invasion, recall, which has little to do with protection. The US-led invasion of Iraq, for instance, served special interests far more than it protected citizens against alleged "weapons of mass destruction". The idea of protection was misused to mislead the citizens. — jkop
A democracy without government merely amounts to "might makes right", in which case all citizens lose their freedoms because (like what Bitter Crank says about "eternal vigilance") they end up being on guard against each other all the time and everywhere. — jkop
A democratic military with the capability of separating and fighting our government if need be. — MonfortS26
If the purpose of the military is to protect its citizens, Why is that left up to the federal government? — MonfortS26
If the purpose of the military is to protect its citizens, Why is that left up to the federal government? — MonfortS26
For better or worse, the Constitution specifically identifies the military as the responsibility of the federal government. — T Clark
Seems like the existence of a standing army itself is the biggest risk that OP sees in armed forces. Not that actually militaries are there to fight against other militaries or create a deterrence against other armies. In our very peaceful times where the only threat seems to be individual terrorists, this seems to be forgotten.If the purpose of the military is to protect its citizens, Why is that left up to the federal government? Shouldn't that be a state concern? I believe that a single authority on any matter is a dangerous road to corruption. By leaving our military under the ultimate control of the federal government aren't we putting ourselves in the likely position of losing our freedoms? Shouldn't military power be divided? — MonfortS26
Get involved in philosophical discussions about knowledge, truth, language, consciousness, science, politics, religion, logic and mathematics, art, history, and lots more. No ads, no clutter, and very little agreement — just fascinating conversations.